Will ETH See Fund Inflows Again? Sharplink and BitMine Make It onto the Russell Index List

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-25Last updated on 2026-05-25

Abstract

Two Ethereum (ETH)-related public companies, Sharplink (SBET) and BitMine (BMNR), will be added to the U.S. Russell Indexes on June 29, 2026. SBET is confirmed for the Russell 2000 and Russell 3000, while BMNR is on the preliminary list for the Russell 3000 and has a high chance of entering the Russell 1000. This inclusion acts as an "automatic shopping list" for massive passive investment funds like ETFs and pension plans, compelling them to buy these stocks to match the index composition. Consequently, millions of mainstream investors who do not directly trade crypto will automatically gain exposure to these Ethereum-linked equities through their index funds. This move channels significant passive capital—trillions of dollars track these indexes—into SBET and BMNR, integrating Ethereum-related investment opportunities into traditional financial portfolios. While the funds buy the companies' stocks, not ETH directly, this is expected to provide short-term price support for the stocks and increase their liquidity and institutional ownership. Over the long term, it could also indirectly incentivize the companies to acquire more ETH.

Author: Lanhu Notes

Two publicly listed companies related to Ethereum (ETH)—Sharplink (SBET) and BitMine (BMNR)—will officially be added to the U.S. Russell Indexes at the market open on June 29, 2026.

The current situation is:

  • SBET (Sharplink) is confirmed to join the Russell 2000 (small-cap index) and the Russell 3000.
  • BMNR (BitMine) is on the preliminary list and is expected to join the Russell 3000, with a high probability of also entering the Russell 1000 (large-cap index).

How to understand this?

Imagine the U.S. has a massive passive investment "automatic shopping system"—such as passive index funds, ETFs, pension funds, 401k plans, etc.

They don't pick stocks themselves; instead, they automatically buy exactly which companies and in what proportions are listed in the Russell Indexes.

SBET and BMNR being added to these lists is equivalent to:

Opening the "floodgates of passive capital" for SBET and BMNR, allowing millions of ordinary investors who don't trade cryptocurrencies or understand Ethereum to automatically hold them. This effectively pushes Ethereum opportunities into the mainstream channels of traditional finance.

Specifically,

The amount of capital tracking the Russell 2000 and Russell 3000 globally is enormous (on the scale of trillions of dollars).

Once officially included, these funds must purchase the corresponding stocks to match the index.

Previously, only investors actively researching crypto would buy these stocks.

Now, after entering the index, the money from mainstream investors (including a large number of retail and institutional investors) who "don't bother picking stocks and only buy index funds" will also automatically flow into SBET and BMNR.

This naturally integrates Ethereum-related investment opportunities into mainstream U.S. traditional financial portfolios.

The buying by passive funds creates real demand, especially around the inclusion生效 date, often providing short-term support for the stock price (the so-called "index inclusion effect").

In the long term, it also enhances stock liquidity and institutional ownership (for many established companies, passive ownership can reach 20-25% or more).

It's important to note that passive funds are buying SBET and BMNR stocks, not ETH. To match the index, funds must buy these two stocks; they won't go directly to an exchange to buy ETH. However, this will indirectly encourage the companies to buy more ETH.

Related Questions

QWhich two Ethereum-related public companies are set to be added to the US Russell indexes, and when does the addition take effect?

AThe two companies are Sharplink (SBET) and BitMine (BMNR). They are scheduled to be officially added to the Russell indexes at the US market open on June 29, 2026.

QWhat is the significance of a company being added to the Russell indexes in terms of capital inflows?

AInclusion in the Russell indexes opens the 'floodgates of passive capital.' Passive investment vehicles like index funds, ETFs, and pension funds that track these indexes are mandated to automatically buy the stock, channeling billions from mainstream traditional investors who may not otherwise invest in crypto-related assets into these companies.

QInto which specific Russell indexes are Sharplink (SBET) and BitMine (BMNR) being added?

ASharplink (SBET) is confirmed for addition to the Russell 2000 and Russell 3000 indexes. BitMine (BMNR) is on the preliminary list for the Russell 3000 and has a high probability of also entering the Russell 1000 index.

QDoes the direct purchase of these companies' stock by passive funds equate to a direct purchase of Ethereum (ETH)?

ANo, it does not. Passive funds buying SBET and BMNR stock is a direct purchase of the company's equity to match the index composition. It is not a direct purchase of Ethereum (ETH) on cryptocurrency exchanges. However, the article suggests this capital inflow could indirectly encourage the companies themselves to acquire more ETH.

QWhat are the potential market effects, both short-term and long-term, of a stock's inclusion in a major index like the Russell?

AShort-term, inclusion often creates buying pressure around the effective date, providing price support (the 'index inclusion effect'). Long-term, it increases the stock's liquidity and raises its institutional ownership percentage, as passive funds typically hold their positions, with mature companies often having 20-25%+ passive ownership.

Related Reads

Vitalik on the Future of the Ethereum Foundation: A Smaller, More Distinct, but Longer-Lasting Ship

Vitalik discusses the future direction of the Ethereum Foundation (EF), emphasizing a shift towards a smaller, more focused, and longer-lasting organization. He clarifies this is his personal view and that his own influence within EF is diminishing, which he welcomes. The key driver is aligning EF's actions with its stated values of decentralization, privacy, and being a "sanctuary technology," addressing criticism that its operations haven't fully reflected these ideals. He argues that EF should not be the "center" of Ethereum but one node among many with a specific mandate. With limited resources (holding only ~0.16% of all ETH), EF must focus its remaining efforts on long-term, mission-critical activities that wouldn't happen without its push, particularly those reinforcing Ethereum's core CROPS values (Censorship-Resistance, Resilience, Openness, Privacy, Security). This means making hard choices, potentially spinning out even respected projects to attract external capital, and cultivating a distinct cultural stance. The core technical vision is for Ethereum to be "amazing" not by chasing maximal throughput, but by excelling in the CROPS dimension. Key goals include: a provably bug-free Ethereum via AI-assisted formal verification; high-availability chain consensus combining the best of BFT and Bitcoin-style security; and minimization of intermediaries in transaction sending and user experience. These "unreasonable" ambitions aim to make Ethereum profoundly impressive in its core values, which also support ETH as a robust asset. The future EF will be a smaller, more opinionated ship built for longevity and meaningful impact.

链捕手5m ago

Vitalik on the Future of the Ethereum Foundation: A Smaller, More Distinct, but Longer-Lasting Ship

链捕手5m ago

Tech Mogul Gavin Baker's Three Counter-Consensus Calls: Trainium is Undervalued, TSMC is Saving the Market, and Space-Based Computing Will 'Show Its Mettle' Within Two Years

Tech investor Gavin Baker recently shared contrarian views at the Sohn 2026 conference. He argues Amazon's Trainium AI chip is the most undervalued, citing its unique capability for running modern MoE AI models via switched scaleup networks, a feature he says only it and Nvidia's infrastructure possess. He predicts Trainium 3's 2026 impact will mirror TPU's in 2025. Baker believes TSMC's cautious expansion, resisting Nvidia's push for rapid capacity increases, is helping prevent an AI bubble by imposing a real-world physical constraint on supply. On orbital compute, Baker forecasts feasibility will be proven within two years, with space-based data centers gaining meaningful market share by decade's end, potentially disrupting ground-based power and cooling suppliers. Regarding the memory cycle, while historical patterns suggest selling now, Baker compares the current situation to the mid-1990s "true capacity cycle," implying it may still be early. He also expects faster-than-expected AI revenue growth as pricing shifts from subscriptions to pay-per-use models. His core investment philosophy emphasizes reading over management meetings and a lifelong struggle to act on the "sell the losers, keep the winners" principle.

marsbit8m ago

Tech Mogul Gavin Baker's Three Counter-Consensus Calls: Trainium is Undervalued, TSMC is Saving the Market, and Space-Based Computing Will 'Show Its Mettle' Within Two Years

marsbit8m ago

Leading Players in Large Models Drain the Primary Market

The AI industry is witnessing an unprecedented concentration of capital into a handful of leading players, signaling what insiders call the "eve of a final shakeout." A staggering funding surge exceeding $7 billion hit just three Chinese companies in May alone—Kimi, StepFun (接近完成融资), and DeepSeek—with the latter's valuation reaching $45-$50 billion. Globally, giants like OpenAI, Anthropic, and SpaceX (set to merge with xAI) are preparing for public listings, collectively eyeing valuations over $3 trillion. This capital is no longer fueling a broad "hundred-model war" but is being funneled to "refuel" the final few contenders, following a sector-wide attrition rate exceeding 90%. This frenzy is driven by a fundamental shift in industry logic. The focus has moved from比拼模型智商 (competing on model intelligence) to "token factory economics." The explosion of long-context AI agents has massively increased token consumption per task. With token supply constrained by bottlenecks in HBM memory and power infrastructure—key factors in production costs—dominance now hinges on owning and efficiently operating large-scale compute resources. Major tech firms are investing hundreds of billions annually in this AI "power grid." Consequently, competition pivots to three core areas: 1) **Monetization** as the "AGI premium" cools, forcing a shift from user growth to revenue; 2) **Cost efficiency**, where reducing inference costs becomes the ultimate KPI as model capabilities commoditize; and 3) **Strategic path divergence** between enterprise-focused AI (prioritizing integration and reliability) and consumer-facing applications (betting on scale and user engagement). The message is clear: the final capital injections are determining the endgame lineup. Success will depend not just on technical prowess, but on transforming technology into a sustainable, profitable business model with demonstrable return on massive compute investments.

marsbit14m ago

Leading Players in Large Models Drain the Primary Market

marsbit14m ago

AI Giants Queueing Up for IPOs: Is This the 'Last Dance' for the U.S. Stock Market?

A massive wave of IPOs from AI giants like OpenAI, Anthropic, and SpaceX is taking shape, potentially reshaping the U.S. stock market. OpenAI is reportedly preparing for a historic IPO, targeting a valuation over $1 trillion and raising roughly $60 billion, which would dwarf previous records. Anthropic is also advancing its own IPO plans, projecting significant revenue growth and achieving quarterly operating profit. However, their financial profiles starkly differ. While Anthropic is nearing profitability with a focus on enterprise clients, OpenAI continues to report substantial losses, with a negative operating margin and expectations for positive cash flow only by 2029-2030. Analysts warn these listings could trigger a major "passive fund reshuffle," forcing index funds to sell holdings in established tech giants to make room for the new entrants, potentially pressuring the broader market. Some observers view the IPO rush as a "risk transfer," allowing early private investors to cash out at peak valuations while passing future financial uncertainty to public market investors. The divergent paths of Anthropic's near-term profitability versus OpenAI's long-term, high-cost growth narrative present a critical choice for investors. The outcome of these IPOs is seen as a major swing factor for risk assets in 2026, testing whether this surge marks a new cycle or a potential peak.

marsbit22m ago

AI Giants Queueing Up for IPOs: Is This the 'Last Dance' for the U.S. Stock Market?

marsbit22m ago

The Richest Fed Chair in 112 Years Is Here: Kevin Warsh Is Rewriting the Rules

Kevin Warsh, with a personal fortune exceeding $130 million, became the 112nd and wealthiest Chair of the U.S. Federal Reserve on May 22nd. A former Wall Street investment banker and key figure during the 2008 financial crisis, Warsh lacks a traditional academic background for a central banker but brings deep market experience. He proposes an unconventional policy approach of simultaneously reducing the Fed's balance sheet ("quantitative tightening") while cutting interest rates, arguing that a smaller balance sheet would allow for more effective rate policy. His ascent marks a potential regime change at the Fed. Warsh aims to reform the institution's decision-making processes, tighten communication discipline among officials, and reduce reliance on forward guidance like the "dot plot." This shift responds to the Fed's current dilemma: fiscal policy is expanding the government's balance sheet through deficits, while monetary policy's ability to shrink its own $6.7 trillion balance sheet is severely constrained, creating pressure on long-term interest rates. Analysts expect Warsh's tenure to sustain high volatility in the U.S. Treasury market due to persistent supply pressures. Furthermore, his leadership coincides with a gradual, structural erosion of dollar dominance, evidenced by its declining share in global reserves and cracks in the petrodollar system, with increased use of alternatives like the Chinese yuan in oil trade. For investors, this environment underscores the importance of portfolio diversification, including assets like gold and Chinese sovereign bonds, amid a fluctuating dollar credit anchor.

链捕手37m ago

The Richest Fed Chair in 112 Years Is Here: Kevin Warsh Is Rewriting the Rules

链捕手37m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions