Wyoming Moves FRNT from LayerZero to Chainlink CCIP

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-19Last updated on 2026-08-19

Abstract

The Wyoming Stable Token Commission, the state-issued digital dollar issuer, has migrated the Frontier Stable Token (FRNT) from LayerZero to Chainlink's Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP). Under a multi-year agreement, CCIP will become the exclusive infrastructure for the token's cross-chain interoperability, providing data and asset transfer between blockchains. FRNT is the first fiat-collateralized stablecoin issued by a U.S. state authority, designed for payments, settlements, and other government and commercial operations. It currently operates on multiple networks including Arbitrum, Avalanche, Base, Ethereum, Hedera, Optimism, Polygon, and Solana. Initially using LayerZero's Omnichain Fungible Token standard for multi-chain issuance, the Commission decided to move away from that system following a review of LayerZero's information disclosure and operational security practices. Wyoming has been developing FRNT's multi-chain model since 2023. The shift to CCIP will maintain the token's availability across multiple public blockchains while upgrading the underlying cross-network transfer infrastructure. According to the Commission, this transition aims to enhance operational security as the state expands its use of digital assets.

The Wyoming Stable Token Commission, a state-issued digital dollar issuer, has moved Frontier Stable Token (FRNT) from LayerZero to Chainlink CCIP. As part of a multi-year agreement, CCIP will become the exclusive infrastructure for the token's cross-chain interoperability. Chainlink provides infrastructure for transmitting data and assets between blockchains.

FRNT is the first fiat-collateralized stablecoin issued by a U.S. state authority. The token is intended for payments, settlements, and other government and commercial transactions. Currently, FRNT operates on the Arbitrum, Avalanche, Base, Ethereum, Hedera, Optimism, Polygon, and Solana networks.

The commission initially used LayerZero's Omnichain Fungible Token standard to launch FRNT across multiple blockchains simultaneously. After reviewing LayerZero's approaches to disclosure and operational security, the commission decided to abandon this system.

Wyoming has been developing the FRNT multi-chain model since 2023. The move to CCIP will keep the token accessible across multiple public blockchains while replacing the infrastructure for transferring it between networks. According to the commission, this should enhance operational security as the state expands its use of digital assets.

Image: Magnific

end-content

Related Questions

QWhat is the main news about Wyoming's stablecoin commission and Frontier Stable Token (FRNT)?

AThe Wyoming Stable Token Commission, a state-issued digital dollar issuer, has migrated the Frontier Stable Token (FRNT) from using LayerZero's infrastructure to Chainlink's CCIP for its cross-chain interoperability.

QWhat makes FRNT unique among stablecoins issued in the United States?

AFRNT is the first fiat-reserve-backed stablecoin issued by a U.S. state authority.

QWhich cross-chain interoperability solution was FRNT using before the switch to Chainlink CCIP, and why did the commission decide to change?

AFRNT was initially using LayerZero's Omnichain Fungible Token standard. The commission decided to change after reviewing LayerZero's approaches to information disclosure and operational security guarantees.

QWhat benefit does the Wyoming commission expect from the migration to Chainlink CCIP?

AThe commission expects the migration to CCIP to enhance operational security as the state's use of digital assets expands, while maintaining the token's availability across multiple public blockchains.

QOn which blockchain networks does the FRNT stablecoin currently operate?

AFRNT currently operates on Arbitrum, Avalanche, Base, Ethereum, Hedera, Optimism, Polygon, and Solana networks.

Related Reads

Refuting the Theory of Ethereum "Abandoning" ETH: What Does It Really Mean to Pay Gas Without Using ETH?

The article refutes the notion that Ethereum's proposed EIP-8141 (Frame Transactions) "abandons" ETH, explaining what "paying gas without ETH" truly means. It clarifies that the proposal doesn't eliminate ETH as the base-layer gas fee; instead, it decouples transaction signing, gas payment, and execution. Users could sign a transaction (e.g., sending USDC) while a Paymaster or another account pays the ETH-denominated gas fee on their behalf, later settling with the user in a different asset like USDC. This abstracts gas complexities away from end-users, similar to using a credit card abroad without handling foreign currency. The core goal is to improve UX by removing the significant barrier where new users must first acquire ETH to perform any on-chain action. While ERC-4337 already enables similar functionality, EIP-8141 aims to integrate it more natively into Ethereum's transaction structure. The article argues this shift doesn't inherently make ETH more bullish or bearish. ETH demand doesn't disappear; it shifts from being held by millions of individual users to being managed in larger pools by Paymasters and service providers. The key determinant for ETH's value is whether the improved user experience generates substantial new on-chain activity and transaction volume, thereby increasing overall network usage and ETH burned. If it brings more users who complete more transactions, net ETH consumption could rise despite users not holding it directly.

marsbit10m ago

Refuting the Theory of Ethereum "Abandoning" ETH: What Does It Really Mean to Pay Gas Without Using ETH?

marsbit10m ago

Only 14% of Russian Universities and Research Institutions Have Approved Rules for Using AI

Only 14% of Russian universities and scientific research institutes have officially approved internal regulations governing the use of artificial intelligence (AI), according to a survey conducted in May-June 2026 by HSE's Institute for Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge. The study involved 424 organizations, including 250 universities and 174 research institutes. It found that 72% of these institutions have no such regulations at all, while the remaining 14% did not provide an answer. This absence of formal rules exists despite the widespread practical use of AI in education. The survey highlights a significant gap between the rapid adoption of AI technologies and the slower pace of internal policy development within academia. In contrast, Russia is actively expanding the application of AI in school education. Since September 2026, a professional development program titled "Artificial Intelligence in the Teacher's Work" has been available, aiming to train 250,000 teachers on using neural networks for preparing lessons and assignments by the end of the year. A dedicated "Artificial Intelligence" track for schoolchildren has also been introduced. Thus, two parallel processes are unfolding: the state is promoting AI training for teachers and students, while higher education and research institutions largely lack unified internal guidelines for its use. The analysis suggests this regulatory lag is typical for new technologies, akin to the early adoption of email and the internet. In practice, students and educators are already utilizing AI tools, such as chatbots for routine tasks and exam preparation, regardless of official institutional policies. The key question remains whether future standards will be set by the educational institutions themselves or by the developers of the AI tools already integrated into the learning process.

cryptonews.ru28m ago

Only 14% of Russian Universities and Research Institutions Have Approved Rules for Using AI

cryptonews.ru28m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片