Financial Giant BlackRock Files for Staked Ethereum Exchange-Traded Fund

dailyhodlPublished on 2025-12-08Last updated on 2025-12-08

Abstract

Financial giant BlackRock has filed with the SEC to launch a staked Ethereum ETF called the "iShares Staked Ethereum Trust ETF," which would trade under the ticker "ETHB." The fund plans to stake 70-90% of its Ethereum holdings, while maintaining a liquidity reserve to manage redemption risks. Coinbase Custody Trust Company is named as the primary custodian, with Anchorage Digital Bank as an alternative, and BNY Mellon handling cash holdings. BlackRock already manages the largest spot Ethereum ETF (ETHA) with over $11 billion in assets.

The financial giant BlackRock wants to launch a new staked Ethereum (ETH) exchange-traded fund.

The world’s largest asset manager has filed an S-1 registration statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the new “iShares Staked Ethereum Trust ETF,” which, if approved, would trade under the ticker “ETHB.”

BlackRock says in the filing that it plans to stake 70-90% of the trust’s available Ethereum under normal market circumstances.

“The trust’s staking program seeks to maximize the portion of the Trust’s ether available for staking while controlling for liquidity and redemption risks. To manage the liquidity and redemption risks associated with staking, the sponsor intends to maintain a reserve of unstaked ether (the ‘Liquidity Sleeve’) designed to accommodate anticipated redemption activity.”

The filing indicates Coinbase Custody Trust Company would act as the ETF’s Ethereum custodian, with Anchorage Digital Bank tapped to serve as an “available alternative custodian.” The financial services giant BNY Mellon would custody the trust’s cash holdings.

BlackRock already offers a spot Bitcoin (BTC) ETF (IBIT) and a spot Ethereum ETF (ETHA). With $11.15 billion worth of assets under management (AUM), ETHA is currently the largest available spot ETH ETF by a wide margin, according to data from CoinMarketCap.

Follow us on X, Facebook and Telegram
Don't Miss a Beat – Subscribe to get email alerts delivered directly to your inbox
Check Price Action
Surf The Daily Hodl Mix

Featured Image: Shutterstock/Natalia Siiatovskaia/Roman3dArt

Related Reads

Encryption Claims Dilemma: The Reality of Rights Protection Under the Conflict of Criminal and Civil Procedures

"Encrypted Claims Dilemma: The Reality of Rights Protection Amidst Criminal-Civil Procedure Conflicts" This article examines the challenges victims face in seeking legal recourse for cryptocurrency theft or fraud in China, highlighting the tension between criminal and civil procedures. Through two representative cases, it illustrates how cross-jurisdictional complexities and regulatory ambiguities often hinder effective relief. In Case 1, a South Korean company paid 800,000 USDT to a Chinese employee of an S-based exchange for listing services, only to have the employee disappear. Despite legal efforts citing属地管辖 (territorial jurisdiction) and the property-like status of virtual assets under China’s "9.24 Notice," local police initially refused to accept the case due to the foreign elements involved. After persistent advocacy, the case was accepted but not formally立案 (registered). Case 2 involved a woman scammed out of over 3 million RMB while attempting to purchase USDT through an OTC trader for investment. While the trader was arrested, the main fraudster remained abroad. Civil action against the trader for unjust enrichment failed, as courts cited the "criminal-first" principle (刑事优先), requiring criminal resolution before civil claims can proceed. The analysis reveals that civil remedies are often impractical when criminal elements are involved: courts may transfer such cases to police, and even successful criminal convictions may not guarantee restitution if perpetrators lack assets. The author concludes that, despite guides on civil litigation, pursuing criminal avenues remains the more viable—though still fraught—path for victims seeking recovery. The piece underscores systemic hurdles, including judicial reluctance to recognize crypto-related claims and procedural barriers, urging greater clarity in legal frameworks to protect victims.

比推43m ago

Encryption Claims Dilemma: The Reality of Rights Protection Under the Conflict of Criminal and Civil Procedures

比推43m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片