Chip Rally Cooling Down? Morgan Stanley's Wilson: Funds Are Shifting to AI Hyperscalers Like Microsoft, Amazon

marsbitPublished on 2026-07-06Last updated on 2026-07-06

Abstract

Market strategist Michael Wilson of Morgan Stanley notes a shift in investment flows from high-flying semiconductor stocks toward AI hyperscale cloud computing giants like Microsoft, Amazon, and Meta. He observes waning momentum in the chip sector, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index down nearly 14% from its recent peak amid valuation concerns, despite a 123% rally since last September. Wilson argues this rotation is occurring against a backdrop of overall market weakness, keeping pressure on major indices, though he maintains a year-end S&P 500 target of 8000, implying roughly 7% upside. The report highlights AI hyperscalers as relatively undervalued within the AI ecosystem, with a basket of such stocks compiled by UBS having fallen 2% since last September. Wilson believes their strong core businesses provide solid footing, though he cautions they may soon temper capital expenditure forecasts in response to market worries over excessive AI spending. The rotation is also expected to benefit sectors beyond tech, such as consumer discretionary, transportation, and biotech. This view aligns with JPMorgan's Mislav Matejka, who anticipates a broadening of market gains beyond the technology sector in the second half of the year.

Author: Bu Shuqing, Wall Street News Agency

U.S. stock markets may struggle to hit new highs in the short term, as funds flow out from this year's best-performing semiconductor stocks towards AI hyperscale cloud providers.

Morgan Stanley's chief equity strategist, Michael Wilson, pointed out in a latest report that momentum in the semiconductor sector is fading, and investors are starting to shift towards this year's underperforming AI hyperscale giants, including Microsoft, Amazon, and Meta.

He believes this rotation is occurring against a backdrop of overall choppy and weak market performance, with major indices continuing to face pressure. Wilson simultaneously maintained his year-end S&P 500 target at 8000 points, implying approximately 7% upside from current levels.

The direct market impact of this assessment is that chip stocks, which previously led the AI rally, face valuation pressure, while hyperscalers, with their strong core businesses, are poised to become the new landing spot for funds. Meanwhile, JPMorgan strategist Mislav Matejka holds a similar view, expecting the market's gains to broaden beyond the tech sector in the second half of the year.

Chip Momentum Fading, Valuation Pressure Emerges

The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index has fallen nearly 14% since hitting a record high last month, with concerns about a valuation bubble persisting. Nonetheless, the index has still surged 123% cumulatively since September last year, highlighting the magnitude of its previous gains.

Micron Technology's better-than-expected sales forecast last month failed to sustain the chip stock rally, further confirming the sector's fading momentum. Currently, investors are awaiting comments from companies like Nvidia for more clues on AI chip demand.

Wilson points out that the breakdown in momentum is happening among large, index-weighting companies, which will keep major U.S. benchmark indices under pressure in the near term. The S&P 500 index has been gradually retreating since peaking in early June.

Hyperscalers: Value Opportunity Within the AI Ecosystem

Wilson stated he has recently favored hyperscalers over semiconductor-related stocks. He believes companies like Microsoft, Amazon, and Meta are attractive within the AI ecosystem, primarily because their robust underlying businesses provide solid support.

In contrast, according to Bloomberg data, a basket of hyperscaler stocks compiled by UBS Group has fallen 2% cumulatively since last September, forming a stark contrast with the gains in the semiconductor sector and implying relative catch-up potential for this group.

However, Wilson also anticipates that hyperscalers may begin to moderate expectations for their capital expenditure plans in response to recent market concerns about excessive AI investment. The outlook for capital spending will become a core focus for investors in the next phase.

Rotation Broadening, Opportunities Outside Tech Emerge

Wilson's rotation thesis is not confined to the hyperscale sector. He is also optimistic about the consumer discretionary, transportation, and biotechnology sectors benefiting from the fund outflow from chip stocks.

JPMorgan strategist Mislav Matejka aligns with Wilson's view, expecting market gains to extend beyond the tech sector in the second half of the year. "AI is unlikely to be the only game in town," Matejka wrote in a research note.

It is worth noting that Wilson previously correctly predicted that U.S. stock markets would remain resilient amid geopolitical risks due to strong corporate earnings, lending some credibility to his current assessment. His year-end S&P 500 target of 8000 points implies about 7% potential upside from current levels, but short-term volatility risks cannot be ignored.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QAccording to Morgan Stanley's Michael Wilson, what are the two main areas where a shift in investor capital is occurring in the U.S. stock market?

AAccording to Michael Wilson, investor capital is flowing out of semiconductor stocks, which have seen significant gains, and is rotating towards AI hyperscalers like Microsoft, Amazon, and Meta.

QWhat specific evidence from the semiconductor market does the article cite to show that its momentum is fading?

AThe article cites that the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index has fallen nearly 14% from its all-time high last month and that strong sales forecasts from companies like Micron Technology failed to sustain a rally, indicating fading momentum.

QWhy does Michael Wilson find AI hyperscalers like Microsoft and Amazon attractive for investment compared to semiconductor stocks?

AWilson finds them attractive because their strong core businesses provide a solid foundation within the AI ecosystem, and their stocks have significantly underperformed the semiconductor sector, suggesting potential for relative catch-up.

QBeyond technology stocks, which other sectors does Michael Wilson believe could benefit from the rotation of funds away from semiconductors?

AMichael Wilson believes the consumer discretionary, transportation, and biotech sectors could benefit from the rotation of funds away from semiconductor stocks.

QWhat is Michael Wilson's year-end target for the S&P 500 index, and what does it imply for potential market movement?

AMichael Wilson maintains a year-end target of 8000 for the S&P 500, which implies approximately 7% potential upside from current levels, though he also warns of near-term volatility and pressure on major indexes.

Related Reads

What's It Like Working with Two "Madmen": Peter Thiel and Elon Musk? Palantir Co-founder Shares His Experience

Joe Lonsdale, co-founder of Palantir and a member of the "PayPal Mafia," shared his experiences working alongside Elon Musk and Peter Thiel. He described both as highly opinionated, ambitious, and intolerant of broken systems, demanding immediate fixes and rapid execution. Thiel is characterized as a strategic philosopher, while Musk is a hands-on engineer deeply involved in technical details. Musk is noted as one of the hardest workers Lonsdale has ever seen, a trait common in PayPal's early, passionate culture that later spawned numerous billion-dollar companies. Lonsdale recounted Palantir's origin story. While working at Thiel's hedge fund, he and Thiel discussed how Silicon Valley's technology far outpaced the government's, especially after 9/11. They saw an opportunity to build a platform to help stop terrorist attacks while protecting civil liberties. Their initial venture capital pitches were met with rejection and ridicule. However, Thiel viewed this as motivation. Critical funding eventually came from the CIA's venture arm and Thiel himself. Reflecting on Palantir's impact, Lonsdale believes their work helped neutralize thousands of terrorists and ensured government oversight, though he acknowledges the potential dangers if such powerful technology is misused. His key takeaway echoes Thiel's early advice: being rejected and laughed at can fuel the determination to prove the doubters wrong.

marsbit30m ago

What's It Like Working with Two "Madmen": Peter Thiel and Elon Musk? Palantir Co-founder Shares His Experience

marsbit30m ago

15 Reasoning Models Flip Collectively: Unpacking the Latent Risks Hidden in the Chain of Thought Behind Their Outputs

"15 Reasoning Models Collectively Fail: Revealing Hidden Risks in Chain-of-Thought Outputs" A systematic study led by researchers from Harvard, USC, Brown, and MIT warns that evaluating only the final output of large reasoning models (LRMs) is insufficient for safety. The research highlights that the intermediate reasoning chains (CoT) these models expose can contain dangerous content—like bomb-making instructions or poisoning recipes—even when the final answer appears safe. The core methodology involves separately assessing the reasoning chain and the final answer against 20 safety principles, each scored 1-5 for risk. This identifies three key failure modes: 'Unsafe' (both stages unsafe), 'Leak' (unsafe reasoning but safe answer), and 'Escape' (safe reasoning but unsafe answer). The team evaluated 15 reasoning models on a combined in-distribution dataset of 41K prompts from seven public harmful/jailbreak datasets. A universal finding across all 15 models was that reasoning chains are consistently riskier than final answers. Risk is concentrated in categories like misinformation, illegal activity, bias, and physical/psychological harm, with illegal compliance showing the starkest divergence. Case studies reveal instances where harmful operational details are 'leaked' in reasoning or a seemingly harmless chain 'escapes' into a dangerous final answer. To mitigate this, the researchers propose 'Adaptive Multi-Principle Steering,' a white-box, test-time intervention method. It identifies unsafe principles being activated during reasoning and gently steers the model's internal representations towards safer directions. Validated on open-source models, this approach reduced unsafe outputs by up to 40.8% while preserving 97.7% of benchmark performance. The work underscores the critical need to monitor and secure the entire reasoning process, not just the final output.

marsbit34m ago

15 Reasoning Models Flip Collectively: Unpacking the Latent Risks Hidden in the Chain of Thought Behind Their Outputs

marsbit34m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片