# Compliance Related Articles

HTX News Center provides the latest articles and in-depth analysis on "Compliance", covering market trends, project updates, tech developments, and regulatory policies in the crypto industry.

Three Years of 'Decentralization' Promises Unfulfilled: Is Base Still at a Standstill?

**Summary: "Three Years of 'Decentralization' Promises Unfulfilled – Has Base Stagnated?"** This article critically examines Coinbase's layer-2 blockchain, Base, arguing that its three-year promise of decentralization remains unfulfilled. Originally launched in 2023 with a roadmap towards decentralization, Base has consistently been rated at "Stage 0" (fully centralized) by industry monitors like L2Beat, indicating no meaningful decentralization progress. Key points include: * **Broken Promises:** Coinbase's 2023 and 2024 decentralization roadmaps and commitments, made in partnership with Optimism, have been largely abandoned without substantial progress. In 2026, Coinbase scrapped its original plan and consolidated all administrative control (via multi-signature wallets) under its own authority. * **Centralized Reality:** The article asserts Base is effectively a centralized, inefficient distributed database run by Coinbase employees, not a decentralized network. This was highlighted by two network outages in June 2026, where Coinbase directly modified code and rolled back the blockchain to fix issues. * **Regulatory and Legal Concerns:** The author raises significant questions about compliance. Base operates without mandatory KYC/AML checks, which may conflict with Coinbase's existing financial licenses that require such oversight. The prolonged lack of progress challenges the legitimacy of continued regulatory forbearance. * **Broader Industry Problem:** The stagnation is framed as part of a wider industry failure, where most Ethereum layer-2s have made slow or no progress toward the technically challenging "Stage 2" full decentralization envisioned by figures like Vitalik Buterin. In conclusion, the article posits that Base represents a case of "decentralization theater," where marketing and complex terminology obscure a centrally-controlled service that may be operating in a regulatory gray area for an unreasonably long period without delivering on its core promise.

marsbit3h ago

Three Years of 'Decentralization' Promises Unfulfilled: Is Base Still at a Standstill?

marsbit3h ago

Three-Year 'Decentralization' Promise Falls Flat, Is Base Still Stagnating?

Three years after its launch, Coinbase's Layer-2 solution Base has failed to deliver on its decentralization promises, remaining a centrally controlled "Stage 0" network, according to industry monitor L2Beat. The article argues Base functions as a tool for Coinbase to offer unregulated fund transfers, bypassing Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) checks. Coinbase initially published a decentralization roadmap in 2023, pledging collaboration with Optimism. However, progress stalled. By February 2026, Coinbase abandoned this plan, consolidating all administrative control via two multi-signature wallets. Network outages in June 2026, requiring Coinbase to manually roll back the chain, underscored its centralized nature. The piece criticizes Base as an inefficient, unstable distributed database—a solved technical problem for decades—that adds blockchain complexity without achieving decentralization. All development and operations are handled by Coinbase employees, making Base a Coinbase product. Key questions are raised: Did Coinbase ever have a viable decentralization plan? Is full decentralization for Layer-2s feasible in the short term? How long should regulators tolerate a platform operating without required financial licenses? The author contends that after 40 months with no real decentralization progress, continued regulatory leniency is unjustified, potentially constituting unlicensed money transmission.

Foresight News3h ago

Three-Year 'Decentralization' Promise Falls Flat, Is Base Still Stagnating?

Foresight News3h ago

One On-Chain Transfer Could Lead to 14 Years in Prison? UK Crypto Compliance Faces New Risks

A blockchain transfer could now lead to a 14-year prison sentence in the UK, following the designation of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) under the National Security Act 2023. A new criminal offense (Section 17C) makes it illegal for UK-linked persons or entities to obtain, receive, or retain any valuable benefit if they know, or should reasonably know, it originates from a designated entity like the IRGC. This applies broadly to crypto assets and on-chain transfers. The key challenge lies in timing and knowledge. A transfer can settle on-chain before the recipient identifies the sending wallet, and wallet attribution to a sanctioned entity may only occur post-transaction. Liability depends on what the recipient knew about the source of funds and when they knew it. The offense follows the value, not the payment path, and can involve indirect provision through intermediaries. While the designation itself doesn't trigger automatic asset freezes under UK sanctions law, it creates a separate criminal risk. For UK crypto exchanges, custodians, payment firms, and even users, this makes maintaining clear records of wallet attribution, transaction timelines, and subsequent actions critical for evidence. The law does not impose new reporting duties but emphasizes using existing suspicious activity reporting and consent processes. The lack of ability to reject on-chain transactions makes documented internal controls and decision-making timelines vital for legal defense.

marsbit4h ago

One On-Chain Transfer Could Lead to 14 Years in Prison? UK Crypto Compliance Faces New Risks

marsbit4h ago

活动图片