Central Banks Have No Interest in Personal Data, BIS Official Says While Promoting CBDCs

CoinDeskPolicyPublicado a 2023-11-27Actualizado a 2023-11-28

Resumen

The Bank for International Settlements has been calling on countries to prepare for CBDCs as governments face backlash over privacy concerns.

  • Retail central bank digital currencies (CBDC) have drawn criticism from lawmakers and the public around the world over privacy concerns.
  • Unlike the private sector, central banks have no interest in personal data, Bank for International Settlements official Cecilia Skingsley said Tuesday.
  • She urged people to stay open to technological innovation.
9.2K
Vivek Ramaswamy Seen as Most Formidable Trump Challenger by Blockchain Bettors

Central banks have no interest in personal data, said Bank for International Settlements (BIS) official Cecilia Skingsley on Tuesday, seemingly looking to quell privacy concerns surrounding national digital currencies.

The central bank group has been pushing governments around the world to continue work on central bank digital currencies (CBDC) to prepare for the future of payments.

However, monetary authorities in major jurisdictions like the U.S. and the European Union are facing mounting criticism over plans to issue CBDCs, and a chief concern is if and how citizens’ privacy will be protected.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The public too would feel better about using digital versions of fiat currencies like the U.S. dollar or British pound if privacy was preserved. Ensuring privacy increased participants' willingness to use a CBDC by up to 60% when purchasing privacy-sensitive products, a recent BIS report showed.

Skingsley, is the head of the BIS’ Innovation Hub which is responsible for multiple CBDC research projects with central banks around the world. Skingsley addressed privacy fears while speaking at the Atlantic Council's CBDC conference in Washington DC, and urged the public to stay open to technological innovation.

"Central banks have no commercial interest in personal data – unlike the private sector," she said.

Information that banks have on where, how and what people spend money on is protected by legal frameworks – something which Skingsley urged should be preserved when countries decide to issue retail CBDCs.

When considering the design of a CBDC, people will also have to grapple with difficult questions on choice, inclusion and stability, Skingsley said. But "innovation usually takes us to new places and opens up possibilities that were not there until a new technological breakthrough has happened," she added.

Some people are concerned that retail CBDCs could cause bank runs – where too many people withdraw their money at the same time putting pressure on banks’ liquidity. With the right provisions like fast-acting crisis management tools and limits on fund withdrawals, CBDCs won't necessarily increase the possibility of bank runs, Skingsley said.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Wholesale CBDCs, which are another type of currency used only between banks, could be a "game changer" for cross border payments, she added, pointing to BIS Innovation Hub projects like Jura, Dunbar and mBridge as examples.

"Based on our findings, benefits from issuing a wholesale CBDC could include operational transparency, faster settlement, and less risk," Skingsley said.

The BIS will on Wednesday publish the conclusions from project Tourbillon, which proposes new privacy solutions for retail CBDCs.

Edited by Sandali Handagama.

Lecturas Relacionadas

a16z on Hiring: How to Choose Between Crypto-Native and Traditional Talent?

Hiring in Crypto: Balancing Crypto-Native and Traditional Talent As the crypto industry grows, founders face the dilemma of whether to prioritize hiring professionals with blockchain experience or those with traditional tech backgrounds who can learn. The key is recognizing that crypto companies are still tech companies at their core and should apply proven hiring best practices. Crypto-native talent offers immediate productivity and is essential for roles involving high-stakes, specialized work like smart contract development, where errors can be catastrophic. However, traditional professionals from large-scale software companies bring valuable experience in scaling products, operational flexibility, and expertise in areas like fintech, UX, and security, which are crucial as crypto products target mainstream adoption. Recruiting requires tailored approaches. Some candidates may be hesitant due to crypto's volatility or complexity, while others are excited by its innovative potential. Assess candidates' motivations, curiosity, and alignment with the company's vision early. Emphasize the opportunity to shape technology's future and address financial incentives, such as token-based compensation, which can offer liquidity compared to traditional equity. Onboarding is critical. Identify knowledge gaps during hiring and design education programs, mentorship, knowledge-sharing sessions, and resources like blogs or courses to accelerate learning. Pairing new hires with experienced crypto professionals helps bridge gaps and fosters collaboration. Ultimately, successful teams blend both crypto-native and traditional talent, leveraging their strengths to drive innovation and growth.

marsbitHace 50 min(s)

a16z on Hiring: How to Choose Between Crypto-Native and Traditional Talent?

marsbitHace 50 min(s)

DeFi Hacked Again for $292 Million, Is Even Aave No Longer Safe?

On April 19, a major DeFi security breach occurred, resulting in the loss of approximately $292 million. The attack targeted Kelp DAO’s rsETH bridge contract built on LayerZero, with 116,500 rsETH stolen. The attacker initiated the exploit using funds from Tornado Cash and manipulated the LayerZero EndpointV2 contract to transfer the assets. Kelp DAO confirmed the incident and temporarily paused rsETH contracts across multiple networks while collaborating with security experts for investigation. Initial analysis suggests the root cause was a compromised private key on the source chain, with the contract secured by only a 1/1 validator set, making it vulnerable to a single malicious transaction. The attacker used the stolen rsETH as collateral on lending platforms—including Aave, Compound, and Euler—to borrow more liquid assets like WETH, accumulating over $236 million in debt. Aave alone accounted for $196 million of this amount. In response, Aave froze its rsETH markets and stated it would explore covering potential bad debt through its Umbrella safety module, which holds around $50 million in WETH. This incident follows another large exploit earlier in April, where Drift Protocol on Solana lost $280 million. The repeated high-value attacks raise concerns about DeFi security, even affecting major protocols like Aave. Users are advised to exercise caution, diversify holdings, and limit exposure to on-chain protocols until more robust security measures are established.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

DeFi Hacked Again for $292 Million, Is Even Aave No Longer Safe?

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片