DYDX暴涨背后的逻辑:代币定位升级,解锁新收益可能

Odaily星球日报Publicado a 2023-11-15Actualizado a 2023-11-15

Resumen

从现在起,DYDX质押群体将分享100%的协议收入。

原创 | Odaily星球日报

作者 | Azuma

DYDX暴涨背后的逻辑:代币定位升级,解锁新收益可能

OKX 行情显示,去中心化衍生品协议(现在或许该叫网络了)dYdX(DYDX)今日大幅攀升,最高一度突破 4.1 USDT,截至发文暂报 3.94 USDT, 24 小时涨幅 15.66% 。

推动 DYDX 本轮暴涨的关键性事件并不难找。

11 月 13 日晚间,关于启动所有交易市场的 dYdX Chain 治理提案 #1 顺利通过,这意味着 dYdX Chain 已过度至 Beta 阶段,交易功能正式于 dYdX Chain 激活。换句话说,dYdX 预热了近一年之久的 v4 版本已成功落地,用户已可在 v4 市场上自由交易。

DYDX暴涨背后的逻辑:代币定位升级,解锁新收益可能

作为 dYdX 路线图中的关键节点,v4 落地无疑是市场预期已久的一大利好,不过,本次升级究竟能够为 DYDX 代币带来多大的新势能,市场仍然一个更为直观的解析。

今年 6 月,dYdX 官宣了关于 v4 版本最重要的一则公告 —— 将从以太坊生态转移至 Cosmos 生态,基于 Cosmos SDK 开发作为 v4 版本基础的 dYdX Chain。

这一转型的最大意义在于,DYDX 在定位上实现了升级。

原本,以太坊之上 ERC-20 版本的 DYDX(为了区分,接下来叫作 ethDYDX )仅具有对 v3 版本协议治理效用,但却无法分享协议收入;而随着 dYdX Chain 的启动,ethDYDX 桥接进来后 1: 1 映射而出的 DYDX 将成为 dYdX Chain 这条 Layer 1 的原生代币,从而为 DYDX 解锁了治理之外的更多新效用。

根据 dYdX 基金会的表述,在 dYdX Chain 上,协议收取的所有费用(包括以 USDC 计价的交易手续费,以 DYDX 计价或 USDC 计价时交易的 gas 费)都将分配给所有参与 DYDX 质押的对象,包括验证者(Validators)和质押者(Stakers)。

DYDX暴涨背后的逻辑:代币定位升级,解锁新收益可能

注意,是 100% 的费用收入均会流向 DYDX 质押群体,且收入构成除了具有一定波动性之外的 DYDX,还包括稳定币 USDC。

值得一提的是,根据 dYdX 创始人 Antonio Juliano 的说法,为了保持 dYdX Chain 始终由社区所控制,dYdX 开发母公司 dYdX Trading 及其员工均不会参与 DYDX 的质押。

DYDX暴涨背后的逻辑:代币定位升级,解锁新收益可能

大概两周之前,dYdX Chain 完成了主网创世,随即也激活了 DYDX 链上质押。

链上数据显示,截至发文已有约 3.5 亿枚 ethDYDX 完成了向 dYdX Chain 的迁移,已质押的 DYDX 数量则已接近 1000 万枚。

DYDX暴涨背后的逻辑:代币定位升级,解锁新收益可能

不过,由于 dYdX Chain 上的交易功能刚刚激活,整体交易量暂时仍然较低,过去 24 小时仅有 609 笔交易,未平仓合约仅有约 1 万美元,总交易量也只有 3 万美元。基于该数据计算,当前 DYDX 质押实际可分享的收入暂时可忽略不计,或许也正是由于这个原因,目前 dYdX 的官方质押界面暂时并未给出 DYDX 的质押预期收益(APR)。

DYDX暴涨背后的逻辑:代币定位升级,解锁新收益可能

那么,若 dYdX v4 逐渐跑出规模,DYDX 预计可以获得多高的收益水平呢?理论上来看,该数据会与 DYDX 的整体质押率,以及 v4 市场的实际交易量直接挂钩。Crypto 对冲基金 Ouroboros Capital 曾通过计算给出过 20% 的 APR 预测,但这也仅是一家之言,具体情况如何还需等待后续的事实验证。

DYDX暴涨背后的逻辑:代币定位升级,解锁新收益可能

总而言之,v4 版本的落地让 DYDX 的代币定位实现了升级,为其解锁了全新的收益可能性,从而改善了市场对于该代币的价值预期。

最后想要强调的是,本文内容仅为对 dYdX 近期动态的逻辑分析,并不涉及投资建议。从风险层面,一是 DYDX 即将在 12 月迎来大额解锁,二是 dYdX 转向 Cosmos 生态后也会面临一定的流动性扩充难题(相较于以太坊生态而言),这或许会直接影响 v4 版本的市场表现,因此还请大家在操作之前慎重考虑,DYOR。

Lecturas Relacionadas

Football Draw Harvests Whales: Extreme Profit-Loss Divergence on Polymarket's World Cup

A bettor known as "fishalive" made a stunning profit of nearly $9 million on the Polymarket prediction platform by correctly wagering against favorites during the 2026 FIFA World Cup group stage. The account, registered just before the tournament, risked roughly $400,000 on two contracts for a Spain vs. Cape Verde match: one that Spain would *not* win, and another on a Cape Verde +2.5 goal handicap. The resulting 0-0 draw triggered both payouts. This single event, with a total market volume of $64 million, highlighted extreme profit-and-loss divergence. Other traders, like "betoor619" and "leeeeroyjenkins," lost millions by betting heavily on favorites Spain and Belgium to win outright—contracts that become worthless in a draw. The article explains that while markets heavily favored strong teams, the "team to win" contracts are binary and do not account for the common outcome of a draw. This creates high-risk, low-reward scenarios for favorite backers, while asymmetric profits flow to those betting on underdogs or against outright wins. The transparency of Polymarket's on-chain ledger publicly documents these massive wins and losses, driving mainstream media coverage. As the tournament progresses, the author suggests traders may shift towards hedging strategies that account for draws. The piece also notes growing regulatory scrutiny in the US and Europe, questioning whether such large-scale, anonymous sports prediction markets should be regulated as gambling or financial derivatives.

Foresight NewsHace 20 min(s)

Football Draw Harvests Whales: Extreme Profit-Loss Divergence on Polymarket's World Cup

Foresight NewsHace 20 min(s)

ChatGPT Loses Half Its Market: From Monopoly to Shared Market in Three and a Half Years

In a landmark shift three and a half years after its debut, ChatGPT's global market share in the AI assistant market has fallen below 50% for the first time, dropping to 46.4% as of May 2026. This signals the end of its initial dominance, with the market now diversifying among competitors like Gemini (27.7%) and Claude (10.3%). The report from Sensor Tower indicates the AI assistant landscape has matured from a phase of awe and experimentation into one of product comparison, ecosystem integration, and monetization. Users are increasingly pragmatic, readily switching between assistants based on specific use cases, brand trust, and value propositions. The industry is moving past the "free lunch" era, with users demonstrating a willingness to pay for premium features, driving significant in-app expenditure. Major players are adopting varied monetization strategies: Claude boasts a high subscription conversion rate, while ChatGPT is increasingly testing ads and shopping integrations to complement its subscription revenue. However, this growth comes with immense costs, as exemplified by OpenAI's soaring cash burn for model training and infrastructure. While ChatGPT remains the largest single player, its declining share symbolizes a broader normalization of AI. The technology is no longer a novelty but an integral, scrutinized part of daily digital life, judged on practical utility, price, and seamless integration. The battle has shifted from proving AI's potential to competing in a crowded field where no single product holds a permanent monopoly.

marsbitHace 31 min(s)

ChatGPT Loses Half Its Market: From Monopoly to Shared Market in Three and a Half Years

marsbitHace 31 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片