Coldcard Hacker Moves 45% of Stolen Bitcoin Through THORChain

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-09-07Last updated on 2026-09-07

Abstract

The hacker behind the third wave of attacks on the Coldcard wallet has accelerated the movement of stolen funds, transferring roughly 45% of the Bitcoin stolen in that wave. According to Galaxy Research, the perpetrator is using methods like THORChain to move Bitcoin to Ethereum and CoinJoin transactions to obscure the trail on the blockchain. The attacker opened 293 two-of-two multisignature vaults with the stolen Bitcoin and has begun draining the largest ones. While this activity has revealed new transaction patterns, the majority (82%) of all Bitcoin stolen across all Coldcard attack waves remains unmoved in the initial addresses. The third wave attack is part of one of 2026's largest crypto exploits, ranking third in reported losses. The incident highlights how stolen cryptocurrency can be laundered across different blockchain ecosystems.

The perpetrator of the third wave attack against the Coldcard wallet has escalated the pace of transferring funds, reports Galaxy Research. The exploiters have transferred approximately 45% of the Bitcoin stolen from the third wave so far. These transfers indicate a pattern of using methods that make blockchain tracking difficult.

The perpetrator moved Bitcoin to Ethereum through THORChain on September 2. Recent transactions involved moving Bitcoin via CoinJoin rounds. CoinJoin is a process whereby payments from different users are included in a transaction. This makes it more difficult to track transactions of individual fund transfers on the Bitcoin blockchain. It now provides researchers with insight into how the attacker operates the stolen funds.

Two-of-Two Multisignature Vaults Indicate Attack Plan

According to Galaxy, the third-wave attacker opened 293 multisignature two-of-two vaults. These were vaults with Bitcoin stolen from Coldcard victims. So far, the funds have been transferred from the biggest vaults in decreasing order of their sizes. According to Galaxy, funds from the 11 biggest vaults have already been transferred.

This information allowed researchers to track down some of the transactions linked to the exploit. They managed to find an unknown multisignature vault, which had most probably been used for transferring stolen Bitcoins from another victim. However, Galaxy was unable to determine the circumstances of this new theft. It means that the extent of the attack has expanded, but no new confirmed loss is known yet.

Bulk of the Stolen Bitcoin is Yet Unmoved

Even with all of the recent activities, the bulk of the Bitcoin stolen in all Coldcard attack waves remains in the initial attack-controlled addresses. According to Galaxy, 82% of Bitcoin stolen in all Coldcard attacks still lies in those addresses. The remaining 18% has since been transferred in transactions indicative of laundering.

The third wave is, therefore, a big portion of the active fund movement activity. It provides investigators with yet another pattern of transactions for monitoring. The Coldcard exploit is one of the biggest cryptocurrency exploits documented within the year 2026. According to DefiLlama, it is the third-biggest exploit of the year with reported losses. The Kelp DAO hack is ranked first with reported losses of approximately $293 million. In second place is the Drift Protocol exploit, which incurred about $280 million in losses.

This particular exploit reveals how stolen cryptocurrency can be moved through various blockchain ecosystems like THORChain and CoinJoin. The transactions present yet another piece of evidence for investigators and market players to track down.

Highlighted Crypto News:
South Korea’s Hanwha Advances Tokenized Securities With Avalanche Platform as Regulations Evolve

TagsBitcoinBitcoin (BTCBitcoin (BTC)BlockchainBTCCold WalletGalaxy

Related Questions

QAccording to Galaxy Research, what percentage of the Bitcoin stolen in the Coldcard third-wave attack has been moved so far?

AAccording to Galaxy Research, approximately 45% of the Bitcoin stolen from the third wave has been transferred so far.

QWhat two primary methods did the attacker use to move the stolen Bitcoin, making it difficult to track?

AThe attacker used THORChain to move Bitcoin to Ethereum and employed CoinJoin rounds to mix the transactions, both of which make blockchain tracking difficult.

QWhat did the discovery of 293 multisignature two-of-two vaults indicate about the attacker's plan?

AThe discovery of 293 multisignature two-of-two vaults indicated a structured attack plan, with funds being transferred from the largest vaults first in descending order of size.

QWhat overall percentage of Bitcoin stolen from *all* Coldcard attack waves remains in the initial attacker-controlled addresses?

AAccording to Galaxy, 82% of the Bitcoin stolen in all Coldcard attack waves remains in the initial attacker-controlled addresses.

QHow does the Coldcard exploit rank among the biggest cryptocurrency exploits of 2026 according to DefiLlama?

AAccording to DefiLlama, the Coldcard exploit is ranked as the third-biggest cryptocurrency exploit of 2026, following the Kelp DAO hack (first) and the Drift Protocol exploit (second).

Related Reads

MIT Professor Despairs: OpenAI's Solution to Millennium Problem Is Beyond Human Comprehension

MIT professor expresses despair as AI solves a Millennium Prize Problem with proof humans struggle to comprehend. OpenAI reportedly published 722 papers tackling long-standing mathematical challenges, including the Navier-Stokes equations, a fundamental problem in fluid dynamics concerning whether smooth solutions can become turbulent ("blow up"). While a Spanish mathematical team had largely constructed the framework, OpenAI's model allegedly completed the final, extremely complex 1%, producing a valid proof. The breakthrough, however, has triggered profound anxiety. Experts, including MIT's Justin Solomon, find the proof dense, technically overwhelming, and lacking the intuitive elegance of human-derived mathematics. This represents an unprecedented split between "truth" and "human understanding," challenging centuries of scientific tradition. The incident highlights broader concerns about AI's role in science. Fields Medalist Terence Tao proposed a thought experiment: would we use an AI-generated, 100% effective cancer drug if no human could understand *why* it works? This underscores critical issues in AI alignment, explainability, and verification. Furthermore, the academic system is buckling under an AI-generated deluge of papers, making peer review nearly impossible. There are fears that future scientific breakthroughs will depend more on computational resources (GPUs, tokens) than human insight, potentially marginalizing traditional researchers. Despite AI's brute-force prowess within the "convex hull" of existing knowledge, Solomon argues that truly original, paradigm-shifting concepts likely still require human creativity. In an era where generating answers is cheap but verification and deep understanding are not, foundational education in mathematics and critical thinking remains essential. Humans may transition from being primary solvers to becoming the essential interpreters and validators of AI-discovered truths.

marsbit48m ago

MIT Professor Despairs: OpenAI's Solution to Millennium Problem Is Beyond Human Comprehension

marsbit48m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片