Terraform Labs, Do Kwon Fail to Have Singapore Class-Action Suit Rejected: Report

CoinDeskPolicyPublicado a 2023-11-30Actualizado a 2023-12-01

Resumen

The suit was filed in September 2022 by Julian Moreno Beltran and Douglas Gan on behalf of 375 others, who claim they lost a combined $57 million.

Terraform Labs and its founder, Do Kwon, may be hit with a class-action lawsuit in Singapore after the High Court dismissed an attempt to have it thrown out, Business Times reported on Thursday.

Terraform lawyers tried to shift the action to an arbitration process, citing the website's terms of use, according to the Business Times. The lawyers claimed users had foregone the right to trial and to join a class-action suit. The court ruled otherwise.

10

"To our knowledge, this is the furthest a class-action suit has progressed in the world," Mahesh Rai, a director of Drew & Napier, which represents the claimants, said in an interview. "Now we are approaching discovery stage."

Advertisement
Advertisement

The suit was filed in September 2022 by Julian Moreno Beltran and Douglas Gan on behalf of 375 others, who claim they lost a combined $57 million.

The claimants are alleging fraudulent misrepresentation by Terraform Labs, Do Kwon and his co-founders in their promotion of the algorithmic stablecoin terraUSD (UST), which led them to purchase and stake the tokens and hold on to them as UST lost its peg to the U.S. dollar in May 2022 and plunged to less than $0.10.

Terraform also faces charges of fraud in the U.S. brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission, which alleges it was selling unregistered securities. In October, Terraform asked for this case to be dismissed on the grounds that the regulator had been unable to make its case.

The company did not immediately respond to CoinDesk's request for further comment.

Edited by Sheldon Reback.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Stripe Helps Revolut Issue a Euro Stablecoin

On August 26th, Revolut announced the rollout of EURR, a new euro-pegged stablecoin, to select users in Denmark, Poland, and Portugal, with plans to expand across the European Economic Area. The stablecoin, issued 1:1 against the euro on Ethereum and Polygon, is not issued by Revolut itself. Instead, it is issued by Bridge Building S.A., a Stripe-owned, Luxembourg-based electronic money institution licensed under the MiCA framework. This structure positions Revolut as the distribution channel for its over 80 million users, while Stripe/Bridge provides the compliant issuance infrastructure and reserve management. EURR's launch is essentially a cold start, with a circulating supply of only 374 tokens. It enters a euro stablecoin market dominated by Circle's EURC and Société Générale's EURCV, which itself is a tiny fraction of the massive dollar stablecoin market led by USDT and USDC. EURR's primary advantage is Revolut's vast user base, aiming to onboard retail banking customers to on-chain finance. However, its utility for the average Revolut user, who already enjoys fast euro transfers, remains tied to specific crypto-native use cases like DeFi. The launch coincides with Revolut's MiCA-driven phasing out of USDT for European users, positioning EURR as a compliant replacement. More broadly, the partnership highlights Stripe's strategy through its Bridge acquisition: building a "stablecoin-as-a-service" or "issuance-as-a-service" platform. Stripe aims to provide the compliant backend infrastructure—issuance, reserves, redemption—allowing other companies like Revolut to launch branded stablecoins easily, potentially reshaping the industry's competitive landscape from direct token competition to infrastructure services.

marsbitHace 9 min(s)

Stripe Helps Revolut Issue a Euro Stablecoin

marsbitHace 9 min(s)

U.S. Financial Risks Benefit Gold and Bitcoin! Record Capital Inflow Over the Last Five Trading Days! Here's All the Data

Concerns over U.S. fiscal prospects and growing government debt are driving investors towards both gold and Bitcoin. Over the last five trading days, a record $7 billion flowed into gold and Bitcoin ETFs. Approximately $3.4 billion entered the SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) fund, while BlackRock's spot Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) saw around $1.5 billion in inflows, placing both among the top ten U.S. ETFs by weekly capital inflow. Bloomberg notes the simultaneous strong inflows into both assets as particularly remarkable, a shift from past behavior where investors typically favored gold as a safe haven during market stress. Recent investor behavior has changed due to expectations of increased U.S. government borrowing, concerns about the dollar, and policies aimed at lowering long-term interest rates, boosting demand for assets with limited supply. The concurrent rise in the value of gold and Bitcoin indicates investors are turning to alternative assets to hedge against risks within the traditional financial system, especially amid heightened debates on U.S. debt sustainability. Experts suggest this strong ETF inflow may signal that institutional investors are increasingly viewing Bitcoin as a portfolio diversification tool similar to gold, though Bitcoin's high price volatility means the risk profiles of the two assets remain significantly different.

cryptonews.ruHace 9 min(s)

U.S. Financial Risks Benefit Gold and Bitcoin! Record Capital Inflow Over the Last Five Trading Days! Here's All the Data

cryptonews.ruHace 9 min(s)

Tokenized Deposits Could Raise US Lending Costs: Dallas Fed Economists

Tokenized deposits could increase U.S. lending costs and make bank funding less stable, according to an analysis by Dallas Fed economists. Rosy Leigh and Sreeni Ramaswamy note that instant settlement capabilities, programmable deposit tokens, and AI could allow depositors chasing higher yields to move funds faster between banks, reducing deposit tenures and increasing their sensitivity to interest rates. The economists estimate that a 10% increase in deposit rate sensitivity could reduce banks' capacity to hold long-term loans by around $700 billion over a ten‑year equivalent. A 10% reduction in deposit tenures could lower capacity by about $580 billion. These scenarios do not imply a direct, proportional cut in lending but highlight potential pressures. U.S. banks are developing blockchain networks for moving tokenized deposits around‑the‑clock while keeping funds within the regulated banking system. Thirty‑nine state banking associations recently formed the BankChain alliance to build a nationwide network, while The Clearing House is developing a separate network with major banks. Institutions like Standard Chartered and HSBC have also tested cross‑border tokenized deposit transactions via blockchain. Banks may respond to more volatile deposits by holding more liquid assets (like reserves and Treasuries) or relying more on wholesale debt—which would likely raise borrowing costs for consumers and businesses. The authors cite Brazil's Pix instant payment system as a comparative example, where increased use raised bank liquidity holdings and reduced credit intermediation.

cryptonews.ruHace 11 min(s)

Tokenized Deposits Could Raise US Lending Costs: Dallas Fed Economists

cryptonews.ruHace 11 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片