Coldcard hackers transfer 64 BTC and 200 ETH to cryptocurrency mixers

cointelegraphPublished on 2026-08-06Last updated on 2026-08-06

Abstract

Blockchain security firm CertiK reports that approximately 64 Bitcoin ($4.17 million) and 200 Ether ($380,000) linked to the Coldcard exploit were sent to cryptocurrency mixers Wasabi Wallet and Tornado Cash, respectively, this week. These protocols obscure the on-chain trail of stolen funds. The Coldcard attack, now 2026's third-largest crypto hack, drained at least $100 million in Bitcoin from 7,300 wallets, with total losses potentially reaching $130 million. Analysis from TRM Labs and Galaxy Digital suggests multiple attackers, including copycats, exploited a 2021 firmware bug that weakened wallet seed randomness. While some stolen assets have been moved to mixers, most victim funds reportedly remain in attacker-controlled addresses.

About 64 Bitcoin, worth $4.17 million, and 200 Ether, worth $380,000, linked to the recent Coldcard exploit were sent to cryptocurrency mixing protocols, according to blockchain security platform CertiK.

The Bitcoin transfer was from address bc1q0 to crypto mixing protocol Wasabi on Tuesday, according to blockchain data shared by CertiK.

“We think it might be a smaller exploiter. There’s likely a few copycats after the initial exploit,” a CertiK spokesperson told Cointelegraph. The 200 Ether (ETH) was transferred to Tornado Cash on Wednesday, according to CertiK’s X post.

Crypto mixing protocols such as Tornado Cash typically pool and then scramble the cryptocurrency from multiple users, breaking the publicly traceable onchain link between senders and recipients. This makes it difficult to trace the stolen funds, decreasing the chances of asset recovery.

In April, the hacker behind a $293 million Kelp DAO hack laundered about 75,700 Ether, then worth $175 million, primarily through THORChain, generating about $910,000 in fee revenue for the protocol. The attacker also used the Umbra privacy protocol.

The Coldcard exploit has now become the third-largest cryptocurrency hack so far in 2026. It drained at least $100 million in Bitcoin across three confirmed attack waves from 7,300 victim wallets, according to Galaxy Digital. The company also identified a suspected fourth wave that could bring total losses to about $130 million in BTC.

Source: CertiK

Most copycats haven’t moved stolen funds

Onchain tracing by TRM Labs showed that the majority of victim funds were still pooled in a small number of attacker-controlled addresses with limited mixing attempts, according to a Thursday report.

The blockchain intelligence company said that the “differences in transaction construction” during each attack wave hint at multiple attackers behind the exploit.

The analysis is in line with Galaxy’s previous findings that showed at least 15 different attackers who exploited the Coldcard vulnerability.

Related: AI has not triggered DeFi ‘hackpocalypse,’ Dragonfly partner says

TRM Labs said that a firmware bug from March 2021 weakened seed randomness on some Coldcard wallets, cutting key strength to 40 bits from 128 bits, making it “brute-forceable without physical access.”

Dragonfly managing partner Haseeb Qureshi wrote that roughly “$2 of AI hardening” could have prevented the Coldcard exploit, citing social media reports that some AI models rediscovered the vulnerability that led to the attack in less than 20 minutes.

Magazine: Does Botanix’s failure prove Bitcoiners don’t care about DeFi?

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, what specific actions did the hackers linked to the Coldcard exploit take with the stolen Bitcoin and Ethereum?

AThe hackers transferred about 64 Bitcoin (worth $4.17 million) to the Wasabi mixing protocol and 200 Ether (worth $380,000) to the Tornado Cash mixing protocol to obscure the funds' origins and hinder traceability.

QWhat is a primary reason criminals use cryptocurrency mixing protocols like Tornado Cash, as explained in the article?

ACryptocurrency mixing protocols pool and scramble funds from multiple users, breaking the publicly traceable on-chain link between senders and recipients. This makes it difficult to trace stolen funds and decreases the chances of asset recovery.

QWhat key vulnerability in Coldcard wallets did TRM Labs identify as the root cause of the exploit?

ATRM Labs identified a firmware bug from March 2021 that weakened seed randomness on some Coldcard wallets, cutting key strength to 40 bits from 128 bits. This made the wallets "brute-forceable without physical access."

QWhat evidence suggests there were multiple attackers involved in the Coldcard exploit?

ATRM Labs noted "differences in transaction construction" during each attack wave, hinting at multiple attackers. This aligns with Galaxy Digital's previous findings that identified at least 15 different attackers who exploited the vulnerability.

QHow significant is the Coldcard exploit in terms of financial losses for 2026, and what was a notable point about where most of the stolen funds are currently held?

AThe Coldcard exploit is the third-largest cryptocurrency hack of 2026 so far, with total losses estimated at around $130 million in BTC. Notably, a Thursday report indicated that the majority of victim funds were still pooled in a small number of attacker-controlled addresses, with limited mixing attempts.

Related Reads

Home Furnishing Listed Companies Are Trying to Turn Around with AI and Semiconductors

Chinese home furnishing listed companies are increasingly turning to AI and semiconductor cross-border ventures to revive their fortunes amid declining core businesses. A prominent example is PVC flooring giant **Elegant Home Furnishing**, whose stock price skyrocketed with 10 consecutive trading limits after announcing a plan to acquire a majority stake in **Ou Kang Nuo**, a semiconductor storage testing equipment and services company. Despite Elegant Home's own financial struggles—including recent losses and tight cash flow—the acquisition, funded through asset sales and loans, has dramatically boosted its market value. The deal involves a cross-shareholding structure with Ou Kang Nuo's controlling shareholder. This trend is widespread. Over the past year, numerous home furnishing firms with stagnant main operations have seen their stock prices surge after announcing moves into hot sectors like AI, semiconductors, or computing power. Key cases include: * **Markor Home Furnishings** ("high-end home furnishing first share"), after years of heavy losses, acquired an AI server high-speed copper cable company and later introduced AI computing power investors. * **Zhenai Meijia** ("blanket king") became the first A-listed manufacturer controlled by an AI large model company following a takeover. * **Fasilon** (integrated ceiling) saw its stock soar after establishing an AI subsidiary. * **Jinlong Decoration** experienced multiple trading limits after being linked to "commercial aerospace" and "AI computing," despite clarifying these segments contribute less than 1% of its business. Statistics show over 20 A-share companies announced semiconductor crossovers in 2025, with home furnishing and building materials firms being the most active. This shift is largely driven by pressures from the real estate downturn, shrinking overseas demand, and trade tariffs, pushing companies to seek growth through trendy concepts rather than core business improvement. However, the article warns that such speculative frenzies often end when the hype fades, leaving stock prices to eventually reflect the companies' weak fundamentals, as seen in Jinlong Decoration's subsequent sharp price correction. The repeated attempts to "ride the trend" highlight a desperate struggle for survival in a challenging traditional industry.

marsbit15m ago

Home Furnishing Listed Companies Are Trying to Turn Around with AI and Semiconductors

marsbit15m ago

"Sell America" Trade Resurfaces: Global Funds Reprice Washington Policy Risks, Dollar and Treasuries Bear the Brunt

"Sale of America" Trade Resurges as Global Funds Reprice Washington Policy Risks, Hitting Dollar and Treasuries First Recent policy signals from Washington are prompting global bond and foreign exchange investors to reignite the "Sale of America" debate. Uncertainty stems from Fed Chair Wash's shift towards less policy communication, Treasury Secretary Bessant's approval of joint intervention with Japan to support the Yen (the first such coordinated move in nearly 30 years), expanding fiscal deficits, and trade war fears. These factors are undermining confidence in U.S. assets. The 30-year Treasury yield recently broke above 5%, hitting a high not seen since 2007, while the Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index has fallen about 2% from its June peak. This dollar weakness is unusual given still-high U.S. interest rates. Investors cite policy uncertainty as a key driver, with one manager calling the Fed Chair and Treasury Secretary a "double whammy" creating a "Trump administration premium." While the S&P 500 continues hitting record highs and foreign holdings of U.S. Treasuries remain high, parts of the bond and FX markets are adjusting. A core concern is whether the Fed under Wash can effectively anchor inflation expectations; analysts warn that if the Fed lags the hiking cycle, long-end yields could face further upward pressure. The 30-year term premium has risen sharply. The U.S.-backed Yen intervention has also sparked debate on the dollar's structural outlook. While framed by Bessant as a "reallocation of reserves," market participants caution that if Japan—America's largest foreign creditor—must sell Treasuries to fund interventions, ripple effects could hit the bond market. Strategists predict moderate dollar depreciation ahead. Most experts are not predicting an end to dollar hegemony or the safe-haven status of Treasuries. However, a key underlying risk is highlighted: the pace of foreign buying of U.S. debt may not keep up with the speed of American borrowing, gradually eroding the structural advantages that have long supported "American exceptionalism."

marsbit16m ago

"Sell America" Trade Resurfaces: Global Funds Reprice Washington Policy Risks, Dollar and Treasuries Bear the Brunt

marsbit16m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

1.5k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片