7*24

Hot topic

Market

Activities

On May 30, the Associated Press reported that the US military has once again struck a commercial vessel attempting to break through a blockade to reach an Iranian port, causing it to lose power. (Xinhua News Agency)

[US Military Strikes Commercial Ship Attempting to Break Blockade to Iranian Port]On May 30, the Associated Press reported that the US military has once again struck a commercial vessel attempting to break through a blockade to reach an Iranian port, causing it to lose power. (Xinhua News Agency)

US Military Strikes Commercial Ship Attempting to Break Blockade to Iranian Port

sfp Surges 11.78% in 24H, Currently at 0.3008 USDT

【sfp currently trades at 0.3008 USDT, up 11.78% in 24h, according to HTX market data.】sfp Surges 11.78% in 24H, Currently at 0.3008 USDT

sfp currently trades at 0.3008 USDT, up 11.78% in 24h, according to HTX market data.

On May 30, the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued an updated statement explicitly prohibiting U.S. individuals from entering into any 'safe passage' agreements with the Iranian government or the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, even if no fees are involved. Iran's newly established 'Persian Gulf Strait Management Bureau' aims to charge 'toll fees' for vessels passing through the Strait of Hormuz and provide security guarantees. The U.S. has designated this bureau for sanctions, warning that any dealings with it face the risk of sanctions. The Treasury Department's statement emphasized that requesting 'safe passage guarantee' services from Iran is prohibited, regardless of payment. The U.S. continues to maintain a hardline stance on sanctions against Iran, rejecting any form of 'paid protection' or similar transactions. According to monitoring by PolyBeats, the probability of 'navigation through the Strait of Hormuz' occurring before June 15 is 8%, and the probability before the end of June is 34%.

[U.S. Government Prohibits Agreements for 'Safe Passage' with Iran; Navigation in Hormuz Remains Challenging]On May 30, the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued an updated statement explicitly prohibiting U.S. individuals from entering into any 'safe passage' agreements with the Iranian government or the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, even if no fees are involved. Iran's newly established 'Persian Gulf Strait Management Bureau' aims to charge 'toll fees' for vessels passing through the Strait of Hormuz and provide security guarantees. The U.S. has designated this bureau for sanctions, warning that any dealings with it face the risk of sanctions. The Treasury Department's statement emphasized that requesting 'safe passage guarantee' services from Iran is prohibited, regardless of payment. The U.S. continues to maintain a hardline stance on sanctions against Iran, rejecting any form of 'paid protection' or similar transactions. According to monitoring by PolyBeats, the probability of 'navigation through the Strait of Hormuz' occurring before June 15 is 8%, and the probability before the end of June is 34%.

U.S. Government Prohibits Agreements for 'Safe Passage' with Iran; Navigation in Hormuz Remains Challenging

U.S. Defense Secretary Hegseth stated that the Strait of Hormuz will be fully open and free for all nations' vessels to pass through, which is the appropriate status for the strait.

[U.S. Defense Secretary Hegseth: Strait of Hormuz Will Be Fully Open and Free]U.S. Defense Secretary Hegseth stated that the Strait of Hormuz will be fully open and free for all nations' vessels to pass through, which is the appropriate status for the strait.

U.S. Defense Secretary Hegseth: Strait of Hormuz Will Be Fully Open and Free

On May 30, developer donnoh disclosed that due to a vulnerability during a recent upgrade, the status updates of the Base network have been stalled for over 30 hours. However, since withdrawals from Base to the Ethereum mainnet require approximately a 7-day challenge period, most ordinary users have not yet noticeably perceived this anomaly. Subsequently, the official Base status page issued an announcement confirming that the issue originated from a fault related to the TEE (Trusted Execution Environment) enclave, which interrupted the network proposal process and subsequently affected the status update process. The official statement indicated that the withdrawal function of the Base mainnet is currently delayed, and the team is working on a fix. Other core network components have not been directly affected, aside from the withdrawal process.

[Delay in Base Mainnet Withdrawal Function, Team Working on Fix]On May 30, developer donnoh disclosed that due to a vulnerability during a recent upgrade, the status updates of the Base network have been stalled for over 30 hours. However, since withdrawals from Base to the Ethereum mainnet require approximately a 7-day challenge period, most ordinary users have not yet noticeably perceived this anomaly. Subsequently, the official Base status page issued an announcement confirming that the issue originated from a fault related to the TEE (Trusted Execution Environment) enclave, which interrupted the network proposal process and subsequently affected the status update process. The official statement indicated that the withdrawal function of the Base mainnet is currently delayed, and the team is working on a fix. Other core network components have not been directly affected, aside from the withdrawal process.

Delay in Base Mainnet Withdrawal Function, Team Working on Fix

DxSale.Network issued a statement on platform X addressing a recent security incident, indicating that the vulnerability stemmed from the newly launched atomic swap feature on BSC, which affected the v1 locking contract that was launched in 2021. The source of the issue has been identified, and the locking contracts for v2 and above are secure and have passed Certik audits. Assets locked in v2 and above are not affected. Previously, DxSale was accused of exploiting a backdoor to drain over 1,400 liquidity pools, resulting in approximately $7.3 million in liquidity funds being withdrawn.

[DxSale Responds to Security Incident: BSC Atomic Swap Vulnerability Affects v1 Locking, v2 and Above Versions Secure]DxSale.Network issued a statement on platform X addressing a recent security incident, indicating that the vulnerability stemmed from the newly launched atomic swap feature on BSC, which affected the v1 locking contract that was launched in 2021. The source of the issue has been identified, and the locking contracts for v2 and above are secure and have passed Certik audits. Assets locked in v2 and above are not affected. Previously, DxSale was accused of exploiting a backdoor to drain over 1,400 liquidity pools, resulting in approximately $7.3 million in liquidity funds being withdrawn.

DxSale Responds to Security Incident: BSC Atomic Swap Vulnerability Affects v1 Locking, v2 and Above Versions Secure

On May 30, according to HTX market information, Bitcoin has surpassed $74,000, with a 24-hour increase of 1.3%.

[Bitcoin Surpasses $74,000, 24-Hour Increase of 1.3%]On May 30, according to HTX market information, Bitcoin has surpassed $74,000, with a 24-hour increase of 1.3%.

Bitcoin Surpasses $74,000, 24-Hour Increase of 1.3%

a16z crypto published an analysis on the unique value and challenges faced by prediction markets. It pointed out that prediction markets allow participants to trade on the outcomes of events, aggregating dispersed information through price signals to provide real-time estimates of future event probabilities. Unlike traditional polls, prediction markets have the capability to update in real-time and incentivize participants to stake their capital on their information, thereby improving prediction accuracy. Their core advantage lies in providing independent probability estimates for specific events rather than relying on indirect signals from overall asset price movements. However, they still face challenges related to infrastructure and market design, including event verification, contract settlement, participant information adequacy, and potential manipulation risks. If these issues are addressed, prediction markets are expected to become important tools for decision-making and information aggregation, enhancing financial and societal insights into future events.

[a16z Crypto: Key Challenges in Prediction Markets Including Event Verification and Market Manipulation]a16z crypto published an analysis on the unique value and challenges faced by prediction markets. It pointed out that prediction markets allow participants to trade on the outcomes of events, aggregating dispersed information through price signals to provide real-time estimates of future event probabilities. Unlike traditional polls, prediction markets have the capability to update in real-time and incentivize participants to stake their capital on their information, thereby improving prediction accuracy. Their core advantage lies in providing independent probability estimates for specific events rather than relying on indirect signals from overall asset price movements. However, they still face challenges related to infrastructure and market design, including event verification, contract settlement, participant information adequacy, and potential manipulation risks. If these issues are addressed, prediction markets are expected to become important tools for decision-making and information aggregation, enhancing financial and societal insights into future events.

a16z Crypto: Key Challenges in Prediction Markets Including Event Verification and Market Manipulation

On May 30, Dan Loeb, founder of Third Point and manager of a $24 billion hedge fund, expressed strong optimism about AI, stating that the current AI boom is fundamentally different from the internet bubble era. Loeb pointed out that major tech companies have announced a total investment of over $700 billion in AI infrastructure this year, with projections exceeding $1 trillion next year. These companies are highly profitable and generating substantial cash flow, allowing most of their expenditures to be supported by their own funds. 'If you don't believe these capital expenditures will yield returns, it's like saying they are flushing money down the toilet, which is very different from the internet bubble—during that time, we shorted the bubble and achieved good returns over those years.' Loeb emphasized that he does not see a valuation bubble at present. He cited Anthropic as an example to support his optimistic view: its latest financing valuation has reached $965 billion, up from $380 billion in February, with annual revenue soaring from $14 billion to $47 billion in the same period. The adoption rate and practicality of its products are rapidly increasing, and the upcoming new model is highly anticipated. 'You can convincingly argue that we are just scratching the surface of the AI boom, and the application layer on the enterprise side is just getting started, so I stand with the optimists.' As of the end of March, Loeb's Third Point included significant holdings in Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, and Nvidia.

[Loeb Refutes Bubble Theory: Investing in AI is Not a Waste, We Are Just Scratching the Surface of the Boom]On May 30, Dan Loeb, founder of Third Point and manager of a $24 billion hedge fund, expressed strong optimism about AI, stating that the current AI boom is fundamentally different from the internet bubble era. Loeb pointed out that major tech companies have announced a total investment of over $700 billion in AI infrastructure this year, with projections exceeding $1 trillion next year. These companies are highly profitable and generating substantial cash flow, allowing most of their expenditures to be supported by their own funds. 'If you don't believe these capital expenditures will yield returns, it's like saying they are flushing money down the toilet, which is very different from the internet bubble—during that time, we shorted the bubble and achieved good returns over those years.' Loeb emphasized that he does not see a valuation bubble at present. He cited Anthropic as an example to support his optimistic view: its latest financing valuation has reached $965 billion, up from $380 billion in February, with annual revenue soaring from $14 billion to $47 billion in the same period. The adoption rate and practicality of its products are rapidly increasing, and the upcoming new model is highly anticipated. 'You can convincingly argue that we are just scratching the surface of the AI boom, and the application layer on the enterprise side is just getting started, so I stand with the optimists.' As of the end of March, Loeb's Third Point included significant holdings in Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, and Nvidia.

Loeb Refutes Bubble Theory: Investing in AI is Not a Waste, We Are Just Scratching the Surface of the Boom

According to The Block, the Celo network-based decentralized finance lending protocol Moola Market paused operations following an $8.4 million exploit. According to an analysis by The Block Research's Igor Igamberdiev, the exploiter used 243,000 CELO tokens and in turn loaned 60,000 CELO to Moola to borrow 1.8 million MOO for use as collateral. With the remaining CELO, the exploiter pumped the price of MOO and proceeded to use the borrowed MOO as collateral to borrow tokens across a series of other DeFi lending protocols. For the efforts, the attacker netted 8.8 million CELO ($6.5 million), 765,000 cEUR ($700,000), 1.8 million MOO ($600,000), and 644,000 cUSD ($600,000). Moola Market said its team is actively investigating the incident and that all activity on the platform has been paused. In the meantime, users are advised by Moola not to trade mTokens.

Detail

【DeFi lending protocol Moola Market hit by $8.4 million exploit】According to The Block, the Celo network-based decentralized finance lending protocol Moola Market paused operations following an $8.4 million exploit. According to an analysis by The Block Research's Igor Igamberdiev, the exploiter used 243,000 CELO tokens and in turn loaned 60,000 CELO to Moola to borrow 1.8 million MOO for use as collateral. With the remaining CELO, the exploiter pumped the price of MOO and proceeded to use the borrowed MOO as collateral to borrow tokens across a series of other DeFi lending protocols. For the efforts, the attacker netted 8.8 million CELO ($6.5 million), 765,000 cEUR ($700,000), 1.8 million MOO ($600,000), and 644,000 cUSD ($600,000). Moola Market said its team is actively investigating the incident and that all activity on the platform has been paused. In the meantime, users are advised by Moola not to trade mTokens.

DeFi lending protocol Moola Market hit by $8.4 million exploit

Bitcoin Trading Enters New Era With SEC-Approved Nasdaq Index Options

$2 Billion Write-Off: Manus Plans Hong Kong IPO for a Comeback?

Data Theft at Will! Major Vulnerability Exposed in This Popular AI Programming Tool

The First Person to Fly by Mars Will Be a Bitcoin Miner

The Revived Codex, Carrying OpenAI's Hopes for IPO

Google CEO Admits Lagging Behind in Coding

Microsoft to Discontinue Using Claude: Too Expensive, or a Calculated Move?

New York Lawsuit Takes Aim At 3.79 Million Dormant Bitcoin

Investors Frantically Snap Up AI Firms with 'No Profits': A High-Stakes Gamble on 'the Right to Define the Future'

The 'Stock Call King' Serenity: 3840% Annual Return, Beating Institutions to the Punch

Article

SEC Chair: Advancing Project Crypto with CFTC to Support U.S. as Global Crypto Hub

DeFi lending protocol Moola Market hit by $8.4 million exploit

Descargo de responsabilidad：El contenido anterior no representa las posiciones de HTX.，HTX no ofrece ninguna recomendación de trading.。

Artículos relacionados

Todos los comentarios0Lo más recientePopular

Temas populares

Artículos relacionados