7*24

Hot topic

Market

Activities

Google Cloud has announced the establishment of a $750 million fund aimed at providing new resources and incentives for its partner ecosystem to help accelerate the transformation of their mutual clients through the use of agent-based artificial intelligence. The fund is open to global consulting firms, system integrators, software partners, and channel partners. (Bloomberg)

[Google Cloud Launches $750 Million Fund to Accelerate AI Development for Partners]Google Cloud has announced the establishment of a $750 million fund aimed at providing new resources and incentives for its partner ecosystem to help accelerate the transformation of their mutual clients through the use of agent-based artificial intelligence. The fund is open to global consulting firms, system integrators, software partners, and channel partners. (Bloomberg)

Google Cloud Launches $750 Million Fund to Accelerate AI Development for Partners

On April 22, The New York Times reported that Robinhood Ventures has invested $75 million in OpenAI.

[Robinhood Ventures Invests $75 Million in OpenAI]On April 22, The New York Times reported that Robinhood Ventures has invested $75 million in OpenAI.

Robinhood Ventures Invests $75 Million in OpenAI

On April 22, the semi-official Tasnim News Agency in Iran reiterated on Wednesday that Gulf Arab states may still face the risk of submarine data cables in the Strait of Hormuz being cut. The agency reported that 'if multiple major cables are damaged simultaneously, whether due to accidents or sabotage, it could lead to severe internet outages in the Persian Gulf.' Several cables cross the Strait of Hormuz. The Gulf region has previously experienced internet disruptions due to multiple cuts to submarine cables in the Red Sea. The Houthi forces in Yemen have also previously threatened regarding the cables.

[Iranian Media Warns of Risks to Submarine Cables in the Strait of Hormuz]On April 22, the semi-official Tasnim News Agency in Iran reiterated on Wednesday that Gulf Arab states may still face the risk of submarine data cables in the Strait of Hormuz being cut. The agency reported that 'if multiple major cables are damaged simultaneously, whether due to accidents or sabotage, it could lead to severe internet outages in the Persian Gulf.' Several cables cross the Strait of Hormuz. The Gulf region has previously experienced internet disruptions due to multiple cuts to submarine cables in the Red Sea. The Houthi forces in Yemen have also previously threatened regarding the cables.

Iranian Media Warns of Risks to Submarine Cables in the Strait of Hormuz

On April 22, Cointelegraph reported that several technical indicators suggest that the price of Bitcoin may be brewing a new round of significant volatility. The current monthly Bollinger Bands have narrowed to their historically tightest range, and analysts believe that once the range expands, it could trigger a 'strong upward market.' Similar situations have historically occurred before the bull markets of 2016 and 2020. Additionally, market observations show that Bitcoin's monthly relative strength index has fallen to its lowest level since the 2022 bear market and has once again touched a long-term support trend line. Such combinations of signals have previously corresponded to cycle bottoms, followed by substantial rebounds. However, in the short term, the upper resistance remains crucial. Analysts point out that BTC needs to effectively break through the $78,000 to $80,000 range to confirm the continuation of the upward trend. Order book data indicates significant selling pressure in this range, and if a successful breakout occurs, the price is expected to further test the $84,000 to $86,000 range.

[Bollinger Band Signal: Bitcoin May Face 'Strong Market', but Must Break $80,000 Resistance]On April 22, Cointelegraph reported that several technical indicators suggest that the price of Bitcoin may be brewing a new round of significant volatility. The current monthly Bollinger Bands have narrowed to their historically tightest range, and analysts believe that once the range expands, it could trigger a 'strong upward market.' Similar situations have historically occurred before the bull markets of 2016 and 2020. Additionally, market observations show that Bitcoin's monthly relative strength index has fallen to its lowest level since the 2022 bear market and has once again touched a long-term support trend line. Such combinations of signals have previously corresponded to cycle bottoms, followed by substantial rebounds. However, in the short term, the upper resistance remains crucial. Analysts point out that BTC needs to effectively break through the $78,000 to $80,000 range to confirm the continuation of the upward trend. Order book data indicates significant selling pressure in this range, and if a successful breakout occurs, the price is expected to further test the $84,000 to $86,000 range.

Bollinger Band Signal: Bitcoin May Face 'Strong Market', but Must Break $80,000 Resistance

According to monitoring by Dongcha Beating, discussions among OpenClaw users about whether 'Anthropic has allowed Claude CLI again' have clarified the facts: Anthropic has never relaxed its policy; the only change is the misunderstanding by OpenClaw founder Peter Steinberger regarding a statement from Boris Cherny, the head of Claude Code. This misunderstanding has been denied twice by the behavior of Anthropic's server-side classifier. Boris's reply on April 6 was posted under Steinberger's experimental tweet. The experiment itself was simple: a request was made using the official Claude CLI with the -p parameter, and by including the phrase 'running inside OpenClaw' in the system prompt, it was classified as a third-party application, resulting in charges from Extra Usage. Boris acknowledged that this was an overreaction by the classifier and promised to improve the usage terms for -p. This statement was aimed at ensuring that 'developers using the official CLI for scripting should not be misclassified,' not that tools like OpenClaw would be exempt from classification. However, Peter directly restored Claude CLI as the default backend for new users in version 2026.4.7, stating in the documentation that 'OpenClaw considers the reuse of claude -p as implicitly permitted,' and he even disabled high-consumption features like heartbeat to demonstrate compliance. This step extended his interpretation of 'CLI use is allowed' to mean 'OpenClaw fundamentally operates as claude -p, so it counts as CLI usage.' Anthropic has never publicly recognized this extension. The server-side classifier continues to reject requests based on OpenClaw's characteristics (currently confirmed mainly by system prompt fingerprints) because the prompt injected by OpenClaw is seen as the strongest signal of 'third-party tools driving the CLI.' While the official CLI is being called, the actual entity initiating the request remains OpenClaw, thus it is still charged as a third party. This is what Steinberger acknowledged today as 'theoretically should be usable, but practically is not.' In other words, he thought the permission he received would cover OpenClaw, but it has proven not to be the case. The so-called 'gray area' is not due to Anthropic's ambiguous stance, but rather a disagreement obscured by vague wording: Boris aimed to fix the boundary of the classifier's misclassification, while Peter interpreted it as 'OpenClaw being within the boundary.'

[Claude CLI Misunderstanding: OpenClaw's Status Remains Unchanged]According to monitoring by Dongcha Beating, discussions among OpenClaw users about whether 'Anthropic has allowed Claude CLI again' have clarified the facts: Anthropic has never relaxed its policy; the only change is the misunderstanding by OpenClaw founder Peter Steinberger regarding a statement from Boris Cherny, the head of Claude Code. This misunderstanding has been denied twice by the behavior of Anthropic's server-side classifier. Boris's reply on April 6 was posted under Steinberger's experimental tweet. The experiment itself was simple: a request was made using the official Claude CLI with the -p parameter, and by including the phrase 'running inside OpenClaw' in the system prompt, it was classified as a third-party application, resulting in charges from Extra Usage. Boris acknowledged that this was an overreaction by the classifier and promised to improve the usage terms for -p. This statement was aimed at ensuring that 'developers using the official CLI for scripting should not be misclassified,' not that tools like OpenClaw would be exempt from classification. However, Peter directly restored Claude CLI as the default backend for new users in version 2026.4.7, stating in the documentation that 'OpenClaw considers the reuse of claude -p as implicitly permitted,' and he even disabled high-consumption features like heartbeat to demonstrate compliance. This step extended his interpretation of 'CLI use is allowed' to mean 'OpenClaw fundamentally operates as claude -p, so it counts as CLI usage.' Anthropic has never publicly recognized this extension. The server-side classifier continues to reject requests based on OpenClaw's characteristics (currently confirmed mainly by system prompt fingerprints) because the prompt injected by OpenClaw is seen as the strongest signal of 'third-party tools driving the CLI.' While the official CLI is being called, the actual entity initiating the request remains OpenClaw, thus it is still charged as a third party. This is what Steinberger acknowledged today as 'theoretically should be usable, but practically is not.' In other words, he thought the permission he received would cover OpenClaw, but it has proven not to be the case. The so-called 'gray area' is not due to Anthropic's ambiguous stance, but rather a disagreement obscured by vague wording: Boris aimed to fix the boundary of the classifier's misclassification, while Peter interpreted it as 'OpenClaw being within the boundary.'

Claude CLI Misunderstanding: OpenClaw's Status Remains Unchanged

On April 22, according to monitoring by Dongcha Beating, The Information cited four informed sources stating that Tencent and Alibaba are in talks to invest in DeepSeek. DeepSeek is owned by the quantitative hedge fund Huanfang Quantitative and has never accepted external funding before. The Information reported last Friday that DeepSeek launched its first round of financing, targeting at least $300 million with a valuation of no less than $10 billion; due to strong interest from potential investors, the valuation target has now risen to over $20 billion. Negotiations are ongoing, and both the valuation and financing amount may change. Sources indicate that the $20 billion pricing is partly based on the new round of $18 billion valuation being finalized for Moonlight. Competitors MiniMax and Zhizhu were both valued at less than $10 billion when they went public in Hong Kong this January, but Zhizhu's market value has now exceeded $50 billion, while MiniMax is over $30 billion. However, DeepSeek has not yet generated meaningful revenue, its model remains open-source, and its chatbot is available for free. Founder Liang Wenfeng has refrained from bringing in external funding for many years, but the shift is driven by multiple pressures: the next-generation flagship model V4 was originally scheduled for release in February but has been postponed multiple times due to engineering challenges; in recent months, core researchers have left for Chinese tech giants; V4 is currently being trained on NVIDIA's Blackwell chips, which have been banned from export to China by the U.S., and the team has spent months adapting the model for Huawei and Cambricon chips. Tencent and Alibaba have previously invested in leading Chinese AI companies such as Zhizhu, MiniMax, and Moonlight.

[Tencent and Alibaba in Talks to Invest Over $20 Billion in DeepSeek]On April 22, according to monitoring by Dongcha Beating, The Information cited four informed sources stating that Tencent and Alibaba are in talks to invest in DeepSeek. DeepSeek is owned by the quantitative hedge fund Huanfang Quantitative and has never accepted external funding before. The Information reported last Friday that DeepSeek launched its first round of financing, targeting at least $300 million with a valuation of no less than $10 billion; due to strong interest from potential investors, the valuation target has now risen to over $20 billion. Negotiations are ongoing, and both the valuation and financing amount may change. Sources indicate that the $20 billion pricing is partly based on the new round of $18 billion valuation being finalized for Moonlight. Competitors MiniMax and Zhizhu were both valued at less than $10 billion when they went public in Hong Kong this January, but Zhizhu's market value has now exceeded $50 billion, while MiniMax is over $30 billion. However, DeepSeek has not yet generated meaningful revenue, its model remains open-source, and its chatbot is available for free. Founder Liang Wenfeng has refrained from bringing in external funding for many years, but the shift is driven by multiple pressures: the next-generation flagship model V4 was originally scheduled for release in February but has been postponed multiple times due to engineering challenges; in recent months, core researchers have left for Chinese tech giants; V4 is currently being trained on NVIDIA's Blackwell chips, which have been banned from export to China by the U.S., and the team has spent months adapting the model for Huawei and Cambricon chips. Tencent and Alibaba have previously invested in leading Chinese AI companies such as Zhizhu, MiniMax, and Moonlight.

Tencent and Alibaba in Talks to Invest Over $20 Billion in DeepSeek

On April 22, according to monitoring by PeckShield, the KelpDAO attacker has begun transferring stolen assets: they moved a portion of the stolen ETH from the Ethereum mainnet to Arbitrum via the Across Protocol, subsequently exchanging it for USDT and routing it to the TRON DAO ecosystem through LayerZero. This path indicates that the attacker is using multi-chain bridges and stablecoin conversion methods for fund dispersion and laundering, and the subsequent flow of funds will require ongoing tracking.

[KelpDAO Attacker Transfers Stolen Funds: Crosses to Arbitrum, Exchanges for USDT, and Flows into Tron Ecosystem]On April 22, according to monitoring by PeckShield, the KelpDAO attacker has begun transferring stolen assets: they moved a portion of the stolen ETH from the Ethereum mainnet to Arbitrum via the Across Protocol, subsequently exchanging it for USDT and routing it to the TRON DAO ecosystem through LayerZero. This path indicates that the attacker is using multi-chain bridges and stablecoin conversion methods for fund dispersion and laundering, and the subsequent flow of funds will require ongoing tracking.

KelpDAO Attacker Transfers Stolen Funds: Crosses to Arbitrum, Exchanges for USDT, and Flows into Tron Ecosystem

On April 22, Iran's semi-official Tasnim News Agency reiterated that Gulf Arab states may still face the risk of submarine data cables in the Strait of Hormuz being cut. The agency reported, "If multiple major cables are damaged simultaneously, whether due to accidents or sabotage, it could lead to severe network disruptions in the Persian Gulf." Several cables traverse the Strait of Hormuz. The Gulf region has previously experienced network outages due to repeated cuts to submarine cables in the Red Sea. The Houthi forces in Yemen had also previously issued threats regarding the cables. (Associated Press)

[Iranian Media Warns of Risks to Submarine Cables in the Strait of Hormuz]On April 22, Iran's semi-official Tasnim News Agency reiterated that Gulf Arab states may still face the risk of submarine data cables in the Strait of Hormuz being cut. The agency reported, "If multiple major cables are damaged simultaneously, whether due to accidents or sabotage, it could lead to severe network disruptions in the Persian Gulf." Several cables traverse the Strait of Hormuz. The Gulf region has previously experienced network outages due to repeated cuts to submarine cables in the Red Sea. The Houthi forces in Yemen had also previously issued threats regarding the cables. (Associated Press)

Lebanese officials revealed to AFP on the 22nd that Lebanon will request a one-month extension of the ceasefire during talks with Israel. (Xinhua International)

[Lebanon to Request One-Month Extension of Ceasefire in Talks with Israel]Lebanese officials revealed to AFP on the 22nd that Lebanon will request a one-month extension of the ceasefire during talks with Israel. (Xinhua International)

Lebanon to Request One-Month Extension of Ceasefire in Talks with Israel

On April 19, on-chain analyst Murphy noted that after Bitcoin (BTC) reached $78,000, the 24-hour average realized profit the following day was $39.15 million, which is lower compared to when BTC hit $76,000 on April 14. The divergence between 'price action' and 'realized profit' typically indicates that the demand side can no longer sustain the concentration of profit-taking, leading to a decline in upward momentum, similar to the situations observed on January 7 and January 14. Additionally, the reduced trading volume over the weekend may also be a contributing factor. If the divergence between 'price' and 'profit' is primarily due to the demand side's inability to sustain further profit-taking, it can be reasonably concluded that the rebound has peaked. However, if the main reason is the decreased market activity over the weekend, further observation will be necessary in the upcoming trading days.

[Analysis: Divergence Between Bitcoin's Price Action and Realized Profit Indicates Possible Peak in Rebound]On April 19, on-chain analyst Murphy noted that after Bitcoin (BTC) reached $78,000, the 24-hour average realized profit the following day was $39.15 million, which is lower compared to when BTC hit $76,000 on April 14. The divergence between 'price action' and 'realized profit' typically indicates that the demand side can no longer sustain the concentration of profit-taking, leading to a decline in upward momentum, similar to the situations observed on January 7 and January 14. Additionally, the reduced trading volume over the weekend may also be a contributing factor. If the divergence between 'price' and 'profit' is primarily due to the demand side's inability to sustain further profit-taking, it can be reasonably concluded that the rebound has peaked. However, if the main reason is the decreased market activity over the weekend, further observation will be necessary in the upcoming trading days.

Analysis: Divergence Between Bitcoin's Price Action and Realized Profit Indicates Possible Peak in Rebound

Bitcoin Created By The CIA? Chinese Professor Jiang Xueqin Makes Bold Claim

BIT Research: Five Signals Flash Simultaneously, Has the Bitcoin Bear Market Ended?

Bitcoin Recovery Fails To Lift Market Sentiment From Extreme Fear

Nic Carter Says Bitcoin Has 3 Ways To Handle Satoshi’s Coins

Crypto And Financial Industry Giants Reveal What X Money Launch Means

Crypto Regulation: Polish Parliament Fails To Overturn Presidential Veto Again

Bitcoin Price Could See Another Crash, But What Is The Long-Term Prognosis?

BTC Market Pulse: Week 17

Shiba Inu Crosses 20,000 Burn Transactions Milestone, Dogecoin Eyes X Money, But Why Are Prices Down?

Strategy Surpasses 800K BTC as $2.5B Bitcoin Buying Spree Continues

Article

TRX fell below 0.33  USDT

Analysis: Divergence Between Bitcoin's Price Action and Realized Profit Indicates Possible Peak in Rebound

Descargo de responsabilidad：El contenido anterior no representa las posiciones de HTX.，HTX no ofrece ninguna recomendación de trading.。

Artículos relacionados

Todos los comentarios0Lo más recientePopular

Temas populares

Artículos relacionados