[Featured Research]What Has Changed In Crypto Market?

MirrorPublicado a 2023-02-17Actualizado a 2023-02-19

Resumen

What Others Should We Know About The Market?

How crypto market has changed in 2023-- 5 lessons from recent bull run:

A closer look at the January mini bull run and what you can learn from it as an investor/speculator—

1. Rotation no more

Liquidity rotation used to be structural feature of crypto mkt— at onset of a bull run, large caps (BTC, ETH) rose the most & once mkt participants made gains on those, liquidity shifted to smaller caps, prompting them to pump next.

The rotation game is so 2021.

Most recent (mini) bull run in Jan 2023 showed different mkt progression. Once up cycle started in early Jan, it took mere 2 wks for 80%+ of tokens among top 1000 mkt caps to rise above their 40-day moving average.

In contrast, back in 2019 (similar stage of cycle) it took the mkt 3 mos & multiple small hype cycles for 80% of top tokens to rise over 40dma.

In other words, while there was distinctive liquidity rotation back in 2019, it doesn't work that way anymore. Once mkt up trend started everything that can go up goes up almost all at once.

Why the change?

Many reasons. For example—

Token listings on large exchanges have broadened. Mkt participant profiles have shifted & diversified. Rotation game has become public knowledge that everyone now wants to exploit & front run. Plus, a lot more liquidity on sideline now compared to a few yrs ago.

I'll talk abt what this means to you as individual investor in a min.

2. Underdogs lead recovery at market bottom

At mkt turning point coming out of long bear trend, downtrodden names that lead previous downturn also tend to lead subsequent recovery. This is a structural feature in other risk asset mkts as well not just crypto.

Chart below plots % gains in Jan 2023 against % gains in prior yr for mid-cap-and-above tokens (mkt cap > $250 mn). Study the chart & reach your own conclusion. Hopefully it's an obvious one.

Does this relationship hold in other market conditions? No.

This underdog-to-growth-star phenom is unique feature for when mkt has strong reversal from deep bottom.

3. Market cap matters (sort of)

There's significant inverse correlation btw token mkt cap and price gain among smaller cap tokens (<$230 mn mkt cap) during recent up move, after controlling for prior year price gain & age of token.

Among larger cap tokens this relationship does not exist esp in the $250 mn to $10 bn mkt cap range.

In other words conventional wisdom that smaller caps make bigger moves is true to some extent, but only if you're looking among small up-and-coming names, which is not practical for anyone w/ more than a few thousand $ to deploy since those are usually thinly traded.

4. Expect shorter cyclical moves in bear mkt

Bull runs in bear mks have shorter shelf life.

January mini bull run lasted in earnest for a month w/ majority of move done in 1st 2 wks of Jan. You can observe same pattern from previous run-up in July/August 2022.

These are distinctively shorter runs compared to up cycles in a bull mkt. The hostile macro environment means pumps are more fragile & prospect for continued buying demand after an up move is highly uncertain.

5. Rethink what the "fundamentals" mean

This is not a new pattern, but worth your attention b/c it'll persist.

Traditional metrics Wall St uses to evaluate company fundamentals—e.g. sales, earnings, margins— are mostly useless in crypto, at least at this stage.

I know it sounds politically incorrect but the biggest *fundamental* for any token is the amount of attention it can attract. Period.

What attracts attention?

For example:

· Over hyped themes— e.g. AI, zero knowledge, liquid staking.

· Big $ initiatives— e.g. $300 mn developer grants.

· Key personnel changes— e.g. famous so-and-so comes back as CTO.

Here's a list of top gaining tokens in Jan w/ $200 mn+ mkt cap (tokens w/ < 1 yr history excluded). Half have some attention driving narrative at play (aside from the fact, as discussed earlier, most of these are down horrendously bad, which is in itself an attention driver).

Do some research yourself. Can you identify what the driver is on each?

You may think a certain attention grabbing narrative is stupid or unjustified.

Well, first, tell that to the market & see if it cares.

Second, this is actually a rational behavior by the mkt despite appearing otherwise. Crypto projects at current stage are not steady money-making enterprises. They are experimental tech.

All that matters to the fate of experimental techs is whether they'll get mass-adopted. What would be a good predictor of that? The number of eyeballs they attract.

So the phenom of attention/narrative driving prices is really just mkt trying to deduce a project's growth prospect from however little information there is available. It's entirely rational if you ask me.

What all this means for you as an investor/speculator

What can you do to take advantage of evolving mkt features discussed above? A few ideas:

1. Be flexible & nimble when macro conditions are hostile. There'll be bull runs even in worst mkts but you need to act quickly & be vigilant on both entries & exists since these runs'll be more ephemeral than usual.

2. If you wait for rotation from large caps to the rest you'll be front run. There's hardly any rotation anymore. When mkt turns everything goes up together.

3. At mkt turning point out of major down trend, focus on beaten-down underdogs. If your capital size is small, focus on smaller caps as well.

4. Your time may be better spent researching the next attention-driving narratives & themes rather than studying technical analysis. Just sayin' ;)

Lecturas Relacionadas

Trump’s Dual Pressure: When the Iran Deal Meets the Midterm Elections

U.S. President Donald Trump’s efforts to negotiate a deal with Iran are triggering a political backlash within his own Republican Party, as the approach of midterm elections intensifies internal divisions. Reports of a potential agreement—involving a temporary ceasefire, phased sanctions relief, and the unfreezing of Iranian assets in exchange for discussions on Tehran diluting or transferring its stockpile of highly enriched uranium—have drawn sharp criticism from GOP hawks. Key allies like Senators Lindsey Graham and Ted Cruz warned that such concessions could allow Iran to recuperate, undermine recent U.S. military gains, and ultimately strengthen a hostile regime. The dispute highlights a broader political struggle for Trump, who must reconcile his "America First" posture with diplomatic compromise while facing a tough electoral landscape. With Republicans fighting to maintain control of Congress and Trump’s approval ratings declining, the Iran deal has quickly become a test of party loyalty and perceived toughness. Public sparring between Trump aides and critics—including former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo—underscores the internal pressure. While Secretary of State Marco Rubio defended Trump’s historically hardline stance, skeptics like Senator Thom Tillis questioned the logic of any deal that leaves nuclear materials in Iran. The outcome now hinges on whether Trump can persuade his party’s hardliners to accept a negotiated exit.

marsbitHace 2 min(s)

Trump’s Dual Pressure: When the Iran Deal Meets the Midterm Elections

marsbitHace 2 min(s)

Raised $1.3 Billion in Seven Weeks, Yet SpaceX's Weighting Halved: The Dilution Trap of the NASA ETF

A new ETF named NASA, launched just seven weeks ago, has rapidly become the world's largest space-themed fund, amassing $1.3 billion in assets. Its primary draw is its unique position as a "pure" space ETF holding SpaceX stock through a special purpose vehicle (SPV). However, its exposure to SpaceX has been drastically diluted from 10.3% to 4.6% due to a massive, rapid inflow of investor cash. New money is forced into buying other public space stocks like Rocket Lab, meaning investors seeking SpaceX exposure end up with a portfolio of other companies. Further complications arise from the SPV's valuation mechanism, which only updates during specific manager trades, potentially lagging behind SpaceX's market price. This SPV will also face a six-month lock-up post-IPO, preventing investors from selling that portion if SpaceX shares drop after listing. The article highlights a valuation bubble in the broader space sector, with stocks like Planet Labs surging nearly 1000% in a year, driven more by the "SpaceX IPO narrative" than underlying fundamentals. Meanwhile, SpaceX's own financials show significant losses in 2024, and its record-breaking IPO valuation bundles its space business with other Musk assets like xAI, creating a complex investment proposition. The core warning is that the NASA ETF essentially uses SpaceX as bait but delivers a different product. The real beneficiaries may be the ETF issuers collecting high fees, while investors face dilution and hidden risks ahead of SpaceX's historic IPO on June 12th.

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

Raised $1.3 Billion in Seven Weeks, Yet SpaceX's Weighting Halved: The Dilution Trap of the NASA ETF

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

NEAR Doubles: 3 Major Trends Become the 'Engine' for Token Price Surge

NEAR token price surged from around $1.24 in early May to over $2.5, with its market cap returning above $3 billion. This significant growth, occurring amidst broader market volatility, is attributed to three key factors. First, the AI narrative has been a major driver. NEAR co-founder Illia Polosukhin is a co-author of the seminal Transformer paper, the foundation of modern AI models like ChatGPT. NEAR has integrated AI capabilities into its ecosystem, notably through the Near.com super-app, positioning itself as a key decentralized AI infrastructure project. Endorsements from figures like Arthur Hayes further boosted market sentiment. Second, NEAR is enhancing its utility as a privacy-focused blockchain. With the launch of NEAR Intents for cross-chain transactions, privacy features like Confidential Payments and Confidential Intents have become critical to protect users from MEV attacks. These functionalities allow private transfers of assets like ETH and BTC across more than 35 chains, balancing privacy with usability and appealing to institutional and enterprise users. Third, a new tokenomics mechanism is providing buy-side pressure. Following the full unlocking of its initial supply in late 2025, NEAR now employs a fee-burn model. All protocol fees generated by the NEAR Intents layer are used to buy back and effectively remove NEAR tokens from circulation. With NEAR Intents TVL exceeding $80 million, this creates consistent monthly buybacks estimated around $3 million, reducing sell pressure. Additional technical upgrades planned for mid-2026, including dynamic re-sharding and post-quantum security, aim to further strengthen the network's scalability and robustness.

marsbitHace 25 min(s)

NEAR Doubles: 3 Major Trends Become the 'Engine' for Token Price Surge

marsbitHace 25 min(s)

After $HYPE Hits a New High, Is It Worth Considering the Stock of "HYPE Version MicroStrategy" $PURR?

**HYPE Hits New Highs: Is $PURR, the "HYPE Version of MicroStrategy," Worth Considering?** The stock of Hyperliquid Strategies (NASDAQ: $PURR), a publicly-traded company that exclusively buys and holds the cryptocurrency HYPE, has gained over 100% year-to-date, mirroring HYPE's own 150% surge to new all-time highs. This has sparked discussions about PURR being a more "capital-efficient" play than MicroStrategy's bitcoin strategy, given its reported ~$1 billion unrealized gain on a ~$220 million investment. The article clarifies that PURR is essentially a pure-play wrapper for HYPE, with no other business. It resulted from a 2025 SPAC merger led by firms like Paradigm and Atlas Merchant Capital, bringing traditional finance veterans to its board. Its value is entirely derived from the price of HYPE. While PURR offers a crucial compliance bridge for US-based institutional and retirement accounts unable to access HYPE directly, the analysis questions the "capital efficiency" narrative. The outsized gains are attributed to HYPE's exceptional performance, not superior corporate strategy. For investors who can buy HYPE directly, holding PURR introduces unnecessary risks: potential shareholder dilution from future stock offerings, incomplete passthrough of staking rewards, market hour mismatches, and counterparty risk via its single custodian. A key metric is its mNAV (modified net asset value). Current calculations show PURR trades at a discount to its HYPE holdings, but this could flip to a premium depending on the execution of registered share issuances. The article concludes that PURR is primarily a "conduit product." The investment thesis hinges entirely on one's bullishness on HYPE itself, not on the PURR wrapper, which adds friction and risk for those with direct crypto access.

marsbitHace 54 min(s)

After $HYPE Hits a New High, Is It Worth Considering the Stock of "HYPE Version MicroStrategy" $PURR?

marsbitHace 54 min(s)

The Real Progress and Investment Opportunities of Decentralized AI Computing Power Networks in 2026

In 2026, the AI compute market is marked by centralized GPU consolidation and a significant GPU shortage for smaller players. In this context, Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks (DePIN), valued at $9.4B+, have emerged as a viable, revenue-generating alternative. Leading protocols like Aethir ($150M ARR), io.net (130k+ GPUs), Akash, Bittensor, and Render are carving out distinct niches, moving beyond hype to deliver verifiable income primarily from non-crypto-native clients. The key advantage of decentralized GPU networks lies in serving latency-tolerant, cost-sensitive workloads like AI inference, fine-tuning, data preprocessing, and agent operations, offering substantial cost savings (45-80%) compared to major cloud providers. However, reliability variance, lack of robust SLAs, and fragmented tech stacks remain significant adoption hurdles. The sector is maturing with critical 2026 shifts: 1) Evolution of tokenomics towards demand-driven, revenue-linked models (e.g., Render's BME, io.net's IDE), and 2) Clearer enterprise adoption pathways, with traditional firms integrating decentralized compute. For new entrants, opportunities are now concentrated in specialized tooling layers (orchestration, verification, SLA management), vertical applications (e.g., bio-med, content generation), and innovative token designs tied to real usage, rather than generic GPU aggregation. The convergence with the emerging AI Agent economy presents a significant future growth vector.

marsbitHace 55 min(s)

The Real Progress and Investment Opportunities of Decentralized AI Computing Power Networks in 2026

marsbitHace 55 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片