# Competition Related Articles

HTX News Center provides the latest articles and in-depth analysis on "Competition", covering market trends, project updates, tech developments, and regulatory policies in the crypto industry.

From OpenSea to OpenRouter: Is Alex Atallah Repeating His 'Exit at the Peak' Playbook?

From OpenSea to OpenRouter: Is Alex Atallah Repeating His "Exit at the Peak" Playbook? According to the Wall Street Journal, payments giant Stripe is in talks to acquire the AI model aggregation platform OpenRouter in a potential deal valuing the company near $100 billion. This would mark founder Alex Atallah's second creation of a company reaching a $100 billion valuation, following his co-founding of NFT marketplace OpenSea. OpenRouter, founded just over three years ago, has grown rapidly by acting as a unified gateway for developers to access over 400 AI models. It currently has about 10 million users and processes over 200 trillion tokens monthly. While the platform's annualized revenue is around $50 million, its valuation has skyrocketed from $1.3 billion in March 2026. The potential acquisition by Stripe, a company OpenRouter's founder once likened it to, represents a major expansion into AI infrastructure for the payments leader. This move echoes Atallah's previous timing with OpenSea, where he departed before the NFT market's significant downturn. For OpenRouter, selling now may be strategic. Despite its scale, its business model—charging a 5-5.5% fee on AI inference calls—faces pressure from competition, open-source models, and potential price wars among model providers, limiting its profitability narrative for an IPO. A key asset for potential acquirers like Stripe is OpenRouter's vast repository of real-world AI usage data, which offers unique insights into model performance and developer preferences that are difficult to replicate. Whether this potential deal signifies a new valuation benchmark for AI infrastructure or another market peak signal remains to be seen.

链捕手Yesterday 08:42

From OpenSea to OpenRouter: Is Alex Atallah Repeating His 'Exit at the Peak' Playbook?

链捕手Yesterday 08:42

4 Hours, 118 Responses: Liang Wenfeng’s Internal Q&A Addresses Everything

**DeepSeek Founder Liang Wenfeng's Candid Reflections on the Company's Path to AGI** DeepSeek has recently completed its first external funding round, raising over 500 billion RMB (approx. $74B) at a pre-money valuation of 3.675 trillion RMB ($543B). Founder Liang Wenfeng personally invested 200 billion RMB. This marks a strategic shift from its initial "no financing, no IPO, no commercialization" principle. In a recent investor Q&A, Liang articulated DeepSeek's core philosophy and roadmap. The company is driven by a powerful, unwritten vision for beneficial AGI rather than pure commercial maximization. He emphasizes "strategic restraint"—avoiding unnecessary conflicts, prioritizing long-term AGI success over short-term gains, and maintaining an open, cooperative stance even with competitors. Liang outlined the AGI technical roadmap: current focus on Agent capabilities, followed by solving "continual learning," which he sees as the key to unlocking models that can learn and adapt like humans. This could lead to a gradual "singularity" where AI accelerates its own research, and eventually to embodied intelligence. DeepSeek will strictly focus on this "AGI mainline," avoiding distractions like video generation which, while commercially viable, don't directly advance core intelligence. He identifies team stability as the single most critical factor for success, now bolstered by the recent funding. While talent is not a bottleneck, the primary constraint compared to the US is compute resources. Liang is optimistic about domestic AI chips, stating that Nvidia's CUDA moat is eroding and that within a year, the viability of the Chinese chip ecosystem will be proven, with Huawei's offerings being key. The main issue is production capacity. On competition, Liang believes the final differentiators will be cost, time-to-market, and user experience. He foresees Chinese companies playing a major role by offering systematically lower-cost AI services globally. DeepSeek's commercialization strategy involves offering API services at a "reasonable profit" and focusing on coding Agents. He remains committed to open-sourcing even their strongest models, seeing no downside as the barriers to effective deployment remain high. The company operates with a unique dual management structure combining top-down direction with significant bottom-up, unstructured research time for employees. Data quality and post-training are identified as major current challenges, with half of core researchers involved in data labeling efforts. Liang concludes that DeepSeek aims to be one of several trillion-dollar companies in the AI era, achieved through extreme focus on its chosen path.

链捕手Yesterday 06:24

4 Hours, 118 Responses: Liang Wenfeng’s Internal Q&A Addresses Everything

链捕手Yesterday 06:24

Base Under Pressure

**Title: The Pressure Mounts for Base** Base, the Ethereum Layer 2 scaling solution backed by Coinbase, is facing significant pressure and public scrutiny from its leadership following the launch of Robinhood Chain. Base co-founder Jesse Pollak recently acknowledged strategic missteps, admitting that the chain's past focus on social and creator tokens (e.g., through Farcaster, Zora) failed to deliver sustainable adoption. He has refocused on core infrastructure, handing leadership of the Base App back to Coinbase's Cobie. While Base remains a top L2 contender alongside OP Mainnet and Arbitrum, and boasts the highest TVL (nearly $12B), its weaknesses are being highlighted by the new competitor. Key criticisms include its slow progress on decentralization. Base has faced issues with its single sequencer causing block production halts, and L2BEAT is reportedly considering downgrading its decentralization rating from Stage 1 to Stage 0. This contrasts sharply with the rapid initial success of Robinhood Chain, whose DEX quickly entered the top five by volume. The leadership styles of the parent companies are also being compared: Robinhood's CEO actively engages with new projects, while a recent incident where Coinbase's Brian Armstrong briefly changed his profile picture—sparking and then crashing a related meme token—drew community ire and mockery. Pollak stated Base is working with Coinbase on tokenized stocks backed 1:1 by real equity, differentiating it from Robinhood's derivatives model. However, the article argues that Base's most urgent task is to address its long-standing technical and trust issues. With more traditional finance players likely to emulate Robinhood's path, Base must use this competitive pressure to solidify its position as long-term financial infrastructure.

Foresight News07/21 08:46

Base Under Pressure

Foresight News07/21 08:46

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

Circle's stock price has plunged approximately 76% from its 2023 peak, reflecting a major market revaluation. Despite this, Circle President Heath Tarbert emphasized the company's focus on long-term execution and its dominant position with USDC's $73 billion circulation across 34 blockchains. The competitive landscape is intensifying. A new consortium-backed stablecoin, Open USD, is attempting to challenge incumbents by sharing reserve yields with partners. More significantly, Visa's new stablecoin platform, initially supporting Open USD while also being compatible with USDC, could erode Circle's network effects. In response, Circle is expanding into real-world payments through partnerships like the one with Japan's JCB. Separately, Tether (USDT) faces a two-year compliance window under new U.S. regulations, requiring it to adjust its reserve composition away from assets like Bitcoin and loans towards cash and U.S. Treasuries. Meanwhile, in Hong Kong, Standard Chartered-backed fintech firm Dian Dian is poised to launch a licensed HKD-pegged stablecoin (HKDAP), moving the industry into a phase where the real test is integrating licensed stablecoins into actual payment flows and corporate treasury systems. The sharp decline in Circle's stock underscores a broader shift: the stablecoin market is moving from a winner-takes-all dynamic to a multi-player competitive arena where execution, compliance, and real-world utility are becoming paramount.

marsbit07/21 07:08

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

marsbit07/21 07:08

Should Developers Build on Corporate Blockchains Like Base and Robinhood?

Should developers build on enterprise-backed public chains like Base, Robinhood, or Stripe's Tempo? While these chains offer enticing benefits—primarily access to the platform's existing user base for accelerated growth—they come with significant, well-documented risks stemming from the inherent conflict of interest when a company controls both the underlying chain and major on-chain applications. The core promise is traffic distribution: projects gain exposure through platforms like the Coinbase wallet or app. However, this model creates five major risks: 1. **Direct Competition**: The platform can leverage its data and position to launch and prioritize its own competing products, similar to Amazon creating private-label goods or Microsoft bundling Internet Explorer. 2. **Wallet Agnosticism**: Companion wallets (e.g., Coinbase Wallet) must support multiple chains and integrate top applications across the ecosystem to remain competitive, diluting the promised exclusive traffic advantage for the enterprise chain. 3. **Competitor Exclusion**: Rival platforms (e.g., Coinbase vs. Robinhood) have no incentive to promote applications built on a competitor's chain. 4. **Profit Extraction**: The party controlling end-users holds disproportionate bargaining power and can capture most of the value, squeezing protocol profits down to marginal cost. 5. **Unfulfilled Promises**: Promised traffic support can be deprioritized or withdrawn based on shifting corporate strategies. In contrast, neutral chains like Ethereum or Solana avoid these platform risks entirely. For developers considering enterprise chains, risk mitigation strategies include: evaluating substantial onboarding grants, seeking (though often weak) contractual guarantees, and, most crucially, pursuing a multi-chain strategy while building independent user acquisition channels. Enterprise chains may be useful for initial cold-start growth, but the ultimate goal should be cultivating a dedicated user base rather than long-term dependence on a single, conflicted platform.

marsbit07/21 02:00

Should Developers Build on Corporate Blockchains Like Base and Robinhood?

marsbit07/21 02:00

Visa Joins the Stablecoin Arena: Not to Eliminate Stablecoins, but to 'Collect Rent' from Them

Visa is entering the stablecoin arena by launching a stablecoin platform, aiming not to eliminate existing stablecoins but to facilitate and profit from their broader adoption. The platform will enable banks, financial institutions, and fintech companies to more easily issue, manage, and integrate stablecoins into Visa's existing global payment network, which spans over 200 million merchants and 15,000 financial institutions. This move is expected to expand the overall stablecoin market by creating more use cases. For USDC (Circle), it presents a short-term benefit due to likely direct integration and its compliance advantages, though long-term competition may increase from bank-issued or consortium stablecoins. For USDT (Tether), the impact could be more significant in traditional payment and settlement areas, as Visa's platform may favor more transparent, compliant options, though USDT is expected to remain strong in pure crypto trading contexts. Regarding Ethereum, Visa's initiative is seen as neutral to slightly positive. It could drive more traditional capital into the Ethereum ecosystem in the form of stablecoins, increasing network activity and demand for Ethereum as a settlement layer, especially with Layer-2 scaling solutions. While the platform will support multiple blockchains, Ethereum's maturity and decentralization make it a likely primary choice for compliant stablecoins. In essence, Visa's strategy is to embrace stablecoins, collect fees from increased transaction volume on its network, and grow the overall market, rather than displace major incumbents like USDC and USDT directly.

marsbit07/21 00:54

Visa Joins the Stablecoin Arena: Not to Eliminate Stablecoins, but to 'Collect Rent' from Them

marsbit07/21 00:54

活动图片