Crypto hack counts fall but supply chain attacks reshape threat landscape

cointelegraphPublicado a 2025-12-23Actualizado a 2025-12-23

Resumen

New data from CertiK reveals that while crypto hackers stole $3.3 billion in 2025, the number of attacks fell sharply. Losses were concentrated in fewer, more damaging supply-chain attacks, which accounted for $1.45 billion across just two incidents, including the $1.4 billion Bybit hack. This shift indicates attackers are moving away from simple code vulnerabilities toward more sophisticated infrastructure-level exploits. The number of security incidents decreased by 162 year-over-year, suggesting improved protocol-level security. The median loss per hack fell 35.75% to $103,966, though the average loss rose to $5.3 million due to high-value outliers. Phishing scams were the second-largest threat, costing $722 million across 248 incidents. A significant subset was "pig butchering" romance scams, which used prolonged emotional manipulation and cost the industry $5.5 billion in 2024.

Crypto hackers stole $3.3 billion in 2025, but the number of attacks fell sharply as losses became concentrated in fewer, more sophisticated supply-chain exploits, according to new data from blockchain security firm CertiK shared with Cointelegraph.

While total losses remained elevated, the decline in incident counts and a drop in median theft sizes suggest that protocol-level security is improving, pushing attackers away from simple code vulnerabilities and toward phishing and infrastructure-level attacks.

CertiK said supply-chain breaches emerged as the most damaging threat, accounting for $1.45 billion in losses across just two incidents, including the $1.4 billion Bybit hack in February.

"The Bybit exploit signals that well-capitalized, well-coordinated threat actors are becoming more active across the ecosystem," the report said, predicting a rise in the “sophistication” of supply chain attacks as attackers target more infrastructure providers.

Crypto hacks by amount and incident, yearly chart. Source: CertiK

Related: Soulja Boy token sparks backlash after Base co-founder posts purchase receipt

The number of security incidents decreased by 162 counts year-over-year, indicating that blockchain cybersecurity measures are improving despite hackers aiming for larger targets.

The average amount lost per hack stood at $5.3 million, a 66% increase from the previous year. However, the median loss — a measure less influenced by outlier incidents — fell to $103,966, down 35.75% over the same period.

Cryptop hacks by incident type and amount of losses, one-year chart. Source: CertiK

Related: Solana AI token Ava hit by launch sniping tied to deployer: Bubblemaps

Code vulnerabilities fade as “pig butchering” scams threaten crypto savings

Phishing scams became the second-largest threat, costing crypto investors a cumulative $722 million across 248 incidents.

Recently, an investor lost their entire Bitcoin (BTC) retirement fund in an artificial intelligence-fueled romance scam, also known as a "pig butchering" scam, where the con artists used prolonged emotional manipulation to convince the investors to transfer their funds.

Pig butchering victim stats, grooming time. Source: Cyvers

Pig butchering scams are a subset of phishing scams that cost the industry a collective $5.5 billion in 2024, across 200,000 individual cases.

Notably, the average grooming period for victims is between one and two weeks in 35% of cases, while 10% of scams involve grooming periods of up to three months, according to blockchain security platform Cyvers.

In June, the US Department of Justice announced the seizure of over $225 million in crypto linked to pig butchering scams.

Magazine: Coinbase hack shows the law probably won’t protect you — Here’s why

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to CertiK's data, what was the total amount stolen by crypto hackers in 2025 and what was the most damaging type of attack?

ACrypto hackers stole a total of $3.3 billion in 2025. The most damaging type of attack was supply-chain breaches, which accounted for $1.45 billion in losses.

QWhat does the report suggest about the trend in protocol-level security based on the decline in incident counts and median theft sizes?

AThe decline in incident counts and the drop in median theft sizes suggest that protocol-level security is improving. This is pushing attackers away from simple code vulnerabilities and toward more sophisticated methods like phishing and infrastructure-level attacks.

QWhat was the average amount lost per hack and how much did it change from the previous year?

AThe average amount lost per hack stood at $5.3 million, which was a 66% increase from the previous year.

QWhat are 'pig butchering' scams and how much did they cost the industry in 2024?

A'Pig butchering' scams are a subset of phishing scams that involve prolonged emotional manipulation to convince victims to transfer their funds. They cost the industry a collective $5.5 billion in 2024 across 200,000 individual cases.

QWhat significant action did the US Department of Justice take regarding pig butchering scams in June?

AIn June, the US Department of Justice announced the seizure of over $225 million in cryptocurrency that was linked to pig butchering scams.

Lecturas Relacionadas

La Distribución del Valor de las Stablecoins

El autor analiza la distribución de valor en el ecosistema de las stablecoins, dividiéndolo en cuatro capas: 1. **Capa de emisión:** Emite las stablecoins y gana el diferencial de intereses (ej. Tether, Circle). 2. **Capa de infraestructura:** Conecta las stablecoins con el sistema financiero tradicional (ej. Bridge, BVNK, Bitso). 3. **Capa de adquisición/distribución:** Integra las stablecoins en sistemas de pago empresariales (ej. Stripe, Infini, Coinbase). 4. **Capa de aplicación:** Usuarios y empresas finales. La capa de emisión actualmente captura la mayor parte del valor. La capa de infraestructura, aunque crucial, realiza el trabajo pesado de integrar sistemas, gestionar la normativa y conectar con bancos, lo que supone una gran barrera de entrada pero también una ventaja competitiva a largo plazo. El autor argumenta que el verdadero desafío no es la transferencia en cadena, sino el "espacio intermedio" entre la cadena de bloques y el mundo real, que incluye problemas de conversión fiduciaria, cumplimiento normativo, contabilidad y adopción por parte de las empresas. Empresas como Stripe y Mastercard están adquiriendo plataformas de infraestructura (Bridge, BVNK) para controlar este acceso clave. La capa de infraestructura se encuentra en una fase de inversión inicial, luchando por establecer relaciones, red y hábitos de uso. Aunque actualmente tiene menos poder de negociación, el autor sugiere que, una vez que las stablecoins se conviertan en un canal de pago predeterminado para las empresas, esta capa podría posicionarse de manera muy sólida al ser la que resuelve los complejos problemas de integración con el sistema financiero tradicional.

链捕手Hace 52 min(s)

La Distribución del Valor de las Stablecoins

链捕手Hace 52 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片