Altcoin Network Hacked, Putting Three Days of Transactions at Risk! Exchanges Halt Trading!

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-11Last updated on 2026-08-11

Abstract

The Ravencoin (RVN) network, a Proof-of-Work altcoin, has been hacked due to a critical consensus vulnerability. Attackers created invalid blocks, with the first known one appearing on August 7, 2026. This could force a deep blockchain reorganization, potentially rolling back transactions from up to three days. Major mining pools have started mining an alternative chain to exclude the hacked branch. If this chain becomes dominant, it could revert the network to its pre-August 7 state, risking the reversal of exchange deposits and withdrawals. The Ravencoin team has advised exchanges to temporarily halt RVN deposits and withdrawals. Exchanges like Bithumb and Upbit have suspended RVN transactions and issued warnings. Following the news, the price of RVN dropped approximately 20%.

Amid ongoing hacker attacks in the cryptocurrency market, hackers have this time targeted Ravencoin ($RVN), an altcoin based on the Proof-of-Work algorithm.

In this instance, hackers created invalid blocks in the Ravencoin ($RVN) network. The Ravencoin team confirmed the hack, explaining that a critical consensus vulnerability in the network was exploited, causing some nodes to accept invalid blocks.

Although the attackers managed to create invalid blocks using the vulnerability they discovered, the first known invalid block in the network, according to an official Ravencoin statement, appeared on August 7, 2026, at 15:44:01 UTC and had a height of 4,487,776.

This negative development raised concerns that the network might face a blockchain reorganization so deep that transactions from approximately the last three days would need to be reversed.

According to the statement, mining pools 2Miners and RavenMiner currently control the majority of the network's hash rate and have begun mining on an alternate chain, excluding the hacked branch, starting from block height 4,487,776. If the miners, who are said to dominate the network, decide to let this alternate chain become dominant, the chain could be rolled back four days, returning to a state prior to August 7, the date the attack began.

Such a large-scale reorganization could mean removing certain transactions from the blockchain's history and re-executing them. This, consequently, poses a significant risk, especially for exchange deposit and withdrawal operations.

Therefore, the Ravencoin team recommended that exchanges temporarily suspend $RVN deposits and withdrawals until the network stabilizes.

The project also reported that transactions confirmed after block number 4,487,775 should be considered risky.

Consequently, exchanges such as Bithumb and Upbit have temporarily suspended $RVN deposit and withdrawal operations. They also stated that $RVN received a warning.

The vulnerability in the network's security system and the potential reorganization risk directly impacted the price of $RVN. The price of Ravencoin fell by approximately 20% within minutes of the news spreading.

*This is not investment advice.

end-content

Related Questions

QWhich specific altcoin network was targeted by hackers according to the article?

AThe Ravencoin (RVN) network, an altcoin based on the Proof-of-Work algorithm, was targeted by hackers.

QWhat was the core issue that allowed the hack on the Ravencoin network to happen?

AThe hack was possible due to a critical consensus vulnerability in the Ravencoin network, which caused some nodes to accept invalid blocks created by the attackers.

QWhat potential consequence does the article mention regarding blockchain history?

AThe article mentions the potential for a deep blockchain reorganization (reorg), which could require rolling back transactions from approximately the last three days, effectively removing and re-executing them.

QWhat action did the Ravencoin team recommend for cryptocurrency exchanges?

AThe Ravencoin team recommended that exchanges temporarily suspend RVN deposits and withdrawals until the network stabilizes.

QWhat immediate market impact did the news of the hack have on the price of RVN?

AThe price of Ravencoin (RVN) dropped by approximately 20% within minutes after the news of the hack spread.

Related Reads

AI Redefines What Makes a Good Teacher

AI is redefining the role of the good teacher. While AI adoption in Chinese K-12 education is widespread—reducing new teachers' lesson prep time by over 60%—it has not replaced teachers. Instead, it amplifies the need for their human judgment and presence. Research highlights a critical shift: AI excels at elevating a student's initial 30-point idea to a 70-point answer, but it risks eliminating the crucial 20-point journey of deep, personal learning from 70 to 90. A study from the University of Pennsylvania showed students using an unfettered AI as a "crutch" performed worse on subsequent tests than those using a teacher-guided "guardrailed" AI or a control group. AI efficiently handles standardized tasks like lesson planning, grading, and personalized assignments, making differentiated instruction scalable. However, it cannot replicate the "collective teacher efficacy"—the shared belief among educators that they can impact students—which research identifies as the top factor influencing student achievement. The new benchmark for teachers involves three levels of AI literacy: verifying AI output, directing AI to complete tasks, and, most critically, redesigning courses and pedagogy with AI. Currently, most training stops at the second level. The gap is widening between "super teachers," who use saved time for deeper student engagement, and those who risk "metacognitive laziness" by over-relying on AI without critical oversight. Ultimately, AI makes affordable, one-on-one tutoring possible, fulfilling a long-standing educational challenge. Yet, the Penn study underscores that access alone is insufficient. Effective learning still requires a teacher to guide when to intervene and when to step back, ensuring students earn the final, transformative 20 points of their intellectual growth.

marsbit2m ago

AI Redefines What Makes a Good Teacher

marsbit2m ago

Kotlin 'J God' Two-Hour Controversial Interview: I'd Rather Lose 80% of Job Opportunities Than Use AI for Programming

Jake Wharton, a prominent Android and Kotlin developer known as "J God," has taken a strong stance against using AI for programming. He publicly stated that he will not join AI companies, work on AI-centric products, or accept roles that mandate AI tool usage, a condition he estimates eliminates 80% of potential job opportunities for him. Wharton values stable cash compensation and the freedom to choose his employer over the potentially higher, riskier rewards of trending tech sectors like AI and cryptocurrency, which he views critically. In a recent two-hour interview, Wharton explained his skepticism. He argues that the push for AI in software development is often driven top-down by management, bypassing engineering judgment, unlike the traditional bottom-up adoption of new tools by developers. He has never used an AI agent to write code, believing the most irresponsible use is generating code beyond a developer's understanding, which can lead to unmaintainable software and erode an engineer's core skills and bargaining power. While he acknowledges AI as a potentially useful tool in the toolbox, he firmly opposes making it the foundation of the engineering process. Wharton also discussed Kotlin's evolution, describing it as "what Java wanted to be 10 years later." He highlighted its advantages, such as built-in null safety, and its success in becoming a default for Android development. However, he noted that merely knowing Kotlin is no longer a distinct career advantage due to its widespread adoption. He expressed admiration for languages like Swift and Rust, particularly Rust's approach to ownership and error handling. Having left large companies like Google and Cash App, Wharton now prefers working in small, focused teams. He recently joined Skylight, a company that aligns with his values of open-source contribution and restrained, non-core use of AI. Wharton remains unconvinced that AI will replace programmers, emphasizing that software creation and maintenance require human understanding and that AI-generated code still needs expert review and debugging.

marsbit6m ago

Kotlin 'J God' Two-Hour Controversial Interview: I'd Rather Lose 80% of Job Opportunities Than Use AI for Programming

marsbit6m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片