Will the Ethereum Foundation Evolve into a 'Mascot'? Diversified Organizations Are Fragmenting Its Functions

marsbitPublished on 2026-07-12Last updated on 2026-07-12

Abstract

The Ethereum Foundation (EF) is undergoing significant internal turmoil and functional erosion. Following its largest-ever layoff of 54 staff (20% of its workforce) and a major organizational restructuring announced in June, its Protocol Support Team has been officially dissolved. This comes alongside the high-profile resignation of key figures like co-executive director Xiaowei Wang, bringing senior departures this year to at least eight. Criticism of EF's rigid structure, opaque decision-making, and perceived lack of a clear value narrative for ETH has intensified within the community. The layoffs have catalyzed the emergence of independent, non-profit organizations like Ethlabs and Ethereum Institutional, founded by former EF researchers and members. These entities are now taking on core functions such as protocol research/development and institutional adoption, effectively fragmenting the EF's traditional leadership role. Concurrently, EF's security team is adapting to technological change, deploying specialized AI agents to audit Ethereum's codebase, which successfully discovered a critical vulnerability (CVE-2026-34219). While EF states AI complements rather than replaces researchers, it signals a potential future shift in its operational model. Faced with these challenges—internal restructuring, talent drain, the rise of competing organizations, and AI integration—the Ethereum Foundation appears to be stepping back from a central commanding role. Analysts and commun...

Original|Odaily Planet Daily

Author|Wenser

Last night, the Ethereum Foundation's Protocol Support Team officially announced its dissolution. Previously, Xiaowei Wang, the Co-Executive Director of the Ethereum Foundation, seen as 'one of the representatives of EF's organizational reform,' has also formally resigned. So far this year, at least 8 senior personnel have left the Ethereum Foundation.

On the other side of organizational and personnel changes are the fragmentation and functional substitution of the Ethereum Foundation's role by non-profit independent organizations like ETHLabs and Ethereum Institutional; it's also about technical progress, such as the recent use of AI agent red teaming by the Ethereum Foundation's security team to test the ETH network and discover real vulnerabilities.

While ETH's price faces waves of industry scrutiny, what lies before the Ethereum Foundation are more complex and diverse contradictions and tests following its internal reforms. Related to this is the divisive upheaval that Ethereum's leading body is now directly confronting.

The Ethereum Foundation Enters an Era of Decline: Rise of Multiple Players, Brain Drain, and the AI Shift

The Ethereum Foundation (hereafter referred to as EF) has long been criticized for its rigid system, minority decision-making, organizational value, and actions like sales that affect market sentiment. Criticism within the Ethereum community towards EF has been particularly fierce. Not long ago, Bankless founder David Hoffman even went so far as to 'sell his final ETH holdings' to express dissatisfaction with EF and called on the Ethereum community to engage in ecosystem building in its own way.

Now, the official dissolution of EF's Protocol Support Team is like a bolt of lightning, fully exposing the internal conflicts and crisis of division within the EF organization to everyone. It is worth noting that this round of organizational changes is particularly different from the organizational changes initiated by Ethereum founder Vitalik last year—this is a thorough personnel purge, also seen as 'the largest round of layoffs in EF's history,' rather than the previous partial leadership changes.

When Ethereum's Leading Force Chooses to Sever the Tail to Survive: The Story of EF's Major Layoffs

Everything starts with the official announcement 'New EF Structure' formally released by EF on June 23.

In this lengthy article spanning thousands of words, EF categorized the new organizational structure into Protocol Layer, Access Layer, User Layer, Community Layer, and Institutional Layer, and later stated that 'this organizational restructuring resulted in 54 layoffs, accounting for 20% of EF's membership.' Even more disheartening was the announcement's opening mention: 'Through this process, we have gained the structure, activities, and personnel required to execute the critical tasks we will soon face.' In other words, the laid-off personnel and departments were deemed obsolete, unnecessary, and without value.

It must be said that EF, which has always presented itself as a research-focused, ecological leader with a scholarly demeanor, has for the first time revealed the冷酷 (Note: kept as '冷酷' for tone, English equivalent could be 'ruthless' or 'cold') side of its organizational management.

Diagram of EF's New Structure

Dissolution of EF's Protocol Support Department Marks a Significant Sign of EF's Organizational Split

It's worth mentioning that the work of EF's Protocol Support Department leaned towards infrastructure construction, primarily responsible for coordinating the Ethereum protocol development process, including organizing and coordinating core developer meetings, tracking Ethereum network upgrades, supporting EIP progression, and operating the Ethereum protocol. Now, its main functions have been allocated to EF's Protocol Layer section.

On the same day EF announced its new structure, Ethlabs, a non-profit research and development laboratory co-founded by 5 former EF researchers, was officially announced. This organization aims to promote Ethereum as the settlement layer for the global economy and has received support from a series of investment institutions, Ethereum ecosystem projects, independent individuals, and EF foundation members, including Ethereum co-founder Joe Lubin (Sharplink Chairman, Consensys founder), ETH treasury company BitMine (Tom Lee's Ethereum treasury company), Sharplink, and crypto investment firm SNZ.

ETHLabs Community Participant List (Source: Official Account)

On July 1st, Ethereum Institutional, co-founded by former EF members David Walsh, Marius Smith, and Matthew Dawson, officially debuted.

This organization's main concept is 'Ethereum's Institutional Finance Application Plan,' dedicated to promoting the institutionalization and institutional-grade application of Ethereum, its secondary nodes, applications, and the entire ecosystem. Simultaneously, the organization emphasized its collaboration with Ethlabs, Etherealize, and the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance, responsible for connecting institutional needs and explaining Ethereum's value proposition to banks; Ethlabs focuses on translating related needs into technical products. As a non-profit independent institution, Ethereum Institutional will provide free consultation related to Ethereum applications for banks and asset management companies.

A week later, Ethereum Institutional announced the start of core team recruitment, with a focus in the coming weeks on hiring for roles in Institutional Business Development (Institutional GTM), Marketing & Community Operations, as well as technical positions like Solutions Architect and Technical Project Lead.

Thus, the EF layoff turmoil officially concluded with the emergence of two major non-profit independent organizations and the dissolution of the protocol support department, also drawing an imperfect conclusion to the 'internal organizational changes' personally driven by Vitalik last year. Beyond organizational-level fragmentation and the loss of high-level talent like Executive Director Xiaowei Wang, EF also faces the impact of AI technology.

The Era of AI Offense and Defense Begins, EF Security Team Upgrades Testing

Yesterday, researchers from the EF Protocol Security Team stated in a blog post that they had deployed a series of AI agents to test the software relied upon by the Ethereum ecosystem, searching for vulnerabilities in cryptographic systems, protocol code, and smart contracts.

Vulnerabilities discovered by the AI agents include a remotely triggerable panic issue in the libp2p gossipsub point-to-point layer used by Ethereum consensus clients. This issue has been fixed and disclosed on GitHub as CVE-2026-34219.

The researchers stated that the AI agents were organized into specialized roles such as reconnaissance, search, gap-filling, and verification, used to find potential attack paths, reproduce faults, and verify their applicability to production code. EF indicated that AI has not replaced security researchers but has changed the way work is done, enabling the team to cover a far greater scope than manual review, though it requires researchers to exercise more cautious judgment on a large number of seemingly credible conclusions.

Considering today's news of the official launch of the GPT 5.6 model, the future maintenance of Ethereum protocol security may be jointly handled by AI models and EF security researchers. Moreover, although EF currently mentions that 'AI has not replaced researchers,' with the continuous development and evolution of AI models, personnel within the EF security team and even the entire organization may further decrease in the future. In other words, EF will also face the test of AI models on its organizational structure and the execution of its own functions.

Summary: EF Organizational Reforms Reach a Stage Conclusion, May Become an Ecological Mascot in the Future?

In January of last year, we provided a systematic analysis of EF's organizational reforms in the article 'Vitalik Fires the First Shot of 'Reform,' Where is the Ethereum Foundation Heading?' At that time, Vitalik was still ambitiously and forcefully pushing for EF's organizational change; in May this year, after more than a year of organizational innovation, Vitalik's tone shifted instead, stating that 'the Ethereum Foundation should not be the center of the ETH ecosystem and will shift towards a smaller, long-termist path.'

It must be said, after ETH has grown into a multi-hundred-billion dollar asset, the EF, this official ecological organization established nearly a decade ago, has also entered the awkward predicament of 'a large ship is hard to turn.' No wonder Vitalik previously even stated—'no longer writing regular blog posts, deciding to try writing some science fiction on the theme of decentralized governance.'

As former EF researcher and Ethlabs member Ansgar Dietrichs said earlier this month in a podcast, 'After five years of failing to break through $5,000, ETH still lacks a clear value narrative.'

Currently, it appears that EF can hardly shoulder the banner of 'revitalizing the Ethereum ecosystem and driving ETH price breakthroughs.' Future large-scale adoption and institutional-grade investment may now only rest on the hopes of organizations like ETHlabs, Ethereum Institutional, and Etherealize.

Perhaps, in the not-too-distant future, playing the role of an 'ecological mascot' is more suitable for EF.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat major organizational change did the Ethereum Foundation announce in relation to its Protocol Support Team?

AThe Ethereum Foundation officially announced the dissolution of its Protocol Support Team, marking a significant internal restructuring.

QWhat two new non-profit independent organizations emerged following the EF's restructuring and personnel changes?

AFollowing the EF's changes, two new non-profit independent organizations were established: Ethlabs and Ethereum Institutional.

QHow did the Ethereum Foundation's security team recently utilize AI technology, and what was the outcome?

AThe EF security team deployed AI agents to test Ethereum ecosystem software, successfully identifying vulnerabilities such as a remote-triggered panic issue in the libp2p gossipsub library (CVE-2026-34219).

QWhat criticism has been directed at the Ethereum Foundation (EF) according to the article, and who exemplified this dissatisfaction?

AThe EF has been criticized for its rigid structure, minority decision-making, organizational value, and market-affecting token sales. Bankless founder David Hoffman exemplified this by selling his last ETH holdings to protest the EF.

QWhat potential future role for the Ethereum Foundation is suggested in the article's conclusion?

AThe article suggests that in the future, the Ethereum Foundation might be more suited to playing the role of an 'ecosystem mascot' rather than its former central leadership position.

Related Reads

Claude Accused of Becoming Dumber by the Entire Internet, Anthropic Steps In to Reveal: It’s Not the Model That’s Tricking You

When users complained that Claude was "getting dumber," the root cause wasn't the AI model itself. In an official blog post, Anthropic clarified the critical difference between two key settings in Claude Code: Model and Effort. Model refers to the core "brain"—the fixed, trained weights of a specific AI (like Sonnet, Opus, or Fable). Changing the Model addresses *capability* ("can it do this?"), but its knowledge is static post-training. Effort, however, controls the AI's *approach and thoroughness* for a specific task. A higher Effort level instructs Claude to read more files, run tests, perform verification, and complete multi-step reasoning before responding, significantly increasing its "work output" for that job. Conversely, low Effort leads to quicker, less thorough replies. This distinction explains the March 2024 uproar where users experienced a sudden drop in Claude's performance. The cause was not a model change but Anthropic quietly lowering the *default* Effort setting from "high" to "medium" to reduce latency, which was later reverted. The key insight is that a smaller, capable model (like Sonnet) on high Effort can often outperform a larger, more powerful model (like Opus) on low Effort for many tasks. The article provides a practical troubleshooting framework: if Claude makes an error, first check the context and instructions. If it seems to skip necessary steps or validations, increase Effort. If it diligently attempts the task but fails conceptually or makes consistent factual errors despite good context, then consider switching to a more capable Model. The takeaway is a shift in focus: effective AI programming is less about always choosing the "strongest" model and more about intelligently *orchestrating* models and effort levels—acting like a project manager to assign the right "brain" with the right level of diligence for each job, optimizing both results and cost.

marsbit34m ago

Claude Accused of Becoming Dumber by the Entire Internet, Anthropic Steps In to Reveal: It’s Not the Model That’s Tricking You

marsbit34m ago

Nearly a Hundred Players Rush into Embodied Data: With 4.47 Billion Yuan in Financing in One Year, Who Can Really Make Money by 'Selling Data'?

The domestic embodied AI data industry has attracted nearly 100 players, with 70 focused on data collection and 27 on data infrastructure. In the past year, 15 independent embodied data service providers raised approximately 4.47 billion yuan. Despite this growth, the sector remains early-stage, fragmented, and faces significant challenges. Data collection methods are diverse, categorized into four main routes: teleoperation of real robots, human demonstration without a robot (using motion capture, exoskeletons, etc.), simulation synthesis, and distillation from internet videos. Most companies (43%) adopt hybrid approaches, combining multiple routes, as no single method can meet all training needs. Teleoperation alone is pursued by 31% of players, often by state-owned platforms and robot companies, while newer firms favor asset-light, no-hardware human demonstration. Independent data service providers now form the largest player group (40%), indicating the emergence of a distinct industry segment rather than just a subsidiary function for robot makers. Two-thirds of all players are "embodied-native" startups, while one-third are companies that pivoted from fields like AI data annotation, which are more prevalent in the data infrastructure layer. Current annual industry capacity is estimated at 1.6-1.8 million hours plus 70-80 million data points, with a short-term goal to increase this 15-20 fold within 1-3 years. Data collection factories are spread across 20 provinces in China, concentrated in the Yangtze River Delta, Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, and Pearl River Delta regions. Financially, the 4.47 billion yuan raised in the past year pales compared to the 43.8 billion yuan raised by the broader embodied intelligence sector in just the first half of 2026, highlighting that data remains a less "sexy" bet for investors. The 15 funded independent providers show clear stratification: a top tier led by a unicorn (Lightwheel Intelligence, 3.1 billion yuan), a middle tier of 11 firms raising tens to hundreds of millions, and an early-stage tier of 3 companies. Sixty-nine investment institutions have participated, but none have made concentrated bets, reflecting uncertainty about viable business models. Over half of these funded companies are less than a year old, most are at pre-A or A rounds, and profitability remains largely unproven. In summary, the embodied data industry has become an independent track creating jobs and local economic activity. However, it is still nascent, with unformed consensus, unsolved problems, and unproven business models. The coming 1-2 years will be a critical validation window to see if companies can build sustainable, profitable businesses purely by "selling data."

marsbit4h ago

Nearly a Hundred Players Rush into Embodied Data: With 4.47 Billion Yuan in Financing in One Year, Who Can Really Make Money by 'Selling Data'?

marsbit4h ago

Dialogue with Multicoin Partner: The Crypto Market Has Bottomed Out, Favoring Three Cryptocurrencies in This Cycle

In a recent interview, Multicoin Capital managing partner Tushar Jain shared his views on the crypto market. He believes the market has bottomed and is at an inflection point, citing that negative news no longer causes significant price declines and application adoption continues to grow. Jain remains highly bullish on Solana, viewing it as the correct architectural choice for internet capital markets, particularly for spot and tokenized security trading. He is also positive on Hyperliquid, noting its leadership in decentralized derivatives trading. His investment approach focuses on concentrating capital in top convictions rather than equal allocation. A distinct opportunity he highlights is Zcash (ZEC), which he sees as a return to the industry's cypherpunk ethos and a potential top-five asset by market cap. For assets like Zcash without cash flows, his valuation framework is based on relative market cap ranking. Regarding investment strategy, Jain employs a "three-part" entry method to avoid timing pitfalls and emphasizes long-term "active management" over "active trading." He outlines four sources of investment edge: informational, analytical, behavioral/psychological, and structural. On portfolio management, the fund uses Bitcoin as its "cash," selling assets into Bitcoin during market euphoria to reduce beta risk and using Bitcoin to buy dips. Sales occur only if a better opportunity arises, the investment thesis breaks, or valuations become excessively overheated. While respectful of Ethereum's resilience, he questions its unclear scaling roadmap. Finally, Jain reaffirms his commitment to the thesis that blockchains will form the foundational architecture for future capital markets.

marsbit4h ago

Dialogue with Multicoin Partner: The Crypto Market Has Bottomed Out, Favoring Three Cryptocurrencies in This Cycle

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片