Shanghai Upgrade – How It Could Affect Ethereum and LSD Tokens

dailyhodlPublicado a 2023-04-21Actualizado a 2023-04-21

Resumen

On April 12, 2023, the Ethereum chain rolled out the Shanghai upgrade. The update implemented...

On April 12, 2023, the Ethereum chain rolled out the Shanghai upgrade.
The update implemented a series of proposals, namely EIP 3651, also known as ‘Warm Coinbase,’ that decreased the gas fees for transactions that go through the Coinbase address, EIP 6049, proposing an improvement of security and reliability to the smart contract and the much-anticipated EIP 4895 that enabled staking withdrawals on Ethereum.
In the piece below, we will explore how the upgrade may affect the price of Ethereum and LSD (liquid staking derivatives) projects and tokens in the long run.
Exploring the background
To better understand the upgrade, we begin by closely examining the problem it aims to solve.
In December 2020, Ethereum went through an upgrade from the PoW (proof-of-work) system to PoS (proof-of-stake) consensus mechanism in an event better known as ‘The Merge.’
Ethereum has achieved relative scalability with its consensus mechanism, as it no longer employs time consuming problem-solving consensus mechanisms such as Bitcoin’s proof-of-work.
Still, the chain had a downside – stakers couldn’t withdraw their staked Ethereum tokens until a designated deposit period was over.
To solve this issue, some projects have created protocols allowing users to stake Ethereum and benefit from liquidity. These protocols utilize a type of token pegged with Ethereum, called liquid staking derivatives.
Shanghai update – impact on the Ethereum price
The impact of the Shanghai upgrade on the price of Ethereum remains uncertain, and two possible scenarios may occur.
For those bearish on Ethereum, there are concerns about the pressure from the US government towards US-based protocols and cryptocurrency exchanges that offer Ethereum SaaS (staking-as-a-service).
Most recently, Kraken’s announcement on the unstaking of all their Ethereum after being sued by the SEC has set a negative precedent for cryptocurrency exchanges and protocols providing SaaS in the United States.
Additionally, some investors are looking to withdraw their Ethereum and exchange it with fiat currencies to offset the costs and losses from 2022.
Inversely, for those bullish on Ethereum, the Shanghai upgrade is expected to potentially bring significant improvements to the Ethereum network, including faster transaction processing times and reduced fees.
These improvements may attract more users to the network, increasing the demand for Ethereum and driving up its price.
Furthermore, 10% of the entire staking pool can be withdrawn every month, and the time-consuming two-step process in unstaking Ethereum may discourage investors from withdrawing their assets.
It is essential to consider both the potential positives and negatives when evaluating the impact of the Shanghai upgrade on the price of Ethereum.
While there may be some short-term selling pressure from investors looking to withdraw their staked Ethereum, the long-term improvements to the Ethereum network could drive demand and increase the price of Ethereum.
Impact on LSD tokens
Another impact of the upgrade is on LSD protocols. LSD protocols could maintain their peg better after the Ethereum upgrade, leading to lower costs.
These protocols can give a higher APY (annual percentage yield) after the upgrade as derivative tokens become stable – therefore, the rate governance tokens of the protocols have been growing in price.
LDO increased by over 100%, PENDLE grew by over 900%, RPL rose by 120% and the trend continues to increase.
One potential outcome investors have been anticipating is the chance to transfer their recently unstaked Ethereum to LSDs to take advantage of greater profits and the capabilities of decentralized finance.
LSD protocols hold 42% of the total staking volume of the Ethereum network.
This means the upgrade will highly impact the price of the protocol’s governance tokens, derivative tokens and APY.
Each LSD protocol has designed different ways for its users to liquidate their position and will try to redeem all their investors sufficiently.
Investors would also need to learn the liquidating process for protocols they want to invest in, as it will affect the security of these protocols.
Each protocol will have its own liquidating process and affect security – therefore, I highly recommend doing your own research before investing in any LSD protocols.
Ethereum – generating value for the industry
Ethereum as a protocol has helped generate a whole lot of other value through different means across many industries.
While the current Shanghai upgrade will help enhance the overall functionalities of Ethereum and associated protocols, other EVM (Ethereum virtual machine)-compatible blockchain networks will also benefit from the network event.
Though there are still a lot of milestones for Ethereum to cover in order to become a fully functional PoS protocol, the ability to withdraw the staked tokens will bring in institutional money, especially in jurisdictions where regulatory demands are not so strict.
In the meantime, investors and observers will place a keen eye on how Ether as a token – as well as its LSD counterparts – take advantage of these major protocol updates across the board.


Lecturas Relacionadas

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But the Reasons Have Changed

Tidal Investment remains optimistic about the AI industry chain, but the rationale has shifted. The market narrative has changed. While recent large-scale IPOs (e.g., SpaceX) and major fundraising plans by tech giants like Alphabet and Meta have caused some nervousness, this isn't a sign of an AI peak. The focus has moved from the initial question of AI's viability to the sustainability of massive investment cycles. The key players—primarily the major cloud providers—are not slowing down; their capital expenditure (Capex) guidance for 2026 has been increased across the board (e.g., Alphabet to $180B, Amazon to $200B). This investment cycle is proving resilient and difficult to stop. Unlike traditional hardware cycles, current AI Capex is distributed across multiple physical layers—computing, memory, networking, and critically, power infrastructure. Bottlenecks are shifting from chips to elements like electricity, transformers, and cooling systems, which have much longer lead times and cannot be easily pre-built like fiber optics during the dot-com bubble. Supply chain data (e.g., Eaton's 240% YoY data center orders) confirms this broad-based, project-driven expansion. Market concerns are acknowledged but viewed differently. First, while Capex growth currently outpaces revenue growth, raising ROI questions, this mirrors the early scaling phase of cloud computing itself. A change in view would require concrete signals like downward Capex revisions or missed AI product targets, which haven't materialized by mid-2026. Second, comparisons to the 2000 dot-com bust are flawed. That crash was driven by a massive, parallel oversupply of cheap capacity (fiber). The current cycle faces *supply constraints* in critical, capital-intensive physical infrastructure that cannot be overbuilt as easily. In conclusion, the wave of fundraising reflects the next, more complex act of the AI story. Physical bottlenecks and sustained high Capex plans suggest this is not the finale but an ongoing, capital-intensive build-out phase. The script has changed, but the play is far from over.

marsbitHace 45 min(s)

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But the Reasons Have Changed

marsbitHace 45 min(s)

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But for Different Reasons Now

Tidal Investments remains optimistic about the AI industry chain, but the rationale has shifted. The market is concerned about massive concurrent fundraising by tech giants like SpaceX, OpenAI, Alphabet, and Meta, fearing an AI peak. However, the authors argue this signals the next act of AI development, not its end. Capital expenditure (Capex) from major cloud providers (Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, Oracle) continues to surge aggressively into 2026. This investment cycle is more resilient than past hardware cycles due to its scale and complexity. Bottlenecks have shifted from chips to critical physical infrastructure like power grids, transformers, cooling, and data center construction—areas with long lead times and limited capacity for rapid expansion. Supply chain data (e.g., Eaton's orders) confirms substantial, tangible progress. Key market concerns are addressed: 1. **ROI vs. Capex Growth**: While Capex growth outpaces revenue, the authors note cloud giants have historically overcome similar phases through scale. The cycle will only be in danger if Capex guidance is cut, orders are canceled, or AI product demand falters—none of which are currently observed. 2. **Comparison to the 2000 Dot-com Bubble**: Unlike the telecom bubble, where cheap, oversupplied fiber crashed prices, AI infrastructure (especially power) is constrained, customized, and subject to lengthy approvals, making a similar supply glut and crash unlikely. In conclusion, the wave of fundraising reflects the immense, ongoing capital needs for AI's next phase, constrained by slow-moving physical bottlenecks. The AI cycle is not over; the script has simply changed.

链捕手Hace 52 min(s)

Tidal Investment: We Remain Bullish on the AI Industry Chain, But for Different Reasons Now

链捕手Hace 52 min(s)

Grayscale: These 15 Profitable Crypto Protocols Are Severely Undervalued

Grayscale Research identifies 15 top-revenue crypto protocols trading at significant valuation discounts, with many at single-digit or even 1x revenue multiples. Protocols like Pump.fun, PancakeSwap, and Meteora have market capitalizations roughly equal to their annual revenue. The report argues these financially-focused protocols (DEXs, lending, staking) are fundamentally undervalued and could benefit from the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, expected as soon as next month. This legislation aims to clarify digital asset regulation, potentially reducing institutional barriers and driving on-chain activity. The analysis breaks down the protocols into three groups: the "1x Club" (market cap ≈ revenue), mid-tier protocols with 3-9x multiples (e.g., Aave, Lido, Jupiter), and high-multiple protocols like Hyperliquid (15x) and Uniswap (37x), where valuation reflects future potential rather than current cash flows. Grayscale applies a traditional DCF model to Aave, suggesting a one-year price target of ~$175, representing ~130% upside from current levels. The report notes a risk-off macro environment since the Iran conflict has further compressed valuations, creating a potential entry window. The conclusion highlights that while the valuation data presents an intriguing opportunity, the investment thesis is contingent on the CLARITY Act's passage and subsequent institutional capital flows. Investors are cautioned to consider Grayscale's inherent conflict of interest as a crypto asset manager with products tied to these assets.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Grayscale: These 15 Profitable Crypto Protocols Are Severely Undervalued

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Sam Altman's Personal Alchemy of Wealth: Investing in 400 Companies, Over 10 Deeply Tied to OpenAI

The article investigates Sam Altman's personal wealth strategy, centered around his investments in approximately 400 companies while serving as OpenAI's CEO. Despite not holding direct equity in OpenAI, Altman has built a vast portfolio, with at least 10 of his investments having commercial ties or ongoing negotiations with OpenAI. This creates a complex network of potential conflicts of interest, drawing scrutiny from U.S. congressional committees and state attorneys general. Key investments highlighted include the anti-aging startup Retro Biosciences (valued at $258 million for his stake as of late last year) and the chipmaker Cerebras, whose value soared following an OpenAI procurement deal. His most significant financial gain is linked to the nuclear fusion company Helion, where a recent funding round reportedly increased his stake's value to at least $4.1 billion. The article details a decade-long relationship between Altman, Helion, and OpenAI, including a controversial non-binding power purchase agreement and Altman's efforts to secure investments from OpenAI and its backer SoftBank for Helion. Other points include internal investigations at Tools for Humanity (developer of Worldcoin) and OpenAI's massive contracts with tech giants like Nvidia. According to Forbes, Altman's net worth is around $3.4 billion, ranking him 1251st globally—a rise of over 1400 places since 2024. OpenAI's board states that Altman's external dealings are transparent and potential conflicts are carefully managed.

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

Sam Altman's Personal Alchemy of Wealth: Investing in 400 Companies, Over 10 Deeply Tied to OpenAI

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片