DOGE 盘整终结?沉睡数月后,牛市信号初现!

金色财经Published on 2025-10-10Last updated on 2025-12-09

Abstract

市场似乎已在为这个 meme 币的再次“飞翔”酝酿条件,只待宏观东风的到来。

尽管狗狗币价格已在0.24美元附近横盘整理数月,看似波澜不惊,但一项深入的技术分析指出,这种 meme 加密货币可能正处于新一轮爆发性上涨的前夜。


一位密切关注狗狗币的分析师在其历史价格图表中,识别出一个反复出现的圆底形态——该形态在过去多次成为价格大幅拉升的前奏。分析师认为,当前的技术结构与宏观市场环境的潜在转变,可能共同成为推动狗狗币再次“起飞”的催化剂。

宏观视角:狗狗币的滞后与追赶


加密货币分析师将狗狗币的价格走势与 iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) 及一篮子“其他山寨币”进行对比,描绘出宏观经济周期如何传导至加密风险资产。


图表分析显示,在山寨币和 IWM 率先进入“风险偏好”阶段后,狗狗币的价格反应往往滞后。通常,当 IWM 开始爆发、山寨币普涨时,狗狗币仍会维持一段时间的低迷。然而,真正的价格加速点出现在山寨币指数突破其历史高点之后。此时,狗狗币将受益于 IWM 和其他山寨币的溢出动能,进入爆发阶段。


历史周期:惊人的涨幅预期与价格发现


另一篇由分析师 Zero 发布的深度研究,进一步强化了这一看涨观点。他绘制了一张可追溯至2014年的狗狗币长期图表,清晰地勾勒出三个主要的积累和扩张周期

图表显示,每个周期都经历了不同级别的长期横盘整理,随后便是惊人的大幅上涨——过去的牛市曾带来218倍548倍的爆发式增长。根据这一模型,Zero 预测狗狗币可能再次迎来高达50倍的涨幅,并强调该资产目前正处于盘整阶段的尾声,即将进入新一轮的“价格发现”阶段。


图表中标记的绿色历史累积区表明,当前的市场结构与以往大涨前的平静期高度相似。


结论:万事俱备,只欠东风

综合来看,技术分析指向同一个结论:狗狗币的圆底形态、周期性的滞后效应以及宏观市场可能转向“风险开启”模式,共同为其下一轮抛物线式上涨铺平了道路。市场似乎已在为这个 meme 币的再次“飞翔”酝酿条件,只待宏观东风的到来。

Related Reads

Encryption Claims Dilemma: The Reality of Rights Protection Under the Conflict of Criminal and Civil Procedures

"Encrypted Claims Dilemma: The Reality of Rights Protection Amidst Criminal-Civil Procedure Conflicts" This article examines the challenges victims face in seeking legal recourse for cryptocurrency theft or fraud in China, highlighting the tension between criminal and civil procedures. Through two representative cases, it illustrates how cross-jurisdictional complexities and regulatory ambiguities often hinder effective relief. In Case 1, a South Korean company paid 800,000 USDT to a Chinese employee of an S-based exchange for listing services, only to have the employee disappear. Despite legal efforts citing属地管辖 (territorial jurisdiction) and the property-like status of virtual assets under China’s "9.24 Notice," local police initially refused to accept the case due to the foreign elements involved. After persistent advocacy, the case was accepted but not formally立案 (registered). Case 2 involved a woman scammed out of over 3 million RMB while attempting to purchase USDT through an OTC trader for investment. While the trader was arrested, the main fraudster remained abroad. Civil action against the trader for unjust enrichment failed, as courts cited the "criminal-first" principle (刑事优先), requiring criminal resolution before civil claims can proceed. The analysis reveals that civil remedies are often impractical when criminal elements are involved: courts may transfer such cases to police, and even successful criminal convictions may not guarantee restitution if perpetrators lack assets. The author concludes that, despite guides on civil litigation, pursuing criminal avenues remains the more viable—though still fraught—path for victims seeking recovery. The piece underscores systemic hurdles, including judicial reluctance to recognize crypto-related claims and procedural barriers, urging greater clarity in legal frameworks to protect victims.

比推9m ago

Encryption Claims Dilemma: The Reality of Rights Protection Under the Conflict of Criminal and Civil Procedures

比推9m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片