BTC Long Squeeze: $385 Mln Positions Liquidated As Bitcoin Slumps

CoingapePublicado a 2022-04-12Actualizado a 2022-04-12

Resumen

Bitcoin’s (BTC) latest tumble appeared to have blindsided investors hoping that the cryptocurrency would find a bottom.

Bitcoin’s (BTC) latest tumble appeared to have blindsided investors hoping that the cryptocurrency would find a bottom. Liquidations of long positions reached their highest level since late-January, as BTC extended its losses.
BTC slumped below $40,000 for the first time since mid-March, following signals from the U.S. government that inflation is expected to get substantially worse in the country. March consumer price data due later today is set to come in at its highest level in 40 years.
The broader crypto market also tumbled, with most top altcoins shedding between 2% to 8% in the past 24 hours.  Total crypto market capitalization sank by $150 billion in the past week, and was below $2 trillion once again this year. 
$385 million worth of long positions liquidated
The crypto market saw $385 million worth of long positions liquidated in the past 24 hours, data from Coinglass showed. Nearly 90% of all liquidations that occurred overnight were long, indicating that a majority of traders had been positioning for a recovery.
Of the $442 million total liquidations that occurred, only $57 million were short. BTC saw $142 million longs liquidated, about 87% of total closures.  The largest single liquidation order was on Bitmex, valued at $10 million. 

Crypto liquidations spike as BTC slumps

BTC’s sharp fall from 2022 highs has largely burnt traders betting on a crypto recovery. Last week also saw an elevated number of long positions being closed.
The losses come in line with broader risk markets, especially stocks. They underline the high amount of correlation between crypto and equities.
Markets search for a BTC bottom
BTC’s recent tumble has spurred speculation over where the losses will end. Some traders speculate that $37,000 to $38,000 will be the token’s next support level, while others warn that the token could go as low as $30,000.
BTC’s lowest level this year is around $33,000- one that could be considered as a hard support level. Any falls below that would likely spell an extended bear market for the world’s largest cryptocurrency.

Lecturas Relacionadas

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Summary: This article explores the perceived "death spiral" risk between MicroStrategy (MSTR), its Bitcoin holdings, and its perpetual preferred stock (STRC), drawing comparisons to the LUNA-UST collapse. While both systems feature price anchors, high yields for holders, and potential feedback loops, their core mechanisms differ fundamentally. The MSTR-STRC structure relies on continuous financing to sustain its high dividend payouts, primarily through stock ATM offerings. A negative feedback cycle could occur: falling MSTR stock price makes raising equity capital harder, increasing pressure to sell Bitcoin, which undermines STRC confidence and further depresses MSTR. However, unlike LUNA-UST's automated, direct linkage, the MSTR-STRC loop is weaker and has brakes: STRC dividends can be deferred or rates lowered, and STRC holders have a $100/share liquidation preference in bankruptcy, providing a price floor. The company's sustainability hinges on its ability to continue financing. Its current ~$900 million USD reserves cover only about 6.3 months of its ~$1.71 billion annual interest/dividend burden. The next six months are critical, aligning with both the potential bottom in Bitcoin's four-year cycle and the depletion timeline of its reserves. While a LUNA-style catastrophic collapse is deemed highly unlikely due to structural differences, the key question is whether MicroStrategy can navigate this period through healthy deleveraging to restart its capital engine.

Foresight NewsHace 11 min(s)

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Foresight NewsHace 11 min(s)

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

MicroStrategy's Debt Risk: A Turning Point in the "Never Sell" Strategy As of June 3, 2026, MicroStrategy holds 843,706 bitcoins (valued at ~$53.1B) but faces significant financial obligations. Its capital structure includes $6.75B in convertible notes and $15.48B in perpetual preferred stock (led by the $8.5B STRC series), creating an annual payout burden of ~$1.71B. With software revenue at only ~$500M, interest and dividend obligations far exceed operating income. A critical shift occurred in late May 2026 when the company sold 32 bitcoins for ~$2.5M to cover dividends, breaking CEO Michael Saylor's long-standing "never sell" pledge. This symbolic move triggered a sharp decline in both Bitcoin's price and MSTR stock, reflecting market fears about cash flow sustainability. The core of the strain is the STRC perpetual preferred stock, designed as a "permanent loan" with no maturity date but requiring high monthly dividends (currently 11.5%). Its business model relies on a three-part cycle: issuing new STRC shares, using proceeds to buy more Bitcoin and fund a USD reserve, and using that reserve to pay dividends. This cycle depends on continuous investor demand for STRC and Bitcoin's price appreciation. Analysis shows Bitcoin needs to appreciate at least 2.3% annually to cover the $1.71B in yearly obligations at current holdings. With Bitcoin price down ~22% from March 2026 highs, this pressure has intensified. The company's $900M USD reserve can only cover about 7 months of payments if STRC issuance stalls. Key risks are not immediate bankruptcy or forced Bitcoin liquidation (as BTC is not collateral), but rather: 1) The erosion of MSTR's premium to its Bitcoin holdings (mNAV), which would cripple its ability to raise cheap capital; 2) A vicious cycle where stagnant Bitcoin prices reduce STRC demand, draining the USD reserve and forcing BTC sales, further depressing prices. The period from February 2027 to September 2028 is a crucial test, with over $5.9B in convertible notes facing put options or maturity. In essence, MicroStrategy has evolved from a simple Bitcoin holder into a complex financial entity acting like a "private Bitcoin bank," leveraging its BTC holdings to create layered financial products. Its survival depends on maintaining Bitcoin's price trend, its stock premium, and market appetite for its preferred shares. The recent token sale marks not a betrayal of its Bitcoin thesis, but an admission that the leveraged strategy must eventually be paid for.

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

Anthropic Cries Wolf: Is the AGI Threat Real, or Just an IPO Story?

Anthropic has published an article titled "When AI builds itself," discussing the emerging concept of "recursive self-improvement," where AI begins to actively participate in designing, training, testing, and optimizing its own subsequent versions. The company presents internal data showing that by May 2026, over 80% of code merged into its codebase was written by Claude, its AI model. Claude's capabilities have expanded to handling complex, open-ended engineering tasks, achieving a 76% success rate in such areas, and even contributing to research processes, such as optimizing code performance and conducting AI safety experiments. Anthropic outlines an evolution from human-driven development to AI-assisted workflows, culminating in the current stage where AI agents can autonomously write, run, and delegate code. The company cautions that the path toward a "closed loop," where AI continuously improves itself, is becoming visible. It calls for coordinated global mechanisms to potentially slow or pause frontier AI development to allow safety research and societal structures to catch up. However, the timing of this warning coincides with Anthropic's preparations for an IPO, framing the narrative not just as a safety concern but also as a demonstration of Claude's advanced capabilities and its integral role in accelerating Anthropic's own R&D—creating a potential "flywheel" effect for competitive advantage. This contrasts with OpenAI's recent, more policy-oriented discussion of the same risks, highlighting the competitive dynamics in the AI industry as companies position themselves in both the technological and regulatory landscape.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Anthropic Cries Wolf: Is the AGI Threat Real, or Just an IPO Story?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片