Zcash's 10x Growth in a Year Fails to Save Mining Company Fortitude from Losses

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-07-28Last updated on 2026-07-28

Abstract

Despite a 1000% annual increase in the price of Zcash (ZEC), mining company Fortitude Mining Holdings, owned by Barry Silbert's Digital Currency Group, is facing significant losses and debt issues. According to an SEC filing, Fortitude took on a $26 million loan in June 2026, with over $8.3 million borrowed before issuing an investment prospectus that claimed no outstanding debt. The company positions itself as a leader in Zcash mining, but only 28% of its $89 million 2025 mining revenue came from ZEC, with 65% derived from Bitcoin. Fortitude reported net losses of $14.3 million in 2024, $12.6 million in 2025, and $4.6 million in Q1 2026. It presented a positive adjusted EBITDA of $20 million by adding substantial depreciation costs, which in mining represent real equipment wear-and-tear expenses. Furthermore, its merger partner, AI software developer HeartSciences Inc., reported only $4,000 in revenue over a recent 12-month period and has seen its stock decline by 34% from June highs after an initial spike. Upon merger completion, the combined entity will trade under the ticker "TUDE," with DCG retaining a majority stake.

Fortitude Mining Holdings, a mining company owned by Barry Silbert's Digital Currency Group (DCG) that mines the anonymous cryptocurrency Zcash, has encountered significant debt obligations and multi-million dollar losses.

In June 2026, Fortitude published investor materials reporting no debt for a specific period in the 2025 fiscal year. However, according to a Form 8-K filed on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) website, the company had signed a $26 million credit agreement on June 1, with over $8.3 million of that debt raised prior to the publication of the June prospectus.

Fortitude's positioning as the unequivocal leader in Zcash ($ZEC) mining is also called into question upon analyzing its revenue structure. It is known that out of $89 million in total mining revenue in 2025, only 28% came from mining $ZEC. The overwhelming majority of revenue, 65% or $58 million, came from Bitcoin (BTC) mining.

Notably, even an impressive 1000% growth in $ZEC over the past 12 months and 1400% growth over three years did not minimize Fortitude's losses. In 2024, the net loss was $14.3 million, in 2025 it was $12.6 million, and in the first quarter of 2026, losses reached $4.6 million.

To soften the negative tone in their presentation, Fortitude's marketers emphasized an adjusted EBITDA of $20 million. This figure was achieved via a questionable method: approximately $32 million in depreciation charges were added to the net loss. In the mining industry, depreciation is not a paper formality; it represents real costs associated with equipment wear and tear due to overheating, corrosion, and technological obsolescence.

Certain risks are also posed by the chosen merger partner, Texas-based AI-based software developer HeartSciences Inc. After the deal announcement on June 23, HeartSciences shares rose by 57%.

However, according to documents filed with the SEC, for the 12 months ended April 30, 2026, HeartSciences' revenue was only $4,000 despite a huge accumulated deficit. Consequently, the company's stock price rapidly declined, falling 34% from its June highs and settling in the range of $2.34–2.45 per share. Upon completion of the deal, the combined company is expected to trade under the ticker "TUDE," with DCG retaining an absolute majority of the shares.

end-content

Related Questions

QWhat is the main reason why Fortitude Mining Holdings is facing financial difficulties, despite the significant growth of Zcash?

ADespite Zcash's impressive growth of 1000% over 12 months, Fortitude Mining Holdings is facing financial difficulties primarily due to substantial net losses. The company reported net losses of $14.3 million in 2024, $12.6 million in 2025, and $4.6 million in Q1 2026. Additionally, a large portion of its revenue comes from Bitcoin mining (65%), not Zcash, and it has taken on significant debt, including an $8.3 million loan disclosed after presenting itself as debt-free.

QAccording to the article, what percentage of Fortitude's total mining revenue in 2025 actually came from Zcash mining?

AIn 2025, only 28% of Fortitude's total mining revenue of $89 million came from mining Zcash. The majority, 65% or $58 million, came from Bitcoin (BTC) mining.

QHow did Fortitude's marketing team calculate the adjusted EBITDA figure of $20 million mentioned in the presentation?

AFortitude's marketing team calculated the adjusted EBITDA of $20 million by adding approximately $32 million in depreciation charges to the company's net loss. The article criticizes this as questionable, stating that in the mining industry, depreciation represents real costs from equipment wear and tear, overheating, corrosion, and technological obsolescence.

QWhat financial details about HeartSciences Inc., Fortitude's merger partner, raise concerns as presented in the article?

AThe financial details about HeartSciences Inc. that raise concerns are its extremely low revenue and significant accumulated deficit. For the 12 months ending April 30, 2026, HeartSciences reported revenue of only $4,000. Following the merger announcement, its stock price initially rose 57% but then fell 34% from its June highs.

QWhat contradictory information does the article highlight regarding Fortitude's debt situation based on SEC filings?

AThe article highlights a contradiction between Fortitude's investor materials claiming no debt for a certain period in fiscal 2025 and an SEC Form 8-K filing. The SEC filing reveals that on June 1, the company signed a credit agreement for $26 million, of which over $8.3 million was drawn as debt *before* the publication of the June prospectus that portrayed the company as debt-free.

Related Reads

In Conversation with Ray Dalio: We Are Currently in an AI Bubble, with 1% of My Portfolio in Bitcoin

Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, warns in an interview that the current AI boom shows classic bubble characteristics, which could lead to significant economic downturns as seen in past cycles like 1929 or 2000. He explains that speculative enthusiasm, fueled by debt and overvaluation, often precedes a crash when rising rates or taxation force asset sales, causing widespread losses and recession. Dalio also outlines his "Big Cycle" theory, describing an approximate 80-year pattern where widening wealth gaps, massive government deficits, and shifting geopolitical power (like China's rise) create internal conflict and global instability. He emphasizes that we are in a late-cycle, transitional phase where traditional powers like the US and UK face decline. For personal wealth protection, Dalio advises diversification beyond cash into assets like stocks, bonds, real estate, and particularly gold, which he prefers over Bitcoin. While he holds about 1% of his portfolio in Bitcoin as a non-printable hard asset, he views gold as more secure from technological or governmental threats. Regarding AI's impact, Dalio believes it will disproportionately benefit capital owners, worsening inequality by replacing both physical and cognitive labor. He suggests that human intuition and emotional intelligence, combined with AI, will be key for future workers. On taxation, Dalio argues that wealth taxes are impractical and risk triggering asset sell-offs, reducing productive investment. He points to the UK as a cautionary example of debt, low productivity, and political strife. Geopolitically, Dalio foresees a more regionalized world, with the US showing weakness in prolonged conflicts like with Iran, akin to past imperial declines. The ideal outcome, he suggests, is coexisting powerful blocs (e.g., Americas, China-Asia Pacific) without major war.

marsbit1h ago

In Conversation with Ray Dalio: We Are Currently in an AI Bubble, with 1% of My Portfolio in Bitcoin

marsbit1h ago

Daily 7.2 Trillion KRW: Foreign Capital's Record Net Buying on Friday! Wall Street Says Headwinds for Korean Stock Fund Flows Have Subsided

South Korean stock market sees a dramatic shift in fund flows. On July 31, foreign investors made a record net purchase of approximately KRW 7.2 trillion in KOSPI stocks, marking a fundamental reversal from the persistent large-scale net outflows seen in previous months. This contributed to a significant narrowing of foreign net selling in July to KRW 9.8 trillion, down sharply from KRW 48.4 trillion in June and KRW 44.5 trillion in May. Simultaneously, domestic institutional pressure eased. South Korean pension funds and asset managers turned to a net buying position in July, purchasing KRW 1.0 trillion worth of KOSPI shares, contrasting with net sales in May and June. Market volatility is expected to be dampened by new financial regulations. Effective July 31, the Financial Services Commission tightened access for retail investors to single-stock leveraged ETFs by raising the minimum cash deposit requirement. Trading volumes for these products subsequently dropped to about 50% of their monthly average. Citigroup Research maintains its year-end KOSPI target of 10,000 points. The firm cites several supportive factors: the substantial easing of headwinds from capital outflows, a robust fundamental outlook for the semiconductor sector, historically low market valuations, strong economic fundamentals, and the potential for policy support from financial authorities if needed.

marsbit1h ago

Daily 7.2 Trillion KRW: Foreign Capital's Record Net Buying on Friday! Wall Street Says Headwinds for Korean Stock Fund Flows Have Subsided

marsbit1h ago

Thanks to Dice Rolls, Bitcoin Keys Are Stored Offline, But Not Everyone Will Do It

The article discusses using dice rolls to generate secure Bitcoin wallet seeds, providing entropy independent of potentially flawed hardware random number generators. It explains that each fair dice roll offers about 2.585 bits of entropy, with around 50 rolls needed for a standard 12-word seed phrase and 99+ recommended for higher security. This method gained attention after a vulnerability was revealed in some Coldcard hardware wallets, where a faulty firmware RNG (dating back to 2021) compromised generated keys. The analysis notes that while a dice-generated main seed was safe from this specific flaw, other Coldcard functions (like creating paper wallets, backup keys, or passwords) could still be vulnerable if they used the defective RNG. The piece argues that while dice-based entropy is technically robust, the manual process is error-prone, tedious, and unrealistic for most new users, who might make mistakes in recording or inputting rolls. It concludes that while manual entropy generation should remain an option for advanced users, the long-term goal is to develop reliable, user-friendly hardware and software that securely generates randomness without requiring specialized knowledge. Coldcard users are advised to check their firmware version and replace any secondary secrets (like paper wallet keys) created with vulnerable devices, while also considering multi-signature setups with devices from different manufacturers for added security.

cryptonews.ru6h ago

Thanks to Dice Rolls, Bitcoin Keys Are Stored Offline, But Not Everyone Will Do It

cryptonews.ru6h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片