Company Strategy Again Declines to Purchase BTC, Pays $139 Million to Repurchase Its Own STRC Shares

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-09-14Last updated on 2026-09-14

Abstract

For the third consecutive week, Strategy (ticker: MSTR) has abstained from purchasing Bitcoin. Instead, the company, led by Michael Saylor, directed $139.3 million towards buying back its own Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (STRC) between September 8-13. This follows a prior $176.3 million STRC buyback the week before. The company's total Bitcoin holdings remain unchanged at 845,050 BTC, last acquired on August 31 for nearly $370 million. Strategy prioritizes repurchasing STRC shares below their $100 liquidation preference, viewing it as accretive by canceling future dividend obligations. The buyback was funded from the company's more flexible U.S. dollar cash reserves, which totaled $1.30 billion as of September 13, separate from $5.10 billion reserved for dividends and debt. The company's board recently doubled the authorized limit for its digital asset securities repurchase program to $2 billion. Strategy has not sold any Bitcoin or common MSTR stock. Saylor noted the STRC "Bitcoin-backed loan" carries a 57 basis point credit spread, based on specific Bitcoin price and volatility assumptions. MSTR remains the largest corporate Bitcoin holder globally.

According to the company's Form 8-K report, it has now been three consecutive weeks since its last Bitcoin purchase. Instead, as per a document filed with the SEC on September 14 covering the previous week, the company acquired STRC preferred shares worth $139.3 million.

Strategy's Bitcoin holdings remain unchanged at 845,050 $BTC since the last acquisition of nearly $370 million worth of Bitcoin on August 31. Prior to that, the company had not purchased $BTC for 10 consecutive weeks.

Strategy Opts for Share Buyback Over Bitcoin Purchase

Michael Saylor-led Bitcoin continues to allocate cash to bring its STRC preferred shares back to their par value of $100. In the report filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on September 14, covering the period from September 8 to 13, Strategy repurchased 1,420,467 STRC shares.

According to Google Finance, STRC shares are trading at $98.64, below the $100 target price that the company considers its par value. Management views share purchases below $100 as profitable, as repurchasing shares at a discount eliminates future dividend payments the company would otherwise have to make.

STRC holds higher priority compared to MSTR common shares and is positioned as a short-term "digital credit," backed by the company's cash and Bitcoin, though without direct ownership of the coins themselves.

Notably, the company has not sold any Bitcoin or anything else as part of its equity market program. For two consecutive weeks now, Strategy has not touched its MSTR common shares.

Bitcoin Treasuries, by company Strategy Bitcoin holdings, acquired

The latest STRC purchase was funded from Strategy's U.S. dollar cash pool, which is the more flexible of the company's two dollar reserves. As of September 13:

  • U.S. reserves designated for preferred stock dividends and debt interest payments total $5.10 billion
  • $1.30 billion in general U.S. Cash

Share Buybacks Becoming a Pattern

As Cryptopolitan reported last week, Strategy spent $176.3 million on 1,810,885 STRC shares, after which it was announced that the board of directors had approved doubling the ceiling of the digital credit security buyback program to $2 billion.

According to documents, after the latest funding round, $1.05 billion remains available for repurchasing preferred shares and $1.0 billion for repurchasing MSTR common shares.

On September 14, Saylor published on the company's credit risk dashboard information indicating that the "$BTC credit" for STRC is 57 basis points, with a dollar duration of 3.9 years, based on assumptions of a 10% annual Bitcoin return, 40% volatility, and a Bitcoin price of $77,266.

According to Google Finance, MSTR's closing price was $130.97. Strategy still leads the Bitcoin Treasuries ranking, which includes 197 public companies accumulating Bitcoin in one form or another, ahead of Twenty One Capital, Metaplanet, and MARA Holdings.

end-content

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, what has MicroStrategy chosen to do instead of buying more Bitcoin for the third consecutive week?

AMicroStrategy has chosen to spend its cash on repurchasing its own Series A preferred stock (STRC), specifically buying $139.3 million worth of STRC shares.

QHow much Bitcoin does MicroStrategy hold according to the latest report mentioned in the article, and since when has this amount remained unchanged?

AMicroStrategy holds 845,050 Bitcoin. This amount has remained unchanged since its last purchase of nearly $370 million worth of Bitcoin on August 31.

QWhat are the two components of MicroStrategy's US dollar reserves as of September 13, according to the filing?

AAs of September 13, MicroStrategy's US dollar reserves consist of: 1) $5.10 billion for dividend and debt payments, and 2) $1.30 billion in flexible cash.

QWhat is the target price that MicroStrategy considers as the par value for its STRC preferred shares, and what is the current trading price according to Google Finance?

AMicroStrategy considers $100 as the par value for its STRC preferred shares. According to Google Finance, the shares were trading at $98.64.

QHow much funding remains available for stock repurchases under the company's current programs after recent activities?

AAfter the latest funding round, $1.05 billion remains available for repurchasing STRC preferred shares, and $1.0 billion remains for repurchasing common MSTR shares.

Related Reads

Claude Forms Teams to Hunt Bugs! 66 Bugs Found in 116K Lines of Code, Single Agent Maxed Out at 27

Claude Managed Agents, Anthropic's new multi-agent workflow system, significantly outperformed a single AI agent in finding bugs. In a test with 70 bugs hidden across 116,000 lines of code, a single Claude agent found a maximum of 27 bugs. When Claude was tasked with organizing a team of agents itself via the dynamic workflow, it consistently found 66 bugs across three runs. This capability is part of two major updates: "Claude Managed Agents" for developers to integrate multi-agent coordination into their apps, and an expanded beta for "Claude Code Projects," which lets users manage complex tasks in a single conversation, with Claude breaking down work and coordinating parallel threads. The Managed Agents feature allows a primary Claude agent to receive a task, automatically write a workflow program to divide labor among specialized sub-agents, and coordinate their execution and results aggregation. For example, it can orchestrate checking 300 contracts for specific clauses, using multiple agents for parallel reading and verification. The system supports workflows with up to 1000 cumulative agents per run. While this multi-agent approach improves task coverage and results, Anthropic notes that costs and efficiency gains need careful evaluation. Projects use existing plan credits, while Managed Agents incur token usage fees plus a $0.08 per hour runtime fee per active session. The key challenge is whether offloading coordination to Claude leads to faster, more reliable outcomes with less human oversight.

marsbit1h ago

Claude Forms Teams to Hunt Bugs! 66 Bugs Found in 116K Lines of Code, Single Agent Maxed Out at 27

marsbit1h ago

Terence Tao's Blog Explodes on Hot Search! 250,000 Math PhDs on the Brink, Must Slow Down AI

Mathematician Terence Tao's blog post ignited a fierce online debate after a video of him warning "we must slow down AI" went viral. He described AI's progress as an "extremely nonlinear dynamic" pursued with unclear consequences. This warning came just days after he promoted a project for open-source AI mathematical models, highlighting a profound tension. The core crisis, explored in a guest post by 3Blue1Brown creator Grant Sanderson, is AI's threat to traditional mathematics. Automated theorem provers combined with large language models can generate proofs at superhuman speeds, potentially rendering the human role of "proving theorems" obsolete. Sanderson argues that the true goal of mathematics is not proof-generation but the advancement of *human understanding*. As AI masters the former, the academic value of proof alone is diminished. Sanderson proposes a paradigm shift: elevating "motivational explanation" over mere proof. Unlike a formal proof, a motivational explanation guides readers through the intuitive reasoning, historical context, and conceptual connections behind a result—the "why" and "how" of discovery. To institutionalize this, he suggests creating "open explanation problems," reforming PhD defenses to prioritize clear exposition, and valuing pedagogical work as highly as journal publications in tenure reviews. The debate drew reactions across academia. Some physicists welcomed mathematicians to a world long prioritizing understanding over rigorous proof. Critics worried this shift could disadvantage brilliant but inarticulate problem-solvers. Others questioned if AI will eventually master explanation too. Supporters countered that the goal is fostering *human* comprehension, which is inherently subjective and interactive. The article concludes that AI's rise presents both a crisis and an opportunity. Without adapting academic culture and reward systems, human mathematicians risk irrelevance. However, by embracing their unique role as architects of understanding and interpreters of AI-generated knowledge, they can steer mathematics toward a new renaissance focused on human insight and clarity.

marsbit3h ago

Terence Tao's Blog Explodes on Hot Search! 250,000 Math PhDs on the Brink, Must Slow Down AI

marsbit3h ago

The "Number Game" Behind Trillion-Dollar Valuations: OpenAI and Anthropic's Revenue Can't Be Compared Directly

"Valuation Game in Trillions: The 'Digital Metrics Play' Behind OpenAI and Anthropic's Incomparable Revenues" Investors face significant uncertainty as core financial metrics from the two AI giants, OpenAI and Anthropic, cannot be compared directly due to differing accounting methods. OpenAI projects its annualized revenue run rate (ARR) to reach or exceed $70 billion by year-end, while Anthropic announced in July that its ARR had hit $65 billion. However, a key discrepancy renders these figures incomparable: Anthropic records the total sales value generated through cloud partners like Amazon as revenue, whereas OpenAI only counts its net share from partners like Microsoft. This reporting difference has tangible market impact. A recent tech stock downturn was partly attributed to investor attempts to adjust OpenAI's numbers for a direct comparison, leading to lower estimates and concerns about its growth pace. Currently, OpenAI's ARR is reportedly around $50 billion, with expectations to approach $70 billion by December. The issue highlights broader concerns about ARR as a non-standardized, often manipulated metric used to showcase growth and justify high private valuations. It is calculated by extrapolating short-term performance or summing contract values, offering companies considerable discretion. A significant gap exists between ARR and actual recognized annual revenue: OpenAI expects 2026 revenue of roughly $35 billion (half its year-end ARR projection), and internal documents show Anthropic's 2025 revenue was about $4.6 billion against a published ARR exceeding $9 billion. Experts warn that the opacity surrounding these key players creates a "black box" effect, complicating investment decisions and amplifying market volatility. As their performance is a bellwether for the AI investment narrative, any signs of slowing sales growth could ripple through the broader market, affecting chipmakers and other beneficiaries of the AI boom. The reliance on ARR sidesteps a fundamental question: the scale of real sales needed to justify trillion-dollar valuations and cover massive expenditures. The situation may improve with greater transparency, particularly if Anthropic proceeds with its anticipated Wall Street debut, which would subject the company to standardized GAAP financial reporting.

marsbit6h ago

The "Number Game" Behind Trillion-Dollar Valuations: OpenAI and Anthropic's Revenue Can't Be Compared Directly

marsbit6h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

3.5k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片