U.S. Lawmakers Urge Treasury to Revise Proposed Crypto Tax Rules

CoinDeskPolicyPublicado a 2023-11-15Actualizado a 2023-11-16

Resumen

Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, Patrick McHenry (R-NC) and Congressman Ritchie Torres (D-N.Y) led a group of nine lawmakers in the effort.

A group of bipartisan U.S. lawmakers have urged the Treasury to revise its proposed digital-assets taxation regime. The group is backing crypto representatives and lawyers who have called the proposed taxation scheme “dangerous and improper overreach.”

Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, Patrick McHenry (R-NC) and Congressman Ritchie Torres (D-N.Y) led a group of nine lawmakers in the effort calling the tax reporting requirement “unworkable.”

“If finalized, the proposed regulation’s overly broad definition of a digital asset “Broker,” insufficient definition of a “Digital Asset,” and unreasonably short comment period threaten to prevent a large swath of the digital asset ecosystem from continuing to exist in the United States,” the Wednesday announcement said as it made public the Nov. 10 letter addressed to the U.S. Treasury Department’s Assistant Secretary Lily Batchelder.

A D V E R T I S E M E N T
A D V E R T I S E M E N T

The crypto tax rule was proposed in August, and a public comment period ended Monday after more than 124,000 comments. At a recent audio-only hearing, questions from officials to the industry revealed that the tax proposal may be “open for revision.” A final version is likely months away and could see a response to at least some of the industry’s condemnation.

The major sticking point is how the proposal captures hosted wallet providers, payment processors, some decentralized finance (DeFi) entities and others as “brokers” for tax reporting purposes. “The definition of ‘Broker’ remains too broad and would capture entities that do not possess traditional characteristics of a broker,” the letter said.

Edited by Parikshit Mishra.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Dallas Fed Economists Warn of Risks from Tokenized Deposits

Economists from the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas have warned about the potential risks of widespread adoption of tokenized deposits. They argue that while enabling real-time settlements, tokenization could destabilize bank funding models. The ease of instant transfers between institutions may reduce deposit stability, making it harder for banks to forecast balances and forcing them to hold more high-quality liquid assets. This shift could limit banks' capacity for long-term lending and increase borrowing costs. Using a model, the economists estimate that a 10% decrease in the average maturity of bank deposits could reduce the banking system's ability to hold interest rate risk by approximately $580 billion (in 10-year asset equivalents). A 10% increase in the sensitivity of deposit rates to market rates could have an even larger impact of around $700 billion. They cite Brazil's Pix instant payment system as an analogous case where increased usage correlated with banks holding more liquid assets and reducing credit intermediation. The analysis comes as major banks accelerate tokenization projects, such as the formation of the BankChain alliance and infrastructure initiatives by JPMorgan, Citigroup, and others. The authors conclude that while the sector is nascent, the architecture and rules of future tokenized deposit systems will be crucial in determining their ultimate impact on financial stability.

cryptonews.ruHace 1 min(s)

Dallas Fed Economists Warn of Risks from Tokenized Deposits

cryptonews.ruHace 1 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片