US Regulator Warns Prediction Markets Against Simplifying Terms in Event Contracts

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-07-27Last updated on 2026-07-27

Abstract

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), which positions itself as the leading regulator of prediction markets run by companies like Kalshi and Polymarket, issued a warning on Friday. It reminded these companies that they must not simplify the certification procedure for event contracts covering a wide range of topics. The CFTC stated that companies should not submit general, template certifications, marking the second time in recent months the regulator has warned against overly broad filings. The agency noted that many designated contract markets continue to self-certify event contracts using generic templates without providing the terms for each specific offering or a proper analysis of the product's compliance. The regulator warned that circumventing the proper procedure undermines its ability to determine if a firm has provided all necessary information and adequately assessed the settlement methodology and data sources for all contract options. However, the CFTC clarified that closely related event contracts can be certified as a single class, referencing legitimate ways to file consolidated documents. The explosive growth of the event contract market, especially in sports betting and political outcome prediction, presents a dynamic regulatory challenge. This is due to the industry's relative inexperience and ongoing legal uncertainty about the CFTC's regulatory status. The CFTC's role as the primary regulator is itself facing legal challenges, with cour...

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), which positions itself as the leading regulator of prediction markets managed by companies like Kalshi, Coinbase, Polymarket, and Crypto.com, issued a warning on Friday reminding these companies that simplifying the contract certification procedure covering a wide range of events is not permissible.

The agency stated that 'general, template certificates should not be submitted,' marking the second instance in recent months where the regulator had to caution against overly generalized documents.

Many of the 'designated contract markets' regulated by the CFTC 'continue to self-certify event contracts' (in other words, prediction market contracts) using general templates, 'without providing the terms for each offered combination, as well as a brief explanation and analysis of the product terms, underlying commodity, and the product’s compliance with requirements,' the agency said in a statement.

The regulator stated that bypassing the procedure could undermine its ability to determine whether a firm has provided 'all necessary information, explanations, and analysis,' as well as whether it has 'adequately assessed the settlement methodology, data sources, and compliance with the core principles of all contract options.'

Nevertheless, the agency clarified that 'closely related event contracts may be certified as a single class,' citing legitimate ways to submit consolidated filings with common appendices.

The explosive growth of the event contract market - particularly in the areas of sports betting and political outcome prediction - to some extent represents a situation requiring an on-the-fly solution, given the relative inexperience of much of the industry and the uncertainty of the CFTC's legal status.

The CFTC's status as the primary regulator of prediction markets itself still faces some legal uncertainty, which is expected to be resolved by the courts - perhaps at some point by the U.S. Supreme Court. While the regulator's chairman, Mike Selig, has made it an agency priority to wage a full-scale battle in state and federal courts across the country, insisting that the CFTC bears sole responsibility for overseeing event contract platforms, a large number of states are pursuing these companies on charges of illegal sports betting, which should be regulated at the state level.

Also on Friday, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) issued a notice extending the regulatory status of the Kraken platform, the Kraken Derivatives Exchange, which had been in 'inactive' status. The last trade on this exchange was made in early 2025, and the CFTC's approval of the company's request means 'granting the registered entity the opportunity to resume operations.' Kraken stated that it needs more time to evaluate its next steps following the acquisition of Bitnomial earlier this year.

end-content

Related Questions

QWhich U.S. regulator issued a warning about simplifying event contract certifications?

AThe U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) issued the warning.

QWhat specific practice did the CFTC warn prediction market companies against in their certification process?

AThe CFTC warned companies against filing general, template certificates for event contracts without providing terms, explanations, and analysis for each specific contract combination offered.

QWhat potential problem does the CFTC say is caused by the 'template' certification approach?

AIt undermines the CFTC's ability to determine if a firm has provided all necessary information and adequately assessed the settlement methodology, data sources, and compliance of all contract options.

QWhat legal uncertainty surrounds the CFTC's role as the main regulator of prediction markets, according to the article?

AThe CFTC's status as the primary regulator faces legal uncertainty, with disputes expected to be resolved in courts (potentially the U.S. Supreme Court), as many states pursue these companies for what they claim are illegal sports bets under state-level oversight.

QWhat other regulatory action did the CFTC take on the same Friday, as mentioned in the article?

AThe CFTC issued a notice extending the regulatory status of the 'inactive' Kraken Derivatives Exchange platform, allowing the entity to resume activities if it chooses.

Related Reads

US Senate Makes Important Amendments to "Conflict of Interest" Section of Cryptocurrency Bill

The U.S. Senate has taken a key step regarding the CLARITY Act, which could shape the future of the U.S. crypto market. On July 29, Senators Tom Tillis and Ruben Gallego finalized amendments to the bill's "conflict of interest" rules, one of its most contentious aspects. The bipartisan bill aims to tighten restrictions on high-level federal officials' ties to digital assets. The new text, crafted as an alternative to a White House-endorsed ethics code, is expected to impose stricter rules limiting officials' ability to issue or directly participate in digital asset projects. However, with Congress entering an August recess and the revised text not yet reviewed by much of the Senate, the bill's timeline is uncertain. Senate Majority Leader John Thune indicated a procedural vote could occur between July 29 and August 1 but expressed doubt the full bill could pass before the break. The House-approved CLARITY Act, passed in July 2025, has been under Senate negotiation for over a year. Key goals of the CLARITY Act include clarifying jurisdictional boundaries between the SEC and CFTC, setting rules for digital commodity spot markets, and addressing topics like stablecoin yields, DeFi, and illicit financing. The stablecoin yield provisions could significantly impact U.S.-based DeFi protocols, exchanges, and issuers, affecting their global competitiveness. The outcome is being closely watched by both the U.S. and global digital asset markets.

cryptonews.ru17m ago

US Senate Makes Important Amendments to "Conflict of Interest" Section of Cryptocurrency Bill

cryptonews.ru17m ago

Pavel Durov Designated as a Terrorist in Russia. What Does This Mean for Telegram Users?

Pavel Durov, the founder of Telegram, has been added to Russia's list of terrorists and extremists by Rosfinmonitoring, as published on July 30. The entry includes his name and date of birth. The designation follows an announcement by the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) on July 29, which charged Durov with aiding terrorist activity. The FSB alleges that a Telegram dating bot named "DaiVinchik" was used to recruit 46 individuals for attacks on police and arson, orchestrated by Ukrainian special services. The FSB also accuses Telegram's administration of failing to remove channels and bots used by Ukrainian intelligence and extremist groups. Durov is reportedly subject to an international arrest warrant. Inclusion on the Rosfinmonitoring list leads to significant restrictions: the freezing of Durov's bank accounts and assets, severe limitations on financial transactions, and a ban on election participation, media interaction, and event organization. Transfers to his accounts may be considered terrorism financing. For ordinary Russian Telegram users, purchasing Telegram Premium is not classified as financing terrorism, according to an IT expert. General use of the messenger—messaging, managing channels—does not automatically make a user a participant in extremist activity. There has been no official decision to ban Telegram itself. It is noted that French authorities are also investigating Durov over allegations of inadequate measures against criminal activity on the platform and insufficient cooperation with law enforcement. Durov denies all charges.

cryptonews.ru26m ago

Pavel Durov Designated as a Terrorist in Russia. What Does This Mean for Telegram Users?

cryptonews.ru26m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片