今日币价7/10:比特币继续重新测试 30,000 美元,本周收盘下跌,山寨币小幅下跌

Tap Chi BitcoinPublicado a 2023-07-10Actualizado a 2023-07-10

Resumen

比特币本周收盘下跌,BTC继续重新测试 30,000 美元区域。

比特币本周收盘下跌,BTC继续重新测试 30,000 美元区域。

BTC 价格图表 – 1 周 |来源:TradingView

由于投资者准备迎接周三和周四的一系列通胀数据以及第二季度财报季的开始,股市期货周日晚间上涨。

与道琼斯指数相关的期货合约上涨 38 点,即 0.1%;纳斯达克 100 指数期货上涨 0.01%,标准普尔 500 指数期货上涨约 0.1%。

继上周 ADP 和劳工部就业数据收低后,股市进入新的一周。尽管非农就业增长有所放缓,但投资者表示经济仍不稳定,足以让美联储继续加息。

受此影响,上周三大股指全部下跌。标准普尔 500 指数下跌 1.16%,纳斯达克综合指数和道琼斯工业平均指数分别下跌 0.92% 和 1.96%。

投资者还将关注本周的季度收益报告。金融巨头贝莱德、摩根大通、富国银行和花旗都将公布第二季度财报并拉开序幕。

在近期比特币反弹并成功突破 30,000 美元阻力位之后,市场目前正处于吸筹阶段。然而,在此期间正在出现显着的信号。

日线图上,自突破30,000美元水平以来,价格已多次测试该水平。虽然该水平迄今为止提供了支撑,但 RSI 出现看跌背离的迹象令人担忧。

这表明短期内存在修正或逆转的可能性。如果出现回调,则分别接近 28,000 美元和 26,000 美元的 50 天和 200 天多重移动平均线可能会成为关键支撑位。

相反,如果上行势头持续,那么向 38,000 美元阻力区域移动将成为合乎逻辑的情况。

来源:TradingView

4小时图上,价格最近几周表现出不稳定且不可预测的走势,因此很难确定其未来走向。市场正在再次测试 30,000 美元,如果跌破,可能会跌至 27,500 美元。

RSI相对平稳,徘徊在50大关附近,表明买家或卖家明显缺乏主导地位。 30,000 美元关键区域附近的持续战斗进一步加剧了市场近期的不确定性。

来源:TradingView

比特币最近的看涨走势引发了关于市场参与者是为了获利而出售比特币还是选择持有更长时间的讨论。

通过分析交易所的比特币储备指数,我们可以更好地了解投资者的行为。该指标的增加表明投资者正在将资金存入交易所,并有可能出售资金。相反,下跌表明投资者正在从交易所撤回比特币,表明他们希望长期持有这些资金。

最近的数据显示,过去一个月交易所的比特币储备数据大幅下降。这种下跌表明了市场参与者的乐观情绪,因为他们预计价格将进一步上涨并倾向于保留资金。

来源:CryptoQuant

在山寨币方面,市场小幅下跌,比特币本周收盘下跌,并再次重新测试 30,000 美元区域。

过去一周,大多数山寨币都出现亏损,抹去了前一周几乎所有的涨幅。

简而言之,像 Conflux (CFX)、Fantom (FTM)、NEAR Protocol (NEAR)、 比特币 SV (BSV)、Pepe (PEPE)、Solana (SOL)、WOO Network (WOO)、Litecoin (LTC)、eCash ( XEC)、The Graph (GRT)、EOS (EOS)……全部一下子从 3% 下降到 6%。

资料来源:Coinmarketcap

在 1,900 美元区域上方被拒绝后,以太坊(ETH) 仍在努力捍卫 1,850 美元区域,因为过去三天​​价格走势似乎在该区域附近持平。按市值计算第二大加密资产目前交易价格约为 1,856 美元,24 小时内小幅下跌 0.6%。

ETH 价格图表 – 1 小时 |来源:TradingView

Lecturas Relacionadas

Fei-Fei Li's Team Clarifies the Concept of 'World Models', Sora Merely a Renderer

"World Models" has become a widely used yet confusing term in AI. To address this, a team led by Fei-Fei Li and World Labs proposed a functional taxonomy based on the Partially Observable Markov Decision Process framework. This taxonomy categorizes systems called "world models" into three distinct projections: Renderers, Simulators, and Planners. Renderers, like OpenAI's Sora and other video generation models, focus on producing photorealistic visual outputs for human perception. They prioritize visual fidelity over physical accuracy. Simulators, such as NVIDIA Omniverse, aim to compute precise future environmental states for computational tasks like engineering analysis or digital twins. Planners, like Vision-Language-Action models, take in observations and goals to output executable actions for robots or agents. The article clarifies that most current "world models," including Sora, are primarily Renderers. They generate convincing visuals but lack the core ability to simulate state transitions based on actions, a key requirement for a true world model in classic reinforcement learning definitions. This conceptual confusion has practical implications, leading to potential misalignment in technology selection, investment, and public understanding of AI capabilities. Clear categorization is crucial. It helps enterprises avoid costly mistakes (e.g., using a renderer for robot training), allows investors to accurately assess markets, and enables researchers to build comparable benchmarks. While future systems may integrate these functions, recognizing current boundaries is essential for honest assessment and progress.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Fei-Fei Li's Team Clarifies the Concept of 'World Models', Sora Merely a Renderer

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Bloomberg Uncovered: How Do China's Wealthy Circumvent the Annual $50,000 Limit to Transfer Assets?

**Summary: How Wealthy Chinese Circumvent $50,000 Annual Foreign Exchange Limits** Despite China's strict capital controls, including an annual $50,000 per person foreign exchange quota, an estimated $150 billion in funds still leaves the country annually via various gray and underground channels. This report outlines the evolution of China's "capital wall" and the methods used to bypass it. **The Evolving Capital Controls:** * **Foundation (1994):** The system of "current account convertibility with strict capital account controls" was established. * **Quota Set (2007):** The $50,000 individual annual forex purchase limit was formalized. * **Crackdown Begins (2015-2017):** Following market volatility, enforcement tightened. Banks were required to scrutinize transactions, and channels like using UnionPay cards for Hong Kong insurance premiums or buying overseas property were blocked. * **Digital & Legal Upgrades (2024-2026):** Enhanced algorithms now flag suspicious patterns (e.g., "smurfing"). The Common Reporting Standard (CRS) provides Chinese tax authorities with data on citizens' offshore accounts. Unlicensed cross-border brokers have been targeted. **Five Primary Methods for Moving Capital:** 1. **Underground Banking / "Hawala" (Duiqiao):** The largest-scale method. No money crosses borders. Clients pay RMB to a domestic account; an overseas associate deposits equivalent foreign currency into the client's offshore account. Risks include high fees, account freezes, and legal penalties. 2. **"Smurfing" or "Ant Moving":** Using multiple individuals' $50,000 quotas to pool funds for one offshore recipient. Increasingly detected by anti-money laundering algorithms. 3. **Trade Invoice Manipulation:** Businesses over-invoice imports or under-invoice exports via offshore shell companies, creating a pretext to transfer excess funds abroad under the guise of trade. 4. **Channel Migration:** After a crackdown on internet brokers, funds flow toward more compliant but costly channels like major banks' cross-border wealth management services or Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) quotas. 5. **Structural Arrangements:** High-net-worth individuals use complex, high-cost legal structures involving offshore trusts, insurance, and investment migration programs to transfer asset ownership. **Regulatory Response: Focusing on People, Not Just Money** The current strategy extends oversight from enterprises to **individual residents**. Tools like CRS allow retroactive visibility into offshore assets. Cryptocurrencies, once seen as a potential loophole, are now actively monitored and prosecuted as an illegal channel. The underlying driver remains: with significant wealth concentrated among millions of affluent households seeking diversification amid domestic economic shifts, the incentive to move assets offshore persists despite regulatory barriers.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Bloomberg Uncovered: How Do China's Wealthy Circumvent the Annual $50,000 Limit to Transfer Assets?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片