The Heart of the 'Artificial Sun': China Builds Largest Magnet for Fusion Reactor

cryptonews.ruPublicado em 2026-07-28Última atualização em 2026-07-28

Resumo

On June 27, 2026, China's Institute of Plasma Physics announced the successful development and comprehensive testing of two key superconducting magnets for its "artificial sun" fusion reactor project. These magnets are crucial for containing plasma exceeding 100 million degrees Celsius within a vacuum chamber using powerful magnetic fields. The first is a D-shaped toroidal field magnet, claimed to be the world's largest for a fusion reactor. Measuring 21m long and weighing 582 tons, it has 1.3 times the volume and triple the stored energy of its counterpart in the international ITER project. Key parameters include a 98 kA operating current and 120 GJ of stored energy. Sixteen such magnets will eventually form a ring generating a central field of 6.5 Tesla to confine the plasma. Concurrently tested was a high-temperature superconducting central solenoid. It stably carries 60 kA of current and plays a critical role in inducing and sustaining the plasma current, essentially "igniting" the fusion reaction. All key technologies and materials are domestically developed, with 47 patents filed. The magnets are destined for the BEST (Burning Plasma Experimental Superconducting Tokamak) device, with assembly planned by 2027 and a demonstration of power generation targeted for around 2030. Fusion is pursued as a potential source of vast, clean energy without long-lived radioactive waste. While this marks a significant technical achievement, the article's concluding AI perspective not...

On June 27, 2026, the Institute of Plasma Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (ASIPP) in Hefei, Anhui province, completed the development and full parametric testing of two key superconducting magnets for a fusion reactor as part of the 'Artificial Sun' project. The institute itself announced this news.

Put simply: for nuclear fusion to work, you need to confine plasma at temperatures exceeding 100 million degrees Celsius so that it doesn't touch the walls of the chamber. No material can withstand such heat, so the plasma is 'levitated' in a vacuum using a powerful magnetic field. Superconducting magnets are precisely what's needed to create this field – the more powerful they are, the more stably and for longer the reaction can be sustained.

Toroidal Magnet: A Record-Holder in Volume and Energy

The first of the tested components is a Toroidal Field (TF) superconducting magnet. It has a D-shape, measures 21 meters in length, 12 meters in width, and 3.3 meters in height, and weighs 582 tons. The developers call it the world's largest superconducting magnet for a fusion reactor: its volume is 1.3 times larger and its stored energy is 3 times higher than that of a similar magnet for the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) in France – the world's most famous and expensive fusion project.

The parameters of a single such magnet are impressive:

  • Operating current – 98 kiloamperes;
  • Stored energy – 120 gigajoules;
  • Maximum field on the magnet itself – 14.5 tesla;
  • Design lifespan for stable operation – 60 years under conditions of ultra-low temperatures, high currents, strong radiation, and mechanical loads.

In the future, 16 such magnets will be assembled into a ring – it will create a magnetic field with a strength of 6.5 tesla at the center of the plasma. It is this field that is meant to hold the superheated matter inside the vacuum chamber, preventing it from destroying the reactor walls.

The Solenoid That Ignites and Sustains the Plasma

In parallel with the toroidal magnet, full testing was completed on a high-temperature superconducting central solenoid. This component stably conducts a current of 60 kiloamperes, its stored energy is 6.03 megajoules, its maximum field ramp rate reaches 5.1 tesla per second, and the resistance of its joints is only 0.87 nano-ohms.

If the toroidal magnet confines the plasma in the shape of a ring, the central solenoid is responsible for another task: it induces and sustains the plasma current itself, and also regulates its shape. Without this element, there would simply be nothing to 'ignite' the reaction with.

Fully Chinese Technologies and Patents

The developers emphasize that all key technologies, materials – including superconducting tapes, special steel, and insulation – and production processes are entirely domestic. The development took six years, during which 47 patents were obtained and 14 standards were developed.

Both magnets will become part of the Comprehensive Research Facility for Fusion Technology (CRAFT) and are intended for the Burning Plasma Experimental Superconducting Tokamak (BEST). The assembly of BEST is planned to be completed by the end of 2027, with a demonstration of electricity generation from nuclear fusion expected around 2030.

Why All This Is Needed

Nuclear fusion is the same reaction that powers the Sun and stars: light atomic nuclei fuse into heavier ones, releasing enormous energy. Unlike nuclear fission power plants, which use the decay of heavy nuclei, a fusion reaction does not produce long-lived radioactive waste and is considered a source of practically inexhaustible clean energy.

The magnets tested in Hefei are not a ready-made power plant, but a key technical element on the path to one. The Institute of Plasma Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences has demonstrated its ability to build superconducting components that surpass even the international ITER project in scale, entirely on its own technological base.

AI Opinion

From the perspective of macroeconomic comparisons, the fusion race appears not only as a 'race of magnets' but also a race of financing models. While the Chinese project is scaling up with state funding, the American company Commonwealth Fusion Systems already tested a compact high-temperature superconducting magnet reaching 20 tesla in 2021 and later raised $1.8 billion in private investment based on this result. The difference in approaches is fundamental: betting on scale and low-temperature superconductivity versus betting on compactness and ReBCO materials that reduce cooling costs. The historical experience of fusion programs, from the first tokamaks in the 1960s to budget freezes in the 1980s, suggests that the decisive factor has more often been not the power of the magnet, but the sustainability of funding over a timescale of decades. Which model – state-led or venture-backed – will bring fusion power to the electrical grid faster?

end-content

Criptomoedas em alta

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main purpose of the toroidal magnetic field (TF) magnet developed by the Chinese Academy of Sciences?

AIts main purpose is to create a powerful magnetic field to confine super-hot plasma, preventing it from contacting and damaging the walls of the reactor's vacuum chamber during fusion.

QHow do the key parameters of China's new toroidal field (TF) magnet compare to those of the ITER project's similar magnet?

AChina's TF magnet has a volume 1.3 times larger and stores three times more energy than the comparable magnet used in the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) project in France.

QWhat specific roles do the toroidal field (TF) magnet and the central solenoid play in a fusion reactor like the planned BEST?

AThe toroidal field magnet is responsible for shaping and confining the plasma ring. The central solenoid induces and maintains the plasma current, essentially 'igniting' and stabilizing the fusion reaction.

QWhat key technological achievement does the article highlight about the development of these magnets?

AThe article highlights that all key technologies, materials (including superconducting tapes, special steel, and insulation), and manufacturing processes are fully domestic Chinese developments, supported by 47 patents and 14 standards.

QAccording to the AI opinion section, what are the two contrasting approaches in the 'fusion race' mentioned, and what is the critical factor for success according to historical experience?

AThe two approaches are China's state-funded model focusing on scale and low-temperature superconductivity versus the US venture-backed model (like Commonwealth Fusion Systems) focusing on compactness and high-temperature superconducting materials (ReBCO). The historical experience suggests that sustained, long-term funding over decades is more critical than just magnet power for ultimate success.

Leituras Relacionadas

Investors Begin 'Switching Tables'

Investors Begin to “Change Tables” A notable shift is occurring in China's venture capital landscape. While the hard tech sector, especially AI, experiences a funding frenzy with record-breaking investment rounds, many investors are opting to leave traditional investment firms to join portfolio companies. This movement, termed "changing tables," marks a departure from past downturns where such moves were often a last resort. Currently, the trend is driven by proactive choice. Seasoned investors, including partners and managing directors, are being lured by attractive salaries, equity incentives, and core roles like VP, General Manager, or even co-founder at fast-growing startups in hot sectors like AI, embodied intelligence, and aerospace. This "going ashore" to companies is seen as a strategic career move. The shift is a two-way street. Booming fundraising and feverish investment activity have created intense competition among VCs for a narrow set of "star projects." Simultaneously, these high-flying tech companies, engaged in rapid, multi-round financing, urgently need talent with deep capital market expertise and institutional connections to manage their complex funding needs. Companies like Zhiyuan Robot, MoonDark AI, and MiniMax are actively recruiting from investment firms. For investors, the move also reflects concerns about the sustainability of the current market. Risks like valuation inversion between primary and secondary markets, high IPO破发 rates, increased regulatory scrutiny, and the uncertainty of eventual exits are prompting a reevaluation of the traditional VC path. While this transition offers new opportunities, it is not without challenges. Success requires adapting from evaluating companies to operating within one, focusing on execution over analysis. Nevertheless, this trend underscores the expanding career boundaries and fluidity within China's innovation ecosystem.

marsbitHá 15m

Investors Begin 'Switching Tables'

marsbitHá 15m

Ethereum Community in Uproar! Whose Cake is EIP-8363 Cutting Into?

**Ethereum Community Debates Controversial Staking Proposal EIP-8363** A new Ethereum proposal, EIP-8363, dubbed "Tapered Issuance Burn," has ignited heated debate within the community. The core idea is to reduce and eventually eliminate new issuance rewards for validators as the total amount of staked ETH approaches 50% of the total supply (around 60.25 million ETH). The authors, including EthCC founder Jérôme de Tychey and Ethereum Foundation researcher Justin Drake, argue the current system perpetually incentivizes more staking, potentially leading to centralization as stake flows to large custodians and liquid staking tokens (LSTs). They also aim to reduce dilution pressure on non-staking ETH holders. Under the proposal, validator rewards from consensus-layer issuance would be partially burned based on a formula tied to the total staked amount. Net rewards would gradually approach zero as staking nears the 50% threshold. Notably, execution-layer rewards (tips, MEV) are unaffected. A proposed 18-month transition period would soften the initial impact. The community reaction has been predominantly critical. Key concerns include: * **Centralization Risk:** Critics like Obol's Oisín Kyne argue very low rewards could drive out solo stakers and smaller operators, leaving only large, cost-insensitive institutions, thus increasing validator centralization. * **Ecosystem Impact:** Aave's Stani Kulechov warns it could hurt ETH's predictable yield appeal for institutions and compress yields for LST-based DeFi strategies (e.g., recursive lending). * **Process & Timing:** Some, like ether.fi's Mike Silagadze, criticize the proposal's late submission ahead of a key upgrade deadline, limiting discussion time. Supporters believe the change is necessary to maintain ETH as a neutral reserve asset and avoid excessive security costs and holder dilution. If implemented, solo stakers would face higher relative operational costs and longer recovery times from penalties. LST yields would converge with native ETH, challenging their value proposition. The entire DeFi interest rate ecosystem, built around staking yield, could be pressured. While all ETH holders would benefit from reduced dilution, the net effect on ETH's price and adoption remains uncertain due to potential demand-side impacts from lower yields. The proposal is currently an early-stage draft and has not been officially slated for inclusion in any upcoming network upgrade.

marsbitHá 44m

Ethereum Community in Uproar! Whose Cake is EIP-8363 Cutting Into?

marsbitHá 44m

Trading

Spot

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar SUN

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de SUN (SUN) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar SUN (SUN) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu SUN (SUN)Depois de comprar o teu SUN (SUN), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona SUN (SUN)Transaciona facilmente SUN (SUN) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

634 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2025.03.21

Como comprar SUN

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de SUN (SUN) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片