解析加密货币的燃烧和回购机制,是否会提高加密货币的价格?

老雅痞Publicado a 2023-01-30Actualizado a 2023-01-30

Resumen

加密货币市场在很大程度上是由于从传统市场迁移和采用金融策略以满足去中心化资产的需求而增长的。因此,我们有必要了解加密货币回购和销毁。

在项目白皮书里,我们经常会看到Crypto Burn和Crypto Buyback,每次做分析的时候我也会格外关注Burn部分。

在传统的金融市场中,自我投资一直是公司稳定价格的主要工具。加密货币市场在很大程度上是由于从传统市场迁移和采用金融策略以满足去中心化资产的需求而增长的。因此,我们有必要了解加密货币回购和销毁。

加密货币经历了价格动态的动荡,以及与市场上流通的其他代币日益激烈的竞争。这是基于区块链的项目开始应用两种类型的方法来刺激价格和控制发行的原因之一——回购和代币销毁。虽然这两个概念服务于相同的目的,但就价格影响而言,它们的机制和目标有所不同。

什么是加密货币回购和加密货币销毁?

加密货币回购和加密货币销毁的概念是指公司从市场上回购代币,然后销毁它们的做法。这样做是为了减少流通中的代币总数,并对代币的价格产生积极影响。换句话说,这种做法是提高特定代币价值的一种方式。代币持有者可以看到他们的代币价值增加,这意味着这对所有相关方都是有利的。

最早采用这种策略的是币安,它用近20%的利润回购和销毁了币安币(BNB)代币。这导致了BNB代币价格和公司整体价值的上涨。

此后,其他交易所也采用了这一做法。所有这些公司在实施了自己的回购和销毁计划后,都取得了积极的结果。

回购和销毁过程是如何运作的?

区块链网络用于验证交易的几个共识机制之一是Proof-of-burn。这是一种不浪费能源的工作证明协议,允许矿工燃烧虚拟货币的代币。然后,该协议按照烧毁的代币的比例授予采矿权。

然后,矿工将这些代币传输到一个燃烧器地址,并销毁它们。除了在燃烧之前用于挖矿的能量外,这个过程使用的资源较少,使得网络可以保持活跃和灵活。根据该过程的实施方式,你可以烧掉原生货币或BTC等属于替代链的代币。作为交换,你会得到原生货币的回报。

然而,由于资源和竞争较少,vproof-of-burn协议也减少了矿工的数量和代币供应。这可能会给大型矿工带来过多的产能,允许他们一次性销毁大量代币,从而影响价格和供应。

为了解决这个集中化问题,经常会使用衰减率。这有效地降低了单个矿工验证交易的总能力。proof-of-burn类似于权益证明,因为在这两种情况下,矿工都需要锁定他们的资产。然而,在使用权益证明挖矿后,质押者可以拿回他们的代币,这在proof-of-burn中是不可能的。

在加密货币的背景下,回购的方式是一样的。它涉及到从社区购买代币,并把它们放在开发者的钱包里。与燃烧代币不同,它不会永久地消除代币。

加密货币回购和销毁的优势

加密货币市场比传统市场经历了更高的价格波动,至少在当前的市场环境下是这样。加密市场仍处于起步阶段,导致投资者信心下降。因此,发行人需要制定一个清晰、实用、盈利和稳定的价值主张来吸引投资者。

加密货币回购和销毁如何影响加密价格?

一旦可用于二级交易,这些计划就可以支持代币价值的增长和价格稳定。

它们使代币对投资者更具吸引力。

回购和销毁计划会增加流动性,因为二级市场的需求总是更高。这导致代币的价格波动降低。

回购和销毁计划鼓励长期成长型投资者持有代币,使其价格更加稳定。

与回购和销毁相关的风险

加密货币回购和加密货币销毁策略会带来一些风险。一个风险是,进行回购的发行公司会从流通中移除过多的代币。因此,任何依赖于特定代币的加密DApp可能会“耗尽燃料”。

在回购之后,代币的价值也始终存在下跌的风险。如果发生这种情况,投资者持有的价值就会少于以前。这通常发生在团队执行的回购金额低于预期的情况下。

然而,与这种策略所产生的回报相比,上述两种风险都相对较低。

回购和销毁作为加密货币的事实标准

加密货币回购与股票回购或股息回购之间的主要区别在于前者是有保证且自动的。在购买传统股票的情况下,投资者不知道该公司未来是否会支付股息或回购股票。这个决定取决于公司决策者。然而,在回购和销毁的情况下,预定义的编码智能合约会执行这一过程。这意味着发行人别无选择,只能兑现承诺。所有这些都表明,回购和销毁策略将成为未来数字货币的事实标准。

总结

通过回购和销毁策略,企业无法篡改规则。投资者还可以要求提供代币销毁的证据。因此,这一过程消除了投资者方面的不确定性,并为价格稳定和长期价值增长创造了奇迹。

Lecturas Relacionadas

55TB to 28TB? The Rumor and Panic Behind Rubin's Memory Being Halved

Title: 55TB to 28TB? The Rumor and Panic Behind the Potential Halving of Rubin's Memory. On June 4th, a report from SemiAnalysis suggested NVIDIA's next-gen Vera Rubin NVL72 AI rack may ship with roughly 28TB of SOCAMM DRAM per rack instead of the anticipated 55TB, primarily using 96GB modules. This sparked a market panic, causing Micron's stock to drop over 10% on fears of halved memory demand. However, the article argues this panic is misguided for several key reasons. First, SOCAMM modules are socketed and upgradeable, not soldered. Lower initial configuration doesn't mean permanent demand loss. Second, the primary driver is a severe 2026 LPDDR5X supply shortage, not diminished need. NVIDIA is likely prioritizing rack shipments with available components. Third, with fixed total LPDDR5X supply, using less per rack could allow NVIDIA to ship *more* racks, not necessarily reducing overall memory orders. Micron's sharp drop was also attributed to a broader semiconductor sell-off triggered by Broadcom's earnings, with the SemiAnalysis report providing a convenient narrative for profit-taking after Micron's massive rally. In summary: the report on lower default configurations is likely accurate, but interpreting it as a demand collapse is wrong. The real risk for Micron lies in its reportedly minimal HBM4 share for Rubin, not in potentially flexible SOCAMM demand. The sell-off appears more like a correction amplified by coinciding negative catalysts.

marsbitHace 3 min(s)

55TB to 28TB? The Rumor and Panic Behind Rubin's Memory Being Halved

marsbitHace 3 min(s)

Exclusive from Yingke | Tang Wenbin's 'Yuanli Lingji' Merges with Logistics Robotics Company, and Secures Investment from Zhipu, SenseTime, Jieyue, and Others

Exclusive report: Embodied AI company "Yuanli Lingji" recently completed a new round of financing from major AI model firms including Zhipu AI, Stepfun, and SenseTime, alongside continued investments from industrial backers like Huaqin and SAIC Hengxu. Founded in March 2025 by Tang Wenbin, former co-founder and CTO of Megvii, Yuanli Lingji is a general-purpose embodied AI model company. In a notable move, the company has merged with logistics robotics firm "Atomix" (formerly known as Yuanli Juhe) through a share acquisition. Atomix, which originated from Megvii's logistics robotics business led by Tang in 2016 and was spun off in July 2024, has grown to become the world's second-largest supplier of pallet shuttle robots, with annual revenue nearing 1 billion RMB and over 500 projects globally for clients like Uniqlo and CATL. This merger aims to break the industry's "data deadlock" by combining Atomix's extensive real-world operational data from more than 20 countries with Yuanli Lingji's model training capabilities. The company's embodied AI model "DM0" utilizes a cross-domain training approach, integrating internet semantics, autonomous driving rules, and robotics data to achieve hardware-agnostic, precise manipulation even with a compact 2.4B parameter size. The collective investment from key AI players and the strategic merger signal a shift in the competitive landscape, as major model companies pivot from language tokens to physical actions ("from Token to Action"). The industry is entering a consolidation phase where hardware, AI models, data, and application scenarios converge to scale embodied intelligence, a trend mirrored by recent moves from giants like ByteDance and Skild AI.

marsbitHace 10 min(s)

Exclusive from Yingke | Tang Wenbin's 'Yuanli Lingji' Merges with Logistics Robotics Company, and Secures Investment from Zhipu, SenseTime, Jieyue, and Others

marsbitHace 10 min(s)

U.S. Stock Market Trends: Dow Hits New High, Nasdaq Falls, Whom Did Broadcom's Slap Wake Up?

U.S. Stocks Split: Dow Hits Record High as Nasdaq Slips; Broadcom's Plunge Sparks Rotation On June 4, the U.S. stock market saw a sharp divergence. The Dow Jones surged 875 points (+1.73%) to a record high of 51,561.93, while the Nasdaq Composite edged down 0.09%. The S&P 500 rose 0.41%. The primary catalyst was a sharp sell-off in AI-related chip stocks, led by Broadcom (AVGO). Despite reporting a 143% year-over-year jump in AI semiconductor revenue to $10.8 billion, the company's shares plunged about 14%. This was triggered by its maintained long-term AI revenue target, which failed to meet heightened expectations for a stock that had gained 55% this quarter and traded at a high P/E ratio. The slide dragged down the broader semiconductor sector and the technology板块. Conversely, money rotated into sectors like Healthcare (+3.14%), Financials (+2.67%), and Real Estate (+1.87%). UnitedHealth and Goldman Sachs were major contributors to the Dow's gains. The rotation was attributed to a search for value outside overheated tech names and a slight dip in Treasury yields. In other major news, SpaceX confirmed its IPO for June 12, targeting a record $75 billion raise at a ~$1.75 trillion valuation. Additionally, initial jobless claims rose to a four-month high, adding nuance to the labor market narrative ahead of the key May non-farm payrolls report. The day's action signaled that while the AI growth story remains intact, excessive valuations are prompting a market reassessment. Funds are moving, at least temporarily, from high-flying tech to more defensive and value-oriented sectors. The sustainability of this rotation hinges on upcoming economic data, particularly the jobs report, and the market's absorption of the massive SpaceX IPO.

marsbitHace 13 min(s)

U.S. Stock Market Trends: Dow Hits New High, Nasdaq Falls, Whom Did Broadcom's Slap Wake Up?

marsbitHace 13 min(s)

From 'Old Dogs' to 'New Darlings': How AI is Revaluing Old Infrastructure, from Dell to Nokia

"Old Dogs" Become AI's New Darlings: Revaluing Legacy Infrastructure The AI investment narrative is shifting. Beyond the spotlight on core chipmakers like Nvidia, a new wave of interest is rising for legacy tech companies—Dell, HPE, Nokia, Cisco, Corning, Western Digital—once labeled as slow-growth, outdated stories. This resurgence stems from AI's evolution from model development to real-world deployment, creating massive demand for physical infrastructure. As AI moves into data center construction and enterprise adoption, the focus turns to who can actually build and deliver complex systems. These established players hold decades of experience in supply chains, integration, networking, and enterprise delivery—assets now critical for scaling AI. The revaluation can be grouped into three key infrastructure areas: 1. **Servers & Integration (e.g., Dell, HPE):** They are becoming essential system integrators, transforming GPUs into full-scale AI servers with networking, power, and cooling, then delivering them to clients. Strong recent earnings and AI-specific revenue/order growth for Dell and HPE underscore this shift. 2. **Networking & Connectivity (e.g., Corning, Nokia, Cisco):** As AI clusters grow, high-speed data transfer becomes paramount. Corning benefits from fiber demand for data center links, Nokia is exploring AI-integrated wireless networks (AI-RAN), and Cisco sees surging orders for data center switches—all critical for efficient AI operations. 3. **Storage (e.g., Western Digital, Seagate):** The AI data explosion requires vast capacity. Beyond high-speed memory (HBM), there's growing need for high-capacity HDDs to store training data, logs, video, and cold/archival data cost-effectively. This revaluation, however, is not a blanket endorsement. True reassessment requires concrete proof: AI-driven orders and revenue growth, upward revisions to company guidance, and sustainable improvements in profit quality, not just top-line sales. In essence, AI is not turning all old tech firms into high-growth stocks; it is selectively re-pricing the "old assets" of companies that are mission-critical for building the new AI infrastructure, transforming their legacy capabilities into renewed growth engines.

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

From 'Old Dogs' to 'New Darlings': How AI is Revaluing Old Infrastructure, from Dell to Nokia

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片