'A Pyramid of Deceit': Prosecutors Begin Closing Argument in Sam Bankman-Fried Fraud Trial

CoinDeskPolicyPublicado a 2023-10-31Actualizado a 2023-11-01

Resumen

The U.S. Department of Justice is hoping the four-week case will lead to a conviction on seven charges.

Sam Bankman-Fried "told a story, and he lied to you," a federal prosecutor said Wednesday in his closing argument against the FTX founder.

The U.S. Department of Justice is wrapping up its case against Bankman-Fried after nearly five weeks. Assistant U.S. Attorney Nicholas Roos, who is presenting the DOJ's denouement, opened by noting that there was "no dispute" that billions of dollars worth of customer funds from the FTX crypto exchange were gone. Bankman-Fried faces two counts of wire fraud and five counts of conspiracy tied to the operation and collapse of FTX and Alameda Research, Bankman-Fried's trading firm.

"This is a pyramid of deceit by the defendant built on lies and false promises," he said.

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

Roos asked the jury to keep three questions in mind as they review the evidence: where the money went, what happened and who was responsible, repeating these questions several times.

"Now that you've seen all the evidence and heard all testimonies, you know the answer," Roos said, pointing to Bankman-Fried. "This man," the prosecutor said. "The defendant is responsible."

Read all of CoinDesk's SBF trial coverage here.

Bankman-Fried's former employees quit when they learned about the missing money, and his fellow executives testified that they didn't know customer funds were being misused until it was too late, Roos said.

"Their understanding was customer funds were not allowed to be used by FTX or anyone else," he said. "Customer funds belonged to customers."

Roos pointed to witness testimony and Bankman-Fried's own turn on the stand, saying the defendant morphed into a "different person" when answering the DOJ's questions as opposed to defense attorney Mark Cohen's.

"He came up with a tale," Roos said, asking the jury if they noticed how during cross-examination, Bankman-Fried couldn't remember details, whereas during the direct examination, he frequently described situations from his life. "You'd have to ignore the evidence to believe his story."

Both the prosecution and the defense rested their respective cases between the end of last week and Tuesday. Closing arguments are expected to last through all of Wednesday, with the DOJ potentially presenting a rebuttal argument as well at the end of the day or on Thursday.

A D V E R T I S E M E N T

Court got off to a rough start Wednesday with a juror running late, followed by the session needing to be delayed due to technical issues with some of the monitors that display exhibits.

Bankman-Fried's parents arrived at the Manhattan courthouse close to 9 a.m., but appear to have left the courtroom prior to Roos beginning his presentation.

Story continues below

Recommended for you:

Sam Kessler contributed reporting.

Edited by Nick Baker and Marc Hochstein.

Lecturas Relacionadas

NVIDIA's New Open-Source MoE: One Line of Import, Fine-Tuning Accelerated by 3.7x

NVIDIA has open-sourced NeMo AutoModel, a tool designed to significantly accelerate the fine-tuning of Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) large language models. By adding just one import line to existing code based on Hugging Face Transformers v5, users can achieve a 3.4x to 3.7x increase in training throughput and reduce GPU memory usage by 29% to 32% without altering their API. The key innovations include Expert Parallelism (EP) to distribute expert weights across GPUs, lowering memory pressure; DeepEP to fuse computation and communication; and TransformerEngine kernels for accelerated core operations. Benchmarks on models like Qwen3-30B-A3B show training throughput per GPU jumping from 3075 to 11340 tokens per second. The solution also enables the fine-tuning of very large models, such as the 550B parameter Nemotron 3 Ultra, which would exceed memory limits with the standard Transformers v5. Code and benchmarks are available on GitHub.

marsbitHace 24 min(s)

NVIDIA's New Open-Source MoE: One Line of Import, Fine-Tuning Accelerated by 3.7x

marsbitHace 24 min(s)

How to Detect AI-Generated Videos? A Review of Dynamic, Traceable, and Explainable Detection Systems

**How to Detect AI-Generated Videos: A Survey on Dynamic, Traceable, and Explainable Detection Systems** With rapid advances in AI video generation (e.g., Sora, Veo), creating highly realistic, multi-minute videos is now possible, widening the gap with detection research. Current AI video detection, often limited to unreliable binary classifications, is insufficient. This survey, accepted at ACL 2026, reframes the goal as **"factual fidelity verification"**—checking if a video's content (who, when, where, what) aligns with the real world perceptually and cognitively. It categorizes AI-generated videos into three paradigms: **Local Manipulation Videos (LMV**, e.g., face swaps), **Audio-Visual Editing (AVE**, e.g., lip-syncing), and **Generative Video Synthesis (GVS**, fully synthetic videos like Sora's). Detection challenges evolve from visual artifacts in LMV to multi-modal inconsistencies in AVE and higher-level world knowledge violations in GVS. The core proposal is a **Vision-Language Dual-View framework** with four hierarchical layers: 1. **Layer 1 (Intrinsic Visual Cues):** Analyzes low-level signal statistics, noise patterns, and physiological signals. 2. **Layer 2 (Spatiotemporal Consistency):** Checks for temporal coherence in object motion and scene dynamics. 3. **Layer 3 (Cross-Modal Consistency):** Verifies alignment between video, audio, and text within the video. 4. **Layer 4 (Language-Guided World-Level Reasoning):** Uses external knowledge, facts, and physical laws to judge semantic plausibility and factual correctness. The survey traces a shift in detection focus from lower layers (1 & 2) toward higher, language-involved layers (3 & 4). It also reviews evolving evaluation metrics and datasets tailored for each video paradigm. The conclusion advocates for a **dynamic, evidence-first detection system** that moves beyond simple classification. Future trustworthy detection requires combining visual evidence (from CV) with semantic reasoning and explanation (from NLP & multimodal AI), ultimately creating traceable and explainable judgments about a video's adherence to real-world constraints.

marsbitHace 26 min(s)

How to Detect AI-Generated Videos? A Review of Dynamic, Traceable, and Explainable Detection Systems

marsbitHace 26 min(s)

It Turns Out the First Real-World Application of AI x Crypto is in Security Auditing

The article explores the surprising trend where AI's first major impact on crypto has been in security auditing, not in areas like trading or analytics. It details how AI-powered tools are dramatically lowering the barrier to finding smart contract vulnerabilities, enabling attackers to scan thousands of contracts and execute exploits within minutes. This has rendered traditional, manually-produced audit reports with their month-long validity periods increasingly obsolete, creating a critical "structural crack" in the old security model. Cases like Drift Protocol and KelpDAO show that even extensively audited protocols can be hacked through social engineering, operational flaws, or infrastructure misconfigurations beyond pure code review. Attackers are also using AI to find and exploit vulnerabilities in years-old, deployed contracts. Notably, OpenZeppelin's co-founder has expressed a grim view that "all DeFi is insecure" due to AI's asymmetric advantage. In response, the audit industry is undergoing a fundamental shift. While there's a short-term spike in defensive re-audits, the long-term business model is changing. Firms are developing AI-assisted systems and moving from one-time report deliveries towards embedded, continuous services like real-time monitoring and formal verification. Examples include AI tools uncovering critical, previously missed vulnerabilities in heavily audited protocols like Curve Finance and Zcash. The conclusion is that security must become a continuous investment, not a one-time checkbox, and audit firms must rapidly evolve their tools and service models to survive.

marsbitHace 32 min(s)

It Turns Out the First Real-World Application of AI x Crypto is in Security Auditing

marsbitHace 32 min(s)

Never expected that the first tangible application of AI x Crypto is in security auditing

Unexpectedly, the initial major application of AI in the Crypto sphere has turned out to be security auditing. In 2026, DeFi has faced significant security challenges, with 121 hacking incidents resulting in approximately $942 million in losses. While AI was expected to first impact areas like quantitative trading, its initial breakthrough has instead transformed security auditing by drastically lowering the cost and skill barrier for finding smart contract vulnerabilities. The traditional audit model is facing obsolescence. Advanced AI models, such as Claude Mythos, enable attackers to scan thousands of contracts and identify vulnerability patterns at scale, compressing the time from discovery to execution to mere minutes. This renders the month-long validity of traditional audit reports ineffective. Notably, attacks now frequently target well-audited, established protocols by exploiting business logic flaws, operational security weaknesses, and even years-old historical contracts, demonstrating that old audit reports offer zero protection. This pressure is forcing a fundamental shift in the industry. In the short term, a wave of defensive re-auditing is occurring, driven by projects seeking to meet new AI-era security standards and regulatory requirements. In the long run, audit firms' business models are diverging. The one-time report delivery model is declining in value, as evidenced by platforms like Code4rena shutting down. Leading firms are now pivoting towards AI-powered defense, integrating continuous monitoring, real-time on-chain risk detection, and embedding security directly into the development phase, as seen with tools like OpenZeppelin's Skills system. Ultimately, the era of "audit once, secure forever" is over. Security must become a continuous, embedded infrastructure investment for projects. For audit companies, survival depends on proactively transforming from traditional service providers into platforms offering AI-native, ongoing security solutions.

链捕手Hace 40 min(s)

Never expected that the first tangible application of AI x Crypto is in security auditing

链捕手Hace 40 min(s)

$3M Exploit Hits Polymarket: Users to Receive Full Refunds After Third-Party Breach

Polymarket will fully reimburse users affected by a front-end exploit that stole approximately $3 million in crypto assets. The company stated the incident was not a flaw in its core protocol but a supply chain attack. A compromised third-party vendor injected a malicious script into the platform's front-end for a limited number of users, allowing the attacker to drain funds from about 15 wallets while they interacted with the site. The stolen assets, primarily Polymarket's pUSD stablecoin, were bridged to Ethereum and converted to roughly 1,893 ETH. This marks the second security incident for Polymarket in under two months, following a separate $700,000 loss. The event highlights growing risks associated with third-party dependencies in the crypto industry.

TheNewsCryptoHace 41 min(s)

$3M Exploit Hits Polymarket: Users to Receive Full Refunds After Third-Party Breach

TheNewsCryptoHace 41 min(s)

Trading

Spot