不止于小图片,一文盘点值得关注的动态NFT

Odaily星球日报Publicado a 2023-11-04Actualizado a 2023-11-04

Resumen

本文将重点介绍一些具有时间维度的著名动态 NFT。

原文作者:WILLIAMM.PEASTE

原文编译:深潮 TchFlow

关于 NFT 仍存在许多误解。例如,本周 Elon Musk 表示所有 NFT 都是“链下”的,而实际上有很多 NFT 是完全在链上的。

另一个普遍的误解是,NFT 或多或少只是静态图像。

可以肯定的是,这是不对的!事实上,我最喜欢的一些 NFT 是随着时间的推移以某种形式或方式进化或可以进化的。

在今天的文章中,让我们做一些小小的回顾,并重点介绍一些具有时间维度的著名动态 NFT。

1) Lifeforms

不止于小图片,一文盘点值得关注的动态NFT

由艺术家和软件开发者 Sarah Friend 创建,Lifeforms 是 Polygon 上的“基于 NFT 的实体”,需要“定期照顾以保持其茁壮成长”。换句话说,您必须在收到 Lifeform 后的 90 天内将其从您的钱包转移,否则它将被销毁。

今天,这些实体仅剩下 50 多个。在 2022 年将 Lifeforms 入围 Lumen Prize 奖,对该系列的描述如下:

“通过将意外的动态引入智能合同系统,Lifeforms 颠覆了 NFT 的典型逻辑,即购买、持有并希望其价值增加,而是要求‘所有者’成为一位必须不断维护或照顾他们的 NFT 的看护人或照料人,与其他人共同合作。”

2) Chaos Roads

不止于小图片,一文盘点值得关注的动态NFT

由艺术家、策展人、数据科学家和 NFT 历史学家 Chainleft 创建,Chaos Roads 是一个完全在链上运行的艺术收藏,包括艺术、音乐和诗歌,全部都是由项目的代码加上以太坊虚拟机(EVM)生成的。

值得注意的是,在这个架构中,有一个编码的“Entropy”系统,允许 NFT 的所有者回到其较早的视觉状态之一。因此,这个项目的作品不仅在每个以太坊块中实际演变,而且还可以随时间返回到较早的美学演变。这是利用始终开启的以太坊进行艺术动态性的早期示例。

不止于小图片,一文盘点值得关注的动态NFT

3) Corruption(s*)

不止于小图片,一文盘点值得关注的动态NFT

由 Blitmap、Loot 和 Sup 背后的主要创作者 dom 开发, Corruption(s*)是一个完全在链上的生成式 ASCII 加密艺术项目,于 2021 年 11 月秘密启动。

这个系列之所以引人注目,是因为它创新了一个在链上的演进洞察系统。该系统涉及到每个 NFT 都有一个洞察特征,它们随时间累积洞察经验,从而演变出作品的美学。如果 Corruption 保持不被转移,积累速度会加快,而在“不稳定”即转移时会减慢。

4) Etholvants

不止于小图片,一文盘点值得关注的动态NFT

Etholvants 于 2021 年 10 月首次发布,是另一个完全在链上的实验,旨在通过将它们组合在一起或质押 NFT 来发展单细胞数字生物。后一种方法看到这些生物“每 4 小时增长 2 个细胞”,但已经合并了数百个,因此今天只剩下 8400 多个 Etholvants 存在。

5) Fini

不止于小图片,一文盘点值得关注的动态NFT

Fini 是“使用预言机以响应加密货币价值波动的活动 NFT”。

换句话说,特定 Fini 的情绪会不断在小时、天或周的时间表内通过与其绑定的加密货币的表现而不断变化,这可以是以太坊、比特币、Solana、狗狗币、Polygon、ChainlinkUniswap、BNB Chain、Avalanche 或 Tezos 等。

尽管我个人认为整个系列是一个巨大的动态概念艺术项目,但 Fini 的角色本身也具有标志性和可爱的 PFPs,为追踪您喜欢的代币的价格走势提供了非常迷人的途径。

6) SALT

不止于小图片,一文盘点值得关注的动态NFT

SALT 是由艺术家 0x mons 和 Figure 合作创建的摄影加密艺术系列,具有动态渲染功能,这意味着其代币的美学会根据链上状态的变化而发展。

这在实践中意味着每天都会在不断循环中从一个代币到另一个代币异步循环该系列的 180 张照片。创作者们之前解释说,“没有所有者拥有特定的图像,所有图像都是集体共享的。”

7) Terraforms

不止于小图片,一文盘点值得关注的动态NFT

Mathcastles 的 Terraforms 具有许多独特的方面,无法用一句话简单地解释。简而言之,该系列是一个巨大的运行时艺术品,它作为一个完全在链上的虚拟世界存在。

尽管如此,对我来说 Terraforms 最有趣的方面之一是其时间性质。该系列的 NFT 有两种主要模式,“Terrain”和“Daydreaming”,后者有助于延迟或完全阻止虚拟世界的硬编码销毁。

8) Uniswap LP NFTs

不止于小图片,一文盘点值得关注的动态NFT

并非所有可以随时间演变的 NFT 都属于文化板块。在 DeFi 方面,最明显的例子是 Uniswap V3 中的流动性提供者(LP)仓位,所有这些仓位都由特定的 NFT 代表,这些 NFT 代表会从以太坊提取数据并不断呈现该数据。如果您更改仓位的流动性,您的 NFT 将自动反映这一变化。

Lecturas Relacionadas

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbitHace 3 min(s)

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbitHace 3 min(s)

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片