The Long-Awaited Cryptocurrency Bill Known as the 'Clarity Act' Reaches a Critical Juncture: White House to Review It This Weekend

cryptonews.ruPublicado a 2026-08-01Actualizado a 2026-08-01

Resumen

The future of the U.S. cryptocurrency market regulation, the CLARITY Act, is at a critical stage, with its advancement potentially hinging on a White House decision this weekend. The Trump administration is reviewing a new bipartisan ethics proposal from Senators Tom Tillis (R) and Ruben Gallego (D). This counter-proposal aims to empower state attorneys general to prosecute federal officials if the Justice Department fails to enforce ethics and conflict-of-interest rules, addressing Democratic concerns about DOJ enforcement under the current administration. If an agreement on these ethics provisions is reached, a Senate vote on the CLARITY Act could proceed, though it still requires 60 votes for passage. The bill, which passed the Senate Banking Committee, seeks to clarify the regulatory roles of the SEC and CFTC over crypto assets and establish a comprehensive market structure. Key compromises include regulations for stablecoin yield programs, allowing rewards tied to transactions or platform use while limiting interest-like payments based solely on token holding. Failure to reach an ethics deal could stall the bill's progress, prolonging uncertainty for stablecoin rewards and related regulations.

The future of the CLARITY Act, aimed at regulating the cryptocurrency market in the U.S., may hinge on the Trump administration's response to a new bipartisan proposal concerning ethical issues.

According to cryptocurrency journalist Eleanor Terrett, the Trump administration is reviewing a counter-proposal developed by Republican Senator Thom Tillis and Democratic Senator Ruben Gallego. This proposal would empower state attorneys general to prosecute federal officials if the Department of Justice fails to enforce ethics rules and conflict-of-interest prevention regulations.

The new proposal aims to address concerns raised by Democrats, who fear that relying on the Department of Justice, which is under the Trump administration's purview, to directly enforce ethics rules does not provide sufficient safeguards. A previous draft, backed by the White House, was criticized for leaving enforcement authority with the Department of Justice and for having restrictions that expire in January 2029.

According to Terrett, the White House is expected to review this proposal over the weekend. If the parties reach an agreement on the ethics provisions, a Senate vote on the CLARITY Act could proceed. However, to pass a procedural vote, the bill needs the support of 60 senators, and the necessary backing is not yet secured.

The bill, passed by the Senate Banking Committee with a 15-9 vote, aims to define the jurisdictional boundaries of the SEC and CFTC regarding crypto assets and to establish a comprehensive market structure for the sector. The bill also includes provisions for addressing matters related to stablecoin yields and some legal protections for software developers who do not provide custodial services.

A compromise reached on stablecoin regulation limits interest-like payments based solely on holding tokens, while allowing rewards tied to transactions, payments, loyalty programs, or platform usage. This is an attempt to balance banks' concerns about deposit outflows with crypto companies' demands to preserve their reward programs.

If an agreement on the ethics provisions cannot be reached, progress on the CLARITY Act in the Senate could once again stall, and uncertainty regarding stablecoin reward regulations and the implementation of provisions in the GENIUS Act may persist.

*This is not investment advice.

Criptos en tendencia

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

PancakeSwapCAKE

JUSTJST

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main subject of the article and what is its current legislative status?

AThe main subject is the CLARITY Act, a U.S. cryptocurrency regulation bill known as the 'Clarity Act.' It is at a critical stage, as its future may depend on the White House's consideration of a new bipartisan ethics proposal this weekend, which could unblock a Senate vote.

QWhat specific issue in the CLARITY Act is causing a political hurdle, and what is the new proposal to address it?

AThe hurdle is the enforcement of ethics and conflict-of-interest rules. The original White House-backed bill was criticized for leaving enforcement power with the Department of Justice (under Trump's administration) with an expiry in 2029. The new bipartisan proposal by Senators Tillis (R) and Gallego (D) would empower state attorneys general to prosecute federal officials if the DOJ fails to enforce these ethics standards.

QWhat are the key objectives of the CLARITY Act regarding U.S. crypto market regulation?

AThe key objectives of the CLARITY Act are to define the regulatory boundaries between the SEC and CFTC for crypto assets and to establish a comprehensive market structure for the sector. It also includes provisions for regulating stablecoin yields and some legal protections for software developers who do not provide custody services.

QWhat compromise was reached regarding stablecoin rewards in the bill?

AThe compromise restricts interest-like payments based solely on holding tokens but allows rewards tied to transactions, payments, loyalty programs, or platform usage. This aims to balance banking sector concerns about deposit flight with crypto companies' desire to maintain their reward programs.

QWhat are the potential consequences if an agreement on the ethics provisions is not reached?

AIf an agreement is not reached, the advancement of the CLARITY Act in the Senate could be stalled again. Furthermore, regulatory uncertainty would persist concerning stablecoin rewards and the implementation of provisions from the related GENIUS Act.

Lecturas Relacionadas

【U.S. Stock Index Futures】Understanding the Three Major U.S. Stock Indices and Their Futures

[U.S. Stock Index Futures] Understanding the Three Major U.S. Stock Indices and Futures

Hace 1 hora(s)

【U.S. Stock Index Futures】Understanding the Three Major U.S. Stock Indices and Their Futures

Hace 1 hora(s)

Goldman Sachs Comments on SanDisk and Western Digital Earnings: Strong Performance, But Market Expectations Too High

Highsmith commented on Sandisk and Western Digital's earnings reports, noting that while both companies delivered strong quarterly results, excessively high market expectations are likely to prevent their stock prices from benefiting. The firm anticipates downward pressure on both stocks following the earnings releases. The core issue, according to Highsmith, is not a deterioration in fundamentals but rather market expectations that have overshot reality. Despite impressive beats on revenue, gross margin, and EPS for the quarter, guidance that simply meets or falls slightly below lofty expectations is being interpreted negatively. For Western Digital, Q2 revenue was largely in line with forecasts, while gross margin and EPS beat estimates. However, its Q3 revenue guidance midpoint matched consensus, and gross margin/EPS guidance was only slightly above. Highsmith views this as "not surprising enough" given pre-earnings optimism, maintaining a Neutral rating and a $650 price target. Sandisk's Q2 results significantly exceeded consensus for revenue and EPS. However, its Q3 guidance disappointed, with revenue and gross margin midpoints below Highsmith's forecasts and consensus. Although the stock has declined ~40% from its June peak, Highsmith believes the below-consensus guidance will lead to further pressure, while maintaining a Buy rating and a $2,200 target due to longer-term potential. Highsmith also warns of a negative spillover effect on Micron Technology's stock due to its similar end-market exposure to Sandisk.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Goldman Sachs Comments on SanDisk and Western Digital Earnings: Strong Performance, But Market Expectations Too High

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

After the Lending Markets Disappear, What's Left for These Public Chains?

"The Lending Market Vanishes: What Remains for These Blockchains?" Last week, Aave announced the closure of its lending markets on six blockchains where each generated less than $5,000 in quarterly revenue. This move highlights a critical trend: while the DeFi lending sector is growing overall, it is becoming highly concentrated on a few leading chains like Ethereum, Base, and Arbitrum. The article analyzes the cascading effects when a major lending protocol like Aave exits a chain. Past examples, such as Harmony Protocol and Fantom (later rebranded as Sonic), demonstrate that losing core lending infrastructure leads to a complete collapse of the credit ecosystem. This is because a functional lending market relies on a costly, interconnected stack of services—including reliable price oracles (often maintained by the largest protocol), deep DEX liquidity for liquidations, and stablecoin issuers willing to support native minting and redemption. Once the primary lending demand disappears, maintaining this infrastructure becomes commercially unviable, triggering an exodus of other service providers. The six chains Aave is leaving (including Soneium, Aptos, zkSync, and Scroll) are in an even weaker position than Harmony or Fantom were. They never developed substantial native lending demand despite significant initial funding. Aave's departure will likely accelerate the withdrawal of oracle providers, market makers, and stablecoin issuers, as their business cases depend on a functioning credit market. This creates a self-reinforcing cycle of centralization, where resources and activity consolidate on the most viable chains. The dilemma mirrors challenges in traditional finance, such as global banks withdrawing correspondent banking services from small countries due to high fixed compliance costs. However, unlike the traditional system where institutions like the World Bank can provide subsidies, there is no such safety net in the decentralized crypto space. The key takeaway is that while launching a new blockchain is cheap, operating a full-featured, sustainable credit infrastructure on it is extremely expensive. Aave has now set a minimum annual revenue threshold of $2 million for new chain deployments, roughly covering these fixed costs. The future for many smaller chains may be a fragmented ecosystem with flawed, unofficial forks of major protocols, or they may be left with nothing at all as DeFi lending continues its aggressive consolidation.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

After the Lending Markets Disappear, What's Left for These Public Chains?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

SanDisk Sells $3 Billion More in Three Months, Price Speaks Louder Than Volume

SanDisk's latest quarterly report (FY2026 Q4 ending July 3) shows revenue surged to $8.965 billion, a 51% increase quarter-over-quarter and a dramatic jump from $1.901 billion in the year-ago period. The sequential revenue gain of $3.015 billion alone exceeded the total revenue of FY2025 Q4. A key driver was profitability: the cost of sales increased by only about $95 million against the $3.015 billion revenue increase, leading to significantly expanded gross margins. While GAAP net profit was influenced by a $804 million gain on equity securities, the core business showed strong operational performance. Revenue growth was split, with approximately two-thirds attributed to higher selling prices and one-third to increased sales volume. Market segment analysis reveals that Data Center revenue doubled, becoming the growth narrative highlight. However, the Edge market segment contributed a slightly larger absolute dollar increase and remains the largest revenue base. Consumer segment revenue declined, indicating uneven demand across end markets. The report illustrates a multi-faceted story: Data Center provides high-growth visibility, Edge delivers the largest incremental sales, and favorable pricing dynamics convert new revenue into substantial profit expansion, moving beyond a simple AI-driven demand narrative.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

SanDisk Sells $3 Billion More in Three Months, Price Speaks Louder Than Volume

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Western Digital Quarterly Profit Hits $3.195 Billion, But How Much Did the Hard Drive Business Actually Make?

Western Digital reported FY2026 Q4 revenue of $3.747 billion, with GAAP earnings per share of $8.21. A key distinction in the results is the separation of its core HDD business from gains related to its retained stake in SanDisk. Following the flash memory business spin-off in February 2025, the company's revenue growth over the last five quarters represents a pure expansion of its HDD operations, primarily driven by demand from cloud and data-intensive workloads, which constituted 89% of Q4 revenue. The business showed significant margin improvement, with GAAP gross margin reaching 54.1% in Q4, meaning over half of every revenue dollar remained after direct manufacturing costs. This expansion in both revenue and profitability is reflected in free cash flow of $1.281 billion for the quarter. GAAP net income was $3.195 billion, heavily influenced by a $2.05 billion non-cash gain from the revaluation of the SanDisk stake. On a non-GAAP basis, which excludes this and other items, net income was $1.382 billion. This adjustment highlights the underlying strength of the HDD business itself, which has seen a sustained period of growth and improved profitability independent of its financial investments.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Western Digital Quarterly Profit Hits $3.195 Billion, But How Much Did the Hard Drive Business Actually Make?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar HOUSE

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Housecoin (HOUSE) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Housecoin (HOUSE) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Housecoin (HOUSE)Después de comprar tu Housecoin (HOUSE), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Housecoin (HOUSE)Tradear fácilmente con Housecoin (HOUSE) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

340 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2025.04.27Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de HOUSE (HOUSE).