7*24

Hot topic

Market

Activities

On March 29th, Elon Musk stated that Tesla's "Full Self-Driving" (FSD) assistance system does more than just brake after an event; it can predict pedestrian intent before they step into the road. Tesla's AI-powered autonomous driving will be over 10 times safer than human driving. Additionally, Tesla's massive semiconductor chip factory project in the United States, Terafab, has commenced construction. The Terafab chip factory is exceptionally large, integrating the production of logic AI chips, memory, and advanced packaging all within a single facility. Its core objective is to produce 100 to 200 billion chips annually, with an initial capacity of 100,000 wafers per month, eventually scalable to 1 million wafers per month, far exceeding current mainstream factories like TSMC and Intel. Musk's original intention was to address Tesla's explosive demand for AI computing power, providing self-produced chips for the Dojo supercomputer, FSD, Optimus robots, and Robotaxi fleets, thereby avoiding reliance on external suppliers such as TSMC and Samsung.

[Musk: Tesla FSD to Predict Pedestrian Intent, AI Driving Over 10x Safer Than Humans]On March 29th, Elon Musk stated that Tesla's "Full Self-Driving" (FSD) assistance system does more than just brake after an event; it can predict pedestrian intent before they step into the road. Tesla's AI-powered autonomous driving will be over 10 times safer than human driving. Additionally, Tesla's massive semiconductor chip factory project in the United States, Terafab, has commenced construction. The Terafab chip factory is exceptionally large, integrating the production of logic AI chips, memory, and advanced packaging all within a single facility. Its core objective is to produce 100 to 200 billion chips annually, with an initial capacity of 100,000 wafers per month, eventually scalable to 1 million wafers per month, far exceeding current mainstream factories like TSMC and Intel. Musk's original intention was to address Tesla's explosive demand for AI computing power, providing self-produced chips for the Dojo supercomputer, FSD, Optimus robots, and Robotaxi fleets, thereby avoiding reliance on external suppliers such as TSMC and Samsung.

Musk: Tesla FSD to Predict Pedestrian Intent, AI Driving Over 10x Safer Than Humans

According to Iranian media reports today (March 29), Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf stated that the United States is publicly discussing negotiations while secretly planning a ground offensive. Ghalibaf claimed that the Iranian armed forces are "awaiting" a US ground attack and will "punish" its regional allies. (CCTV International News)

[Iran Accuses US of Plotting Ground War Amidst Talks]According to Iranian media reports today (March 29), Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf stated that the United States is publicly discussing negotiations while secretly planning a ground offensive. Ghalibaf claimed that the Iranian armed forces are "awaiting" a US ground attack and will "punish" its regional allies. (CCTV International News)

Iran Accuses US of Plotting Ground War Amidst Talks

On March 29th, The Kobeissi Letter released a market analysis indicating that US tech stocks have entered a relatively undervalued territory. The forward Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio for the S&P 500 Information Technology Index is currently only 4% higher than that of the S&P 500. This marks the lowest level since January 2019, with the premium having fallen by 32 percentage points since October 2025, representing one of the largest discounts on record. In simple terms, US tech stocks are currently at their cheapest level relative to the broader market in seven years. For comparison, during the peak overvaluation of tech stocks in June 2024, the tech sector was approximately 47% more expensive than the S&P 500. Tech stocks are now trending towards being less overvalued than the S&P 500 for the first time since 2017. Kobeissi Letter suggests it might be time to buy tech stocks. BlockBeats Note: Based on current market data, the forward P/E ratio for the S&P 500 Information Technology Index is still around the low 20s, while the forward P/E for the overall S&P 500 is around 20-21 times, placing it in a relatively low valuation range in recent years. Historically, significant pullbacks in the relative valuation of tech stocks have often been followed by divergent performance. However, whether it is 'worth buying' still requires comprehensive judgment based on factors such as the macroeconomic environment, corporate earnings growth, and interest rate trends.

[Analysis: US Tech Stocks at 7-Year Low Valuation Relative to Market]On March 29th, The Kobeissi Letter released a market analysis indicating that US tech stocks have entered a relatively undervalued territory. The forward Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio for the S&P 500 Information Technology Index is currently only 4% higher than that of the S&P 500. This marks the lowest level since January 2019, with the premium having fallen by 32 percentage points since October 2025, representing one of the largest discounts on record. In simple terms, US tech stocks are currently at their cheapest level relative to the broader market in seven years. For comparison, during the peak overvaluation of tech stocks in June 2024, the tech sector was approximately 47% more expensive than the S&P 500. Tech stocks are now trending towards being less overvalued than the S&P 500 for the first time since 2017. Kobeissi Letter suggests it might be time to buy tech stocks. BlockBeats Note: Based on current market data, the forward P/E ratio for the S&P 500 Information Technology Index is still around the low 20s, while the forward P/E for the overall S&P 500 is around 20-21 times, placing it in a relatively low valuation range in recent years. Historically, significant pullbacks in the relative valuation of tech stocks have often been followed by divergent performance. However, whether it is 'worth buying' still requires comprehensive judgment based on factors such as the macroeconomic environment, corporate earnings growth, and interest rate trends.

Analysis: US Tech Stocks at 7-Year Low Valuation Relative to Market

On March 29, CoinList announced it will support football media platform OneFootball's OFC token TGE (Token Generation Event) on April 9. The tokens will be distributed to the non-custodial CoinList wallets of sale participants. In addition to the TGE of its native token OFC, OneFootball also stated that it will launch FanPass, multiple new products, and a brand new roadmap.

[CoinList to Support OneFootball's OFC Token TGE on April 9]On March 29, CoinList announced it will support football media platform OneFootball's OFC token TGE (Token Generation Event) on April 9. The tokens will be distributed to the non-custodial CoinList wallets of sale participants. In addition to the TGE of its native token OFC, OneFootball also stated that it will launch FanPass, multiple new products, and a brand new roadmap.

CoinList to Support OneFootball's OFC Token TGE on April 9

According to 1M AI News monitoring, at the Global Unicorn Enterprises Conference, 360 founder Zhou Hongyi interpreted the recent popular 'lobster heat' (OpenClaw). Regarding when Tokens (tokens) can become more inclusive and accessible to ordinary people, like mobile data, Zhou Hongyi stated: The core of the traditional internet is traffic, its infrastructure (such as fiber optics) has near-infinite capacity, and user traffic usage is directly proportional to duration and volume. The more users a platform has, the lower the marginal cost. However, AI is completely different. The essence of AI operation is computing power consumption, information processing, and 'intellectual cost', following the logic of information and energy conservation: the more complex the task and the deeper the demand, the higher the consumption of computing power and resources. It is impossible to complete highly complex work with extremely low investment. Tokens are the unit of measurement for the intellectual and computing power consumed by artificial intelligence, with a relatively fixed unit price, and higher usage leads to higher costs. Therefore, Tokens will never achieve unlimited monthly usage like mobile data.

[Zhou Hongyi: Tokens Will Never Offer Unlimited Monthly Plans Like Mobile Data]According to 1M AI News monitoring, at the Global Unicorn Enterprises Conference, 360 founder Zhou Hongyi interpreted the recent popular 'lobster heat' (OpenClaw). Regarding when Tokens (tokens) can become more inclusive and accessible to ordinary people, like mobile data, Zhou Hongyi stated: The core of the traditional internet is traffic, its infrastructure (such as fiber optics) has near-infinite capacity, and user traffic usage is directly proportional to duration and volume. The more users a platform has, the lower the marginal cost. However, AI is completely different. The essence of AI operation is computing power consumption, information processing, and 'intellectual cost', following the logic of information and energy conservation: the more complex the task and the deeper the demand, the higher the consumption of computing power and resources. It is impossible to complete highly complex work with extremely low investment. Tokens are the unit of measurement for the intellectual and computing power consumed by artificial intelligence, with a relatively fixed unit price, and higher usage leads to higher costs. Therefore, Tokens will never achieve unlimited monthly usage like mobile data.

Zhou Hongyi: Tokens Will Never Offer Unlimited Monthly Plans Like Mobile Data

On March 29th, crypto trading indicator analysis platform CoinKarma stated that following Bitcoin's pullback from $76,000, liquidity and altcoin resilience indicators are showing significant resonance again, indicating that conditions are favorable for a short-term rebound. Within the current trading range, when overall market liquidity (10% Overall Liquidity) and the altcoin resilience index (ALT resilient Index) exhibit strong resonance, there is a high probability of forming a short-term bottom, with potential for a rebound.

[CoinKarma: Market Conditions Ripe for Short-Term Rebound]On March 29th, crypto trading indicator analysis platform CoinKarma stated that following Bitcoin's pullback from $76,000, liquidity and altcoin resilience indicators are showing significant resonance again, indicating that conditions are favorable for a short-term rebound. Within the current trading range, when overall market liquidity (10% Overall Liquidity) and the altcoin resilience index (ALT resilient Index) exhibit strong resonance, there is a high probability of forming a short-term bottom, with potential for a rebound.

CoinKarma: Market Conditions Ripe for Short-Term Rebound

On March 29th, cryptocurrency trading indicator analysis platform CoinKarma stated that following Bitcoin's pullback from $76,000, liquidity and altcoin resilience indicators have once again shown significant resonance. This suggests that short-term conditions are favorable for a bottoming out and a subsequent rebound. Within the current trading range, when market-wide liquidity (10% Overall Liquidity) and the Altcoin Resilience Index (ALT resilient Index) exhibit strong resonance, there is a high probability of forming a short-term bottom, with potential for a rebound.

[CoinKarma: Liquidity and Altcoin Resilience Indicators Show Strong Resonance, Suggesting Short-Term Bottoming and Rebound Potential]On March 29th, cryptocurrency trading indicator analysis platform CoinKarma stated that following Bitcoin's pullback from $76,000, liquidity and altcoin resilience indicators have once again shown significant resonance. This suggests that short-term conditions are favorable for a bottoming out and a subsequent rebound. Within the current trading range, when market-wide liquidity (10% Overall Liquidity) and the Altcoin Resilience Index (ALT resilient Index) exhibit strong resonance, there is a high probability of forming a short-term bottom, with potential for a rebound.

CoinKarma: Liquidity and Altcoin Resilience Indicators Show Strong Resonance, Suggesting Short-Term Bottoming and Rebound Potential

On March 29th, news of the US military preparing for ground operations in Iran sent shockwaves globally. Unlike the full-scale invasion of the 2003 Iraq War, the Pentagon is now deploying a "scalpel decapitation" tactic – no territorial occupation, no prolonged warfare, directly targeting Iran's oil lifeline, Kharg Island, in an attempt to replicate the glory of the 1991 Gulf War with a "victory in weeks." The Washington Post reported on the 28th that the Pentagon is preparing for a limited ground operation lasting several weeks, rather than a full occupation-style invasion. Thousands of Marines and paratroopers from the 82nd Airborne Division have already deployed to the Middle East. Among them, approximately 3,500 personnel from the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit are aboard the amphibious assault ship USS Tripoli, heading directly to the core waters of the Persian Gulf. The Wall Street Journal disclosed on the 26th that the US military is considering deploying up to an additional 10,000 ground combat troops, including infantry and armored forces. This total troop size would be only one percent of that deployed in the Iraq War, completely abandoning the operational model of a million-strong army pressing in. The Pentagon's strategic intent is very clear: abandon costly and uncontrollable full occupation, and instead focus on an "economic strangulation war." Its core tactical objective directly targets Iran's southwestern oil-producing regions and the strategic chokepoint of the Strait of Hormuz, and further locks onto Kharg Island, the core hub of Iran's crude oil exports. This island bears over 90% of Iran's crude oil export tasks, making it the lifeline of Iran's economy. Multiple international media outlets and think tanks have repeatedly warned: clinging to the "42-day victory over Iran" myth may lead the United States into a new strategic quagmire. (Guo Shi Zhi Tong Che)

[US Military's "Weeks-Long" Iran Ground Operation Plan Revealed, Aims to Replicate "42-Day Victory" Myth]On March 29th, news of the US military preparing for ground operations in Iran sent shockwaves globally. Unlike the full-scale invasion of the 2003 Iraq War, the Pentagon is now deploying a "scalpel decapitation" tactic – no territorial occupation, no prolonged warfare, directly targeting Iran's oil lifeline, Kharg Island, in an attempt to replicate the glory of the 1991 Gulf War with a "victory in weeks." The Washington Post reported on the 28th that the Pentagon is preparing for a limited ground operation lasting several weeks, rather than a full occupation-style invasion. Thousands of Marines and paratroopers from the 82nd Airborne Division have already deployed to the Middle East. Among them, approximately 3,500 personnel from the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit are aboard the amphibious assault ship USS Tripoli, heading directly to the core waters of the Persian Gulf. The Wall Street Journal disclosed on the 26th that the US military is considering deploying up to an additional 10,000 ground combat troops, including infantry and armored forces. This total troop size would be only one percent of that deployed in the Iraq War, completely abandoning the operational model of a million-strong army pressing in. The Pentagon's strategic intent is very clear: abandon costly and uncontrollable full occupation, and instead focus on an "economic strangulation war." Its core tactical objective directly targets Iran's southwestern oil-producing regions and the strategic chokepoint of the Strait of Hormuz, and further locks onto Kharg Island, the core hub of Iran's crude oil exports. This island bears over 90% of Iran's crude oil export tasks, making it the lifeline of Iran's economy. Multiple international media outlets and think tanks have repeatedly warned: clinging to the "42-day victory over Iran" myth may lead the United States into a new strategic quagmire. (Guo Shi Zhi Tong Che)

US Military's "Weeks-Long" Iran Ground Operation Plan Revealed, Aims to Replicate "42-Day Victory" Myth

On March 29th, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) issued a statement today, announcing that the Israeli Air Force conducted a large-scale airstrike on infrastructure in Tehran's core area on the 28th. During this operation, the IDF further weakened Iran's weapons production infrastructure, targeting dozens of weapons storage and production sites. As Iran has begun transferring its command centers to mobile units, the IDF destroyed several temporary Iranian command centers in this strike, including commanders operating within these headquarters. The IDF stated that this operation further weakened Iran's core system and combat capabilities. (Jins ten)

[IDF Claims Strikes on Iranian Temporary Command Centers]On March 29th, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) issued a statement today, announcing that the Israeli Air Force conducted a large-scale airstrike on infrastructure in Tehran's core area on the 28th. During this operation, the IDF further weakened Iran's weapons production infrastructure, targeting dozens of weapons storage and production sites. As Iran has begun transferring its command centers to mobile units, the IDF destroyed several temporary Iranian command centers in this strike, including commanders operating within these headquarters. The IDF stated that this operation further weakened Iran's core system and combat capabilities. (Jins ten)

IDF Claims Strikes on Iranian Temporary Command Centers

According to Decrypt, Vitalik Buterin, the Ethereum co-founder, said the colossal collapse of FTX was inevitable because of its centralized nature. “This year we’ve seen a huge number of things that break because they have a model which is fundamentally bad,” Buterin said when asked about the collapse of FTX and other cryptocurrency companies this year. Buterin noted that people were more interested in the marketing of FTX and the “personalistic style” similar to that of “1930s dictators” which is the “exact opposite of every ethos of crypto is a project that tries to be decentralized.”

Detail

【Vitalik Buterin: The colossal collapse of FTX was inevitable because of its centralized nature】According to Decrypt, Vitalik Buterin, the Ethereum co-founder, said the colossal collapse of FTX was inevitable because of its centralized nature. “This year we’ve seen a huge number of things that break because they have a model which is fundamentally bad,” Buterin said when asked about the collapse of FTX and other cryptocurrency companies this year. Buterin noted that people were more interested in the marketing of FTX and the “personalistic style” similar to that of “1930s dictators” which is the “exact opposite of every ethos of crypto is a project that tries to be decentralized.”

Vitalik Buterin: The colossal collapse of FTX was inevitable because of its centralized nature

Article

Bitcoin May Fall Below $60,000: Recovery to All-Time Highs Potentially Delayed to 2027 Amidst Whale Sell-offs

Polymarket Partners with Parti com to Launch Live Prediction Market Platform

Iran Claims Destruction of Two US Military Tankers

Iran Claims Destruction of Two US Military Tanker Aircraft

BTC fell below 67000  USDT

Vitalik Buterin: The colossal collapse of FTX was inevitable because of its centralized nature

Descargo de responsabilidad：El contenido anterior no representa las posiciones de HTX.，HTX no ofrece ninguna recomendación de trading.。

Artículos relacionados

Todos los comentarios0Lo más recientePopular

Temas populares

Artículos relacionados