XRP Ledger Compromised? Validator Warns Projects And Developers Of Critical Issues

bitcoinistPublished on 2025-04-23Last updated on 2025-04-23

Abstract

An XRP Ledger (XRPL) validator has warned projects and developers that the network is compromised. He revealed some critical issues...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

An XRP Ledger (XRPL) validator has warned projects and developers that the network is compromised. He revealed some critical issues on the network, which put users and their funds at risk of an exploit. 

Validator Warns That XRP Ledger is Compromised

In an X post, XRP Ledger validator Vet told the network’s developers and projects that use the XRPL js library not to update or use any version 4.2.1 or higher, as it has been compromised. He remarked that any project utilizing the newest version of XRPL is putting users and funds at risk of an attack from hackers. 

Vet’s warning was in response to a post by Aikido Security, in which they stated that they had discovered a backdoor in the official XRP Ledger NPM package. The blockchain security firm added that this back door steals private keys and sends them to attackers. The affected versions are 4.2.1 and 4.2.4, so developers and projects should not upgrade to these versions. 

Ripple Chief Technology Officer (CTO) David Schwartz also commented on the Ledger situation, noting that it was just the XRPL.js from NPM that was compromised. He also alluded to a post by Ripple senior software engineer Mayukha Vadari. Vadari mentioned that the Ledger itself is unaffected by the malware. 

The engineer confirmed that the malware packages only affected services that use xrpl.js and were upgraded to the malicious versions that were published about a day ago. He added that GitHub remains safe, as only npm has been compromised. Vadari urged users to avoid services that have access to their private keys and seed phrases until they have confirmed that these services are unaffected by this malware. 

XRPL Foundation Provides Update 

The XRP Ledger Foundation also provided an update on the malware situation. In an X post, the Foundation clarified that the vulnerability is in xrpl.js, a JavaScript library for interacting with the XRPL. They further stated that the vulnerability does not affect the network’s codebase or the GitHub repository itself. Meanwhile, the Foundation urged projects using xrpl.js to upgrade to v4.2.5 immediately. 

The XRP Ledger Foundation also confirmed in the thread that it had deprecated the compromised xrpl.js versions on npm. They mentioned that they will share a detailed post-mortem soon and again urged projects and developers to ensure that they are using versions 4.2.5 or 2.14.3. 

In another X post, the Foundation announced that it has published an updated npm package for users of the 2.14.x branch to remove the previously compromised version. They asked these XRP Ledger users to update immediately to version 2.14.3 to prevent an attack. 

XRP
XRP trading at $2.2 on the 1D chart | Source: XRPUSDT on Tradingview.com
Featured image from YouTube, chart from Tradingview.com
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Scott Matherson is a leading crypto writer at Bitcoinist, who possesses a sharp analytical mind and a deep understanding of the digital currency landscape. Scott has earned a reputation for delivering thought-provoking and well-researched articles that resonate with both newcomers and seasoned crypto enthusiasts. Outside of his writing, Scott is passionate about promoting crypto literacy and often works to educate the public on the potential of blockchain.

Related Reads

Gold and Silver Repeatedly Hit New Highs, Why Has Bitcoin Fallen Instead of Rising?

In 2025, precious metals surged dramatically, with silver breaking above $50 and reaching a record high of $72/oz, gaining 143% annually, while gold hit $4,524.30/oz with a 70% yearly increase. In contrast, Bitcoin fell 8% year-to-date to $87,498, down 30% from its October peak of $126,000. This divergence challenges the "digital gold" narrative, as macro tailwinds driving metals—such as a weaker USD, Fed rate cut expectations, and geopolitical risks—did not extend to cryptocurrencies. Investors preferred established safe havens like gold and silver, with central banks and retail buyers increasing physical holdings. Studies confirmed gold's stability during macro shocks, while Bitcoin behaved more as a high-beta risk asset, correlating with equities. Structural demand differences widened the gap: silver benefited from both safe-haven and industrial demand (e.g., solar panels, electronics), whereas Bitcoin lacks real-world utility and relies solely on financial speculation and on-chain settlements. Without industrial demand, Bitcoin depends on ETF inflows, which have recently turned negative. Silver's rally reflects macro pricing of low real rates and a weak dollar, underscoring Bitcoin's exclusion from the hard asset system. For Bitcoin to recover, clearer regulation, renewed institutional interest, or heightened appreciation of its censorship-resistant features may be needed. However, silver's crowded positioning poses indirect risks to Bitcoin if volatility spikes. The 2025 divergence shows Bitcoin has not yet achieved "hard asset" status. While it may outperform under specific conditions, it currently lacks the institutional trust and industrial utility that support precious metals.

marsbitHace 14 min(s)

Gold and Silver Repeatedly Hit New Highs, Why Has Bitcoin Fallen Instead of Rising?

marsbitHace 14 min(s)

2025 Investment Survey: Nearly 60% of Respondents Report Overall Profits, Over 60% Are Seasoned Veterans

2025 Crypto Investment Survey: Over 60% of Participants Report Profits, Majority Are Experienced Traders Despite a relatively quiet Christmas period with BTC oscillating between $85K-$90K and ETH losing momentum, a year-end investment survey by Odaily reveals that 57% of respondents achieved profits in 2025. Among them, 17.2% saw significant gains (over +50%), while 39.7% reported modest profits. About 27% faced losses, contrasting with common pessimistic sentiment. Notably, over 60% of participants have been in crypto for more than three years, indicating a market dominated by experienced "veterans." Meme coins remained the top profit driver (34%), followed by major cryptocurrencies like BTC and ETH (26%), DeFi (16%), and airdrop farming (12%). Conversely, meme coins and altcoins were also the leading cause of losses (28%), alongside contract trading (26%) and setbacks in NFT/GameFi/L2 investments (22%). Key reasons for losses included failure to cut losses promptly, slow reactions, and over-reliance on market rumors. Only 8.6% attributed losses to frequent trading. Looking ahead, respondents are optimistic about RWA (31%), AI (25%), and meme coins (24%) in 2026. Prediction markets also show growth potential, with nearly 60% of users already engaged. Investment advice emphasized dollar-cost averaging, focusing on BTC, and taking profits timely. The article also highlights missed opportunities in 2025, including Trump-themed meme coins, Circle’s IPO, and unexpected airdrops like Plasma (XPL) and ASTER. Despite market volatility, the year offered numerous wealth-building moments, underscoring the dynamic yet challenging nature of crypto investing.

marsbitHace 31 min(s)

2025 Investment Survey: Nearly 60% of Respondents Report Overall Profits, Over 60% Are Seasoned Veterans

marsbitHace 31 min(s)

Stepping into the Stablecoin Wave for Six Years, He Sees the Embryonic Form of the Future of Payments

"Six years into the stablecoin wave, Raj Parekh, former head of crypto at Visa and now leading payments at Monad, reflects on the evolution and future of digital payments. He identifies 2019 and Facebook’s Libra project as a pivotal moment that forced traditional finance to take crypto seriously. At Visa, he led efforts to integrate USDC for near-instant settlement, overcoming slow, costly legacy systems. Parekh later founded Portal Finance to build payment infrastructure, but encountered scalability limitations across blockchains. This led to Portal’s acquisition by Monad, where he now focuses on high-performance, EVM-compatible chains capable of sub-second finality—critical for global payment adoption. He sees stablecoins entering a "email moment" for money: enabling instant, low-cost global value transfer. New business models are emerging where issuers share interest earnings with users, transforming stablecoins into interest-bearing assets even during transactions. This shift, coupled with supportive regulation like the GENIUS Act, is driving broader institutional adoption. Looking ahead, Parekh is excited about AI-powered agentic payments and high-frequency finance, where autonomous agents execute microsecond-speed transactions. He envisions a future where decentralized infrastructure seamlessly integrates into everyday apps, enabling global, efficient, and programmable money movement—ushering in a new era for both finance and user experience."

marsbitHace 31 min(s)

Stepping into the Stablecoin Wave for Six Years, He Sees the Embryonic Form of the Future of Payments

marsbitHace 31 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片