Azuki引发众怒,昨夜新系列发售到底发生了什么?

区块律动Publicado a 2023-06-28Actualizado a 2023-06-28

Resumen

对NFT市场和Azuki社区来说,这是一场重大的打击


原文来源: @0xwill_eth & @LambolandNFT 


醒来发现 Azuki Elementals 刷屏了,昨夜的发售出现了哪些问题?一文总结下。






1. mint 时间 


Azuki holder 只有 10 分钟的时间去 mint,导致短时间内网站流量超载,直接崩溃,很多人没有打到,对此 Azuki 官方给出了不痛不痒的回应。  









  很多知名的 azuki 鲸鱼都没有打到 。






2. 变相增发 


这就有点搞笑了,Azuki elementals 的画风和元素几乎和一代一模一样,开图后社区人都傻了,甚至还有把 Azuki 当成 Elemental 卖掉的倒霉蛋。









 3. 做工粗糙 


有些 elementals 的图片貌似出现了绘图过程中的低级错误。







4. 项目方疑似 Rug 


这是最关键的,导致很多社区 hloder 不满,发售结束,项目方直接将 2 万个 ETH 直接转走,这操作让人直接懵逼,这是一线蓝筹的格局??  






5. 令人迷惑的定价 


elemental 2e 的定价,一方面严重压缩了一代 Azuki 的价值,同样的图,15e 和 2e 你买哪个?另一方面,也降低了小豆子的需求。  






6. 社区和 NFT 市场信心受挫 


对 NFT 市场和 Azuki 社区来说,这是一场重大的打击,很多 Azuki 中文社区的 KOL 都表达了不满,也有很多为了获得 mint 资格去买小豆子的,结果现在小豆子价格暴跌,小豆子的长期 holder 莫名躺枪。  









以上素材来自海外 KOL @LambolandNFT的整理我做了修改梳理,增加了中文社区的反馈内容。  


原文链接

Lecturas Relacionadas

Claude Code Introduces Dynamic Workflows: Enabling AI to Form Teams and Collaborate

Claude Code introduces dynamic workflows, enabling AI to coordinate teams of specialized agents for complex tasks. This transforms Claude from a code assistant into a programmable workbench. Workflows address key limitations of single-agent systems: agentic laziness (premature task completion), self-preferential bias (favoring own outputs), and goal drift (losing sight of original objectives). The system allows Claude to dynamically create execution frameworks using JavaScript. It can split tasks, dispatch parallel agents for isolated work (e.g., in separate worktrees), implement adversarial validation, run tournaments, and synthesize results. This multi-agent approach is valuable for tasks requiring deep research, factual verification, code migration, root cause analysis, large-scale triage, and qualitative sorting. Key patterns include: classify-and-route, fan-out-and-synthesize, adversarial verification, generate-and-filter, tournaments, and loop-until-done. While token usage is higher, workflows excel where tasks resemble programming—needing problem decomposition, isolated context, hypothesis testing, and handling many details. They extend Claude Code's utility beyond technical work to areas like business plan review, resume screening, and naming brainstorm. The feature is not a universal solution but points to a future where AI tool competitiveness depends on organizing reliable, reusable, and auditable execution flows for complex goals.

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

Claude Code Introduces Dynamic Workflows: Enabling AI to Form Teams and Collaborate

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

Hyperliquid, Wall Street's 24/7 Trading Convenience Store

Hyperliquid: The 24/7 Trading "Convenience Store" for Wall Street Hyperliquid, a decentralized cryptocurrency exchange, has become a go-to platform for Wall Street traders seeking to trade around the clock, especially during traditional market closures. Founded by Jeff Yan, a former quantitative trader, after the FTX collapse, the platform emphasizes user self-custody of assets. It offers a wide range of perpetual contracts—leveraged derivatives with no expiry—on assets from Bitcoin and crude oil to the S&P 500 and even pre-IPO companies like SpaceX. A notable example involves a hedge fund trader who capitalized on geopolitical news over a weekend, securing a 243% return on oil derivatives before markets reopened. The platform, run by just 11 employees, generated approximately $800 million in revenue last year, and its native token HYPE has seen significant growth. Its rise highlights the merging of traditional finance and crypto. While U.S. users are currently restricted, recent CFTC rule changes could open access. The platform is known for its transparency, having processed $10 billion in liquidations during a market crash while competitors faltered. Regulators warn of the high risks and complexity of perpetual contracts for retail investors. Key to its appeal is a strong community culture, direct engagement with founders, and a simple interface. Despite rules against VPN use, it attracts global users with its permissionless approach. Hyperliquid plans to expand into prediction markets and options, aiming to eventually host all financial activity.

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

Hyperliquid, Wall Street's 24/7 Trading Convenience Store

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

Who Funds the Agents?

**Summary: Who Funds AI Agents?** OpenAI recently shut down a feature allowing AI agents to shop for users, highlighting the challenge of creating a secure and regulated environment for agent-driven transactions. While payment infrastructure exists, a crucial governance layer—defining spending limits, fraud detection, tax handling, and return policies—is largely missing. The potential is enormous: AI agents already processed $73M across 176M transactions last year, with McKinsey forecasting this could grow to $3-5T in global consumer commerce by 2030. The core competition isn't just about processing payments, which can be very cheap (especially with crypto-based settlement), but about controlling the rules that govern agent spending. Key players like Stripe and Coinbase are racing to dominate this governance layer. Stripe's acquisition of wallet provider Privy allows it to set spending policies, identity checks, and human-in-the-loop approvals directly at the wallet level. Similarly, Coinbase's stack, including its x402 protocol and AgentKit, embeds governance rules. This vertical integration across settlement, wallet, and governance layers is becoming the dominant strategy. Control over the governance layer is where significant future value lies. If agents handle trillions in transactions, even a small fee for managing compliance, fraud prevention, and policy enforcement could generate billions in annual revenue. The companies that successfully integrate across the payment stack will capture value from idle agent balances, transaction fees, and governance services, positioning themselves as the foundational banks of the AI agent economy.

marsbitHace 35 min(s)

Who Funds the Agents?

marsbitHace 35 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片