比特币可能会反弹

CoindeskPublicado a 2023-04-26Actualizado a 2023-04-26

Resumen

与此同时,CoinDesk 比特币趋势指标从 0.5(上升趋势)下降到 0(中性),进一步凸显了近期价格走势的停顿。

比特币连续第三天的负交易与技术指标一致,表明比特币的价格可能再次上涨,至少在短期内是这样。

比特币 (BTC) 的价格自 4 月 14 日突破 30,000 美元的重要心理关口以来已回撤 9%。以太 (ETH) 在达到 2,100 美元以上的峰值后同期下跌了 14%。

从技术上讲,有几件事很突出:

30,000 美元的价格清楚地表明了阻力。比特币和以太币的支撑或阻力往往集中在大整数附近,因为交易者通常在以 0 或 5 结尾的点下买卖订单。

比特币达到 30,000 美元,与当时布林带的上限保持一致。

比特币的交易区间在开盘价和收盘价之间收缩至 0.0005%,因为它达到了区间上限,这意味着买卖双方对其价格感到满意。

布林带绘制资产的 20 天移动平均线,并计算高于和低于平均线的两个标准差。由于资产价格预计在 98% 的时间里保持在平均水平的两个标准差范围内,因此突破任何一个水平都被认为是值得关注的事件。

在最近的这个案例中,违规行为与可能的心理阻力点同时发生。投资者通常最关心接下来会发生什么。

最近的下跌伴随着预期的势头下降,但它也伴随着向布林带下端的移动而发生。 BTC 的相对强度指数 (RSI) 从 71.54 下降至目前的 42.53,表明势头下降。

从 2015 年 1 月到今天,比特币的 RSI 位于 42 和 45 之间,共 163 次,发生后 30 天的平均表现为 6%。

未来七日表现历来持平,涨幅仅为0.63%。

与此同时,比特币接近其布林带下限引发了一个问题,即价格是会跌破该关口,还是会保持在置信区间内并走高。

鉴于最近的历史,技术分析师可能预计BTC价格将有条不紊地回升至 20 日均线。在技术调整的时刻,比特币的 20 天移动平均线比当前价格高出约 6%。

与此同时,CoinDesk 比特币趋势指标从 0.5(上升趋势)下降到 0(中性),进一步凸显了近期价格走势的停顿。

比特币趋势指标 04/25/23 (CoinDesk)

Lecturas Relacionadas

The 800x Golden Dog, "Gacha" Saves NFT Trading

Title: 800x Golden Dog: How 'Gacha' Mechanics Are Rescuing NFT Trading In the past month, the on-chain TCG (Trading Card Game) narrative, centered around "gacha" or loot box mechanics, has emerged as a major crypto-native revenue generator, second only to platforms like Hyperliquid and pump.fun. Recently, this trend hit Ethereum with Fake World Assets (FWA). Within just over a week, FWA generated approximately $1.3 million in revenue, ranking 15th in the past week's crypto app earnings. Its token, $FWA, surged from an initial market cap of ~$47,550 to a peak of ~$38.8 million—an 800x gain. Meanwhile, Collector Cards' token $CARDS declined significantly from its previous highs. FWA, developed by the team behind "PunkStrategy," operates as an NFT gacha system with a built-in token flywheel. Users deposit NFTs paired with ETH as liquidity into pools. Each deposit creates a personal pool; more ETH deposited lowers the chance of the NFT being "won" in a draw. Players spend ETH to "draw" (gacha). If they get an undesirable NFT, they can instantly sell it back to the original depositor at an 85% discount, generating income for the depositor. A 1% fee is taken on each draw and on depositor earnings when an NFT is kept. The key to FWA's momentum is its token $FWA. It cannot be bought directly externally. The primary way to acquire it is by playing the gacha and choosing to receive $FWA (instead of ETH) when selling back an unwanted NFT. This mechanism creates constant buy pressure for $FWA as players engage, especially during its price ascent. Early participants who held $FWA benefited massively from subsequent inflows. This contrasts with projects like Collector Cards, which, despite strong revenues, suffer from perceived low token utility beyond buybacks. In conclusion, while FWA's flywheel design—linking speculative token gains directly to NFT trading activity—has driven rapid growth, its sustainability is questionable. The model relies heavily on continuous $FWA price appreciation to offset the inherent negative expectancy of each draw. When price momentum stalls, activity will likely decline. The case highlights that in crypto markets, pure profitability narratives can be fleeting; understanding the relationship between attention, token buy pressure, and sustainable mechanics is crucial to avoid speculative pitfalls.

marsbitHace 24 min(s)

The 800x Golden Dog, "Gacha" Saves NFT Trading

marsbitHace 24 min(s)

The Quantum Computing Threat Approaches, Cryptocurrency May Be Exposed to Risks Before Banks

Quantum computing poses a significant threat to all cryptographic systems, including banks and governments, but decentralized cryptocurrencies with public ledgers like Bitcoin are likely the first practical target. Experts warn that a cryptographically relevant quantum computer (CRQC), capable of running Shor's algorithm to break the elliptic curve cryptography securing most crypto wallets, could emerge around 2029. Recent research shows the required quantum resources for such attacks are shrinking dramatically, potentially enabling key extraction in minutes. The core vulnerability for cryptocurrencies is not the cryptography itself—post-quantum standards are being developed—but the slow, decentralized governance required to implement upgrades. Unlike centralized banks that can swiftly transition, Bitcoin needs near-unanimous consensus among its global network, a historically difficult process as seen in past upgrades. Estimates suggest migrating all vulnerable Bitcoin funds could take at least 76 days of dedicated network time, and it must be completed before a CRQC exists to prevent "now-or-never" attacks on exposed keys. The threat is not binary; it begins when a quantum computer can decrypt data before it loses value, not necessarily in real-time. A significant portion of Bitcoin (estimated at millions of coins) already has public keys permanently exposed on-chain, making them vulnerable to eventual "static attacks." While technical solutions exist, the race is against time for decentralized networks to coordinate a defensive transition, serving as an early warning for the broader financial system.

marsbitHace 35 min(s)

The Quantum Computing Threat Approaches, Cryptocurrency May Be Exposed to Risks Before Banks

marsbitHace 35 min(s)

On the First Day of Listing, Changxin Technology's Market Value Exceeds 3 Trillion Yuan, Which Securities Firm Has the Largest Floating Profit?

On July 27th, Changxin Technology, the largest-ever IPO on China's STAR Market, debuted with its share price soaring 465.82% to close at 49 yuan. Its market capitalization reached 3.28 trillion yuan, instantly making it the most valuable A-share company. The stellar performance delivered substantial gains for involved securities firms, primarily through equity investments rather than underwriting fees. China Merchants Securities emerged as the biggest winner. Its direct investment subsidiary, Zhaozheng Investment, alone holds a 0.54% pre-issue stake, translating to a paper profit exceeding 155 billion yuan based on the first-day closing price—surpassing the firm's entire 2025 net profit of 123.5 billion yuan. Other major beneficiaries include Huaan Securities, with an estimated profit of around 123 billion yuan from its 0.44% stake, and the lead underwriters, CICC and CITIC Securities, which each gained approximately 46 billion yuan from mandatory follow-on investments. Firms like Founder Securities, Haitong Securities, and GF Securities also reported significant holdings valued in the billions. Despite these paper gains, shares of some brokerages like Huaan and China Merchants fell on the listing day, reflecting broader market pressures. Analysts remain bullish on Changxin's long-term prospects, citing the AI-driven demand surge for DRAM (Dynamic Random-Access Memory) and a supportive supply-demand dynamic with projected shortages through 2028. As China's largest and most advanced integrated DRAM designer and manufacturer, Changxin is poised to capture growth from domestic substitution and global market shifts, potentially challenging the current "big three" oligopoly (Samsung, SK Hynix, Micron). The IPO proceeds, focused on capacity upgrades and R&D, are expected to accelerate China's semiconductor self-sufficiency.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

On the First Day of Listing, Changxin Technology's Market Value Exceeds 3 Trillion Yuan, Which Securities Firm Has the Largest Floating Profit?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Will Changxin Technology Continue to Rise Today?

Changxin Technology made a historic debut on the stock market, with its share price soaring 465.82% to close at 49 yuan. Its market capitalization reached 3.28 trillion yuan, surpassing Industrial and Commercial Bank of China to become the largest company by market cap on the A-share market. Daily trading volume exceeded 140 billion yuan, a first in A-share history. This created a moment of realization for 7.7 million investors who won the lottery for its shares. On the first day, investor strategies varied: some sold immediately and later regretted missing intraday highs, others secured profits to avoid future volatility, while a third group held or even bought more shares, betting on long-term growth. The staggering IPO, massive public enthusiasm, and debut during a peak industry cycle led some to compare Changxin to PetroChina's 2007 listing, which was followed by a long decline. Key similarities noted include comparable fundraising scales (approx. 666 billion yuan for Changxin vs. 668 billion for PetroChina) and both companies listing at a perceived high point in their respective commodity cycles (oil then, memory chips now). However, analysts caution against over-simplifying the comparison. They highlight core differences: Changxin operates in the high-growth semiconductor sector with strong "domestic substitution" tailwinds. Brokerages like Huaxi Securities project significant revenue and profit growth from 2026 to 2028, driven by DDR5 adoption, product mix optimization, and economies of scale. Nomura Securities issued a "buy" rating with a 116 yuan target price, citing AI-driven demand for DRAM, tight supply as major players shift to HBM production, and Changxin's vast room for market share growth. Some analysts position the current memory cycle, fueled by AI, as just beginning, contrasting with the mature energy cycle PetroChina entered. The article concludes that for investors, monitoring the memory cycle's progression and Changxin's breakthroughs in high-end technologies like HBM will be crucial, rather than relying on superficial historical parallels.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Will Changxin Technology Continue to Rise Today?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片