币安内嵌Web3钱包开测，新旧网络界限已打破

Odaily星球日报Publicado a 2023-11-06Actualizado a 2023-11-06

Resumen

CEX抢占Web3流量入口。

原创 | Odaily星球日报

作者 | 夫如何

币安内嵌Web3钱包开测，新旧网络界限已打破

代表中心化的 CEX 以及代表去中心化的 Web3 钱包，是大多数人参与加密市场必不可少的工具。单近些年，两者的边界逐渐模糊。

以 OKX 为首的交易所打造内置的 Web3 钱包，用户在入金之后，无需转账到其他链上钱包，即可参与链上活动；以 MetaMask 为代表的钱包，将出入金通道集成到自身钱包中，为用户打通全流程业务模式。

当然也有一部分中心化交易所，采用收购或自研 Web3 钱包的方式来布局，比如币安在 2018 年收购 Trust Wallet，Bitget 今年 3 月份收购 BitKeep，Coinbase 推出 Coinbase Wallet。

上述项目无论采用哪种方式布局，都是在抢占未来 Web3 的流量阵地。

近期，作为中心化交易所龙头的币安，为交易所内置的 Web3 钱包开启了灰度测试，测试的情况如何？Odaily星球日报对此进行了探究。

币安Web3钱包反响平平，TWT 反而突破新高？

11 月 3 日，根据加密社区反馈，币安 App 内置的 Web3 钱包邀请了一部分用户开启了灰度测试。（Odaily 注：灰度测试是指在某项应用正式发布前，选择特定人群试用，逐步扩大其试用者数量，以便及时发现和纠正其中的问题））

币安 Web3 钱包，是币安 App 中的自托管加密钱包，旨在降低用户进入去中心化金融领域（DeFi）世界的门槛。作为基于区块链的应用程序（dApp）的数字网关，它为用户提供了一个安全和简化的方法来管理他们的加密货币，跨链执行代币交易，赚取收益，并与各种链上生态平台进行交互。

币安 Web3 钱包采用 MPC（多方安全计算）技术管理每一个事务，降低了单点故障的可能性。并且，币安 Web3 钱包采用复杂的安全机制，将产生三个独立的密钥共享，单独存储在包括您的个人云和设备的位置；要访问币安钱包，至少需要两个密钥共享。另外还有其他增强的安全功能，例如错误地址保护和恶意合同检测等，会在交易时通知用户代币和链路是否存在安全风险。

那么，早期测试用户的对此次灰度测试的反馈怎么样呢？

Odaily星球日报搜索发现，社区对于币安 Web3 钱包的反馈较为平淡，有测试过的人在社媒表达，无法导出私钥。但经笔者测试，目前币安 Web3 钱包功能一切正常，用户只需要下载 Google Drive 即可创建钱包密钥。由于币安 Web3 钱包尚处于早期测试阶段，相关配套尚不完善，作者无法做更多的测评体验分享。

受币安测试内置 Web3 钱包消息影响，与币安有关的另一个钱包项目——Trust Wallet 在过去几天成为炒作的焦点，价格大幅上升。该项目于 2018 年被币安收购，上涨原因可能与社区所传的「Trust Wallet 帮助币安开发 Web3 钱包」的情绪面有关。

Bitget 行情显示，Trust Wallet 代币 TWT 从 11 月 3 日的 1.1 USDT 一度飙升至最高 1.55 USDT，创今年 2 月中旬以来新高；暂报 1.46 USDT， 24 小时涨幅为 9.4% 。

币安内嵌Web3钱包开测，新旧网络界限已打破

Web2与Web3的界限逐渐模糊

中心化与去中心化的界限在如今的发展中逐渐变得模糊，中心化交易所布局 Web3 钱包，Web3 钱包打通与现实的界限。两者的最终目的，都是为了将用户流量留存到自身体系中。

币安凭借自身交易所的庞大流量，外加上 Trust Wallet、App 内置钱包，将用户 Web3 活动的覆盖面拉满。

不过，币安的内置钱包毕竟刚刚诞生，规模较小，反观 OKX Web3 钱包目前已经发展较为成熟，特别是在比特币生态方面抢占先发优势——OKX CEO Star 还表示未来 OKX Web3钱包可能会成为独立的应用程序。

总而言之，无论是币安和 OKX 为首的中心化交易所，还是 MetaMask 为首的Web3钱包，都在努力打破新旧网络的界限，让新用户更加便捷的进入 Web3。

Lecturas Relacionadas

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbitHace 45 min(s)

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbitHace 45 min(s)

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbitHace 49 min(s)

marsbitHace 49 min(s)

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbitHace 55 min(s)

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbitHace 55 min(s)

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbitHace 55 min(s)

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbitHace 55 min(s)

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

In today's TechFlow Intelligence Briefing, several major tech stories highlight a growing theme of trust and credibility gaps across AI, crypto, and finance. AI company Anthropic has publicly called for a global pause in AI development, citing risks from Claude's "recursive self-improvement." Ironically, this coincides with reports the company is preparing for a massive IPO targeting a near $1 trillion valuation. This perceived hypocrisy, coupled with widespread user complaints about Claude's declining performance, is sparking debate over whether the safety warning is genuine or a competitive tactic. Meanwhile, in a substantive security move, Anthropic open-sourced a framework for AI-powered vulnerability discovery. In the crypto market, Bitcoin's price drop below $61,000 triggered over $1.16 billion in liquidations, flipping the market into a state where more BTC is held at a loss than at a profit, a historical bearish signal. On the corporate front, SpaceX's highly anticipated IPO is generating immense Wall Street excitement, with Goldman Sachs projecting 100x revenue growth by 2030. However, the S&P 500 has refused to fast-track the company's inclusion post-IPO, potentially limiting immediate institutional demand. Separately, ByteDance's AI app Doubao lost over 6 million monthly active users after introducing a subscription model, highlighting the challenges of AI monetization. Other notable developments include Nvidia certifying HBM4 memory from Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron; Cloudflare's acquisition of front-end tooling company VoidZero; and its CEO warning that bot traffic now exceeds human traffic online. The underlying narrative connects these events: a trust crisis. From AI firms' contradictory actions and crypto volatility to the clash between SpaceX's hyped narrative and institutional rules, a pattern is emerging where stated intentions and actual practices are increasingly misaligned.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros