$100,000 a Month, Trump Starts Selling 'Alpha'

Odaily星球日报Publicado em 2026-07-18Última atualização em 2026-07-18

Resumo

Donald Trump's media company is reportedly planning to sell low-latency access to his Truth Social posts to institutional clients for up to $100,000 per month. This service would allow traders and investment firms to see his posts—often containing major policy announcements—a few seconds before the general public. In fast-moving financial markets, this brief time advantage is considered highly valuable, enabling subscribers to potentially profit from early reactions to market-moving statements. The report compares this "Trump Terminal" to traditional financial data services like Bloomberg Terminal, noting a key difference: while others aggregate and distribute information, Trump's service offers direct, privileged access to the source himself. This move is seen as the latest example of Trump commercializing his political influence and personal brand, following ventures into NFTs, meme coins, and other media products. The underlying premise is that his statements have repeatedly moved markets, making early access to them a tradable asset.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily(@OdailyChina)

Author | Azuma(@azuma_eth)

Trump has once again pulled off a "stunt" that defies public perception.

The Financial Times reports that Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG) is exploring ways to commercialize the real-time news feed on its Truth Social platform, planning to offer low-latency data services to institutional clients for as much as $100,000 per month. Institutions purchasing this service will be able to access Trump's latest posts faster than regular users, to track policy signals, market sentiment, and the potential impact of political events.

The Time Advantage is the Most Valuable Thing in the Market

For investors focused on the U.S. market, Truth Social is not an ordinary social media platform. After the January 6th Capitol riot in 2021, Trump was banned from mainstream platforms like Twitter (now X) and Facebook. Subsequently, TMTG launched Truth Social, and Trump began using it as his primary channel for communication. Although Trump later regained his X account, his major policy statements on tariffs, trade, foreign affairs, regulation, and more are still often published first on Truth Social, gradually making it the primary source for global investors tracking Trump's movements.

Even so, this seems like an almost unbelievable business. After all, Truth Social is itself a public platform, and every post Trump makes becomes visible to everyone within seconds. Since the information is public, why would institutions be willing to pay such a high price for it?

The answer is actually quite simple. In financial markets, the most expensive thing has never been the information itself, but the time advantage of obtaining it earlier than others.

For the average user, seeing a post a few seconds earlier is almost meaningless. But for quantitative funds, high-frequency trading firms, and even some crypto trading teams, those few seconds can determine whether a trade results in profit or loss. When the market has become accustomed to repricing assets based on Trump's every move, whoever gets the information first has the chance to act first.

In other words, what TMTG is really selling is not a post, but a form of "Presidential Alpha."

The 'Trump Terminal' That Surpasses Bloomberg Terminal

In fact, TMTG is not the first to think of this business.

On Wall Street, selling real-time data is an extremely mature business model. Whether it's Bloomberg, Reuters, the New York Stock Exchange, or Nasdaq, they all have long provided paid data services to institutions. From corporate earnings reports and macroeconomic data to stock tick-by-tick trades and order book changes, these institutions can often access information earlier via dedicated lines or data interfaces with lower latency and higher stability.

Notably, what they sell is mostly not "exclusive news" — the vast majority of information is eventually made public to the entire market. What's truly valuable is that institutions can receive this information milliseconds, hundreds of milliseconds, or even seconds faster than others. This time advantage often translates to trading opportunities and can directly determine a strategy's profitability.

TMTG is doing the same thing, even taking it a step further — unlike traditional financial terminals like Bloomberg Terminal, which are merely collectors and distributors of information, Trump himself is the source. No matter how fast a Bloomberg Terminal is, it is essentially aggregating and transmitting market information; what TMTG is selling is exclusive priority access to every update Trump posts on Truth Social.

In other words, no matter how powerful the Bloomberg Terminal is, it's just a second-hand information broker, while the leader's "Trump Terminal" is absolute firsthand intelligence.

This Money, Only Trump Can Make

Theoretically, every U.S. president, as well as leaders of other major nations, possess a similar ability to influence markets.

From key official appointments to fiscal policies, from diplomatic maneuvers to war conflicts, a leader's words and actions can sway the pricing of global capital markets. But Trump is probably the only one to actually package this influence into a business and unabashedly sell it to Wall Street.

The crucial premise here is that Trump's firsthand information is truly valuable enough.

Over the past few years, Trump's Truth Social has become a critical information source for global investors. From tariff policies and trade negotiations to cryptocurrency regulation and Federal Reserve Chair selections, Trump's posts have repeatedly triggered sharp fluctuations in the stock market, the U.S. dollar, gold, and crypto markets. A series of trading strategies formed around expectations of Trump's policies, such as "Trump Trades" and "TACO Trades," further demonstrate that the market has long viewed his pronouncements as a tradable "market factor."

But the more important reason might be Trump himself. If past U.S. presidents largely viewed their political influence as a public resource, Trump is more accustomed to seeing influence as an asset that can be operated, amplified, and commercialized.

Looking back over recent years, from NFTs and meme coins to Truth Social, Truth.Fi, Trump Mobile, and now selling real-time Truth Social data services to institutions, the product forms have constantly changed, but the underlying logic has remained unchanged — continuously transforming the "Trump" IP into a commercial product that can be sold, subscribed to, and invested in.

For many traditional politicians, the presidency signifies power and necessitates maintaining a distance from commercial interests. In Trump's eyes, the two do not seem to have a natural boundary. As long as the market is willing to pay for influence, then influence itself can become a commodity.

In other words, Trump did not create the demand; rather, he realized earlier than anyone else that "presidential influence" itself is an asset that can be priced and sold.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat service is Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG) reportedly exploring, and how much does it cost?

ATMTG is exploring the commercialization of Truth Social's real-time feed by offering low-latency data services to institutional clients, with a reported price of up to $100,000 per month.

QWhy would institutional clients be willing to pay a high fee for access to Trump's posts on Truth Social a few seconds earlier than the public?

ABecause in financial markets, the time advantage of receiving information even a few seconds earlier can be critical for trading decisions. For quant funds, high-frequency trading firms, and crypto trading teams, this head start can determine the profit or loss of a trade, as markets often react to Trump's policy signals.

QHow does the proposed 'Trump Terminal' service differ from traditional financial data terminals like Bloomberg Terminal?

ATraditional terminals like Bloomberg Terminal aggregate and distribute market information from various sources, acting as secondary information distributors. In contrast, the 'Trump Terminal' offers exclusive priority access to Trump's posts directly from the source (Truth Social), making it a primary information channel.

QAccording to the article, what is the underlying logic behind Trump's various business ventures like NFTs, meme coins, and now the data service?

AThe underlying logic is the continuous commercialization of the 'Trump' IP. The article states that Trump consistently transforms his influence and personal brand into sellable, subscribable, and investable commercial products.

QWhat does the article suggest is unique about Trump's approach to presidential influence compared to other politicians?

AThe article suggests that while traditional politicians often view presidential influence as a public resource to be kept separate from business, Trump sees it as a commercially viable asset. He recognizes that 'presidential influence' itself can be priced and sold as a commodity if the market is willing to pay for it.

Leituras Relacionadas

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

The cryptocurrency market has just concluded its worst-performing quarter since 2022, with total capitalization dropping 12.6% to $2.1 trillion. All core metrics indicate capital is leaving the sector, not just rotating within it. Bitcoin fell 14.2% and Ethereum dropped 25.4% in Q2, breaking their previous correlation with US tech stocks. A key driver is the reversal in US spot Bitcoin ETF flows, which saw a net outflow of approximately $4.67 billion in Q2, including a record monthly outflow near $4.5 billion in June. While recent data suggests long-term holders are accumulating again, sustained ETF outflows mean continued selling pressure. Market focus is now singularly on the Federal Reserve. The upcoming July FOMC meeting is seen as the most critical event for Q3. A dovish signal could support Bitcoin reclaiming a $68,000-$84,000 range, while a hawkish stance might establish a new trading band around $50,000-$56,000. Additionally, regulatory uncertainty persists, with the progress of the crucial *CLARITY Act* stalling in the Senate, reducing its perceived 2026 passage probability to 40-45%. Despite the broad downturn, a few sectors showed growth. Prediction markets saw nominal volume surge 48.7% year-over-year to $113.8 billion, and tokenized collectibles transaction volume rose 143% quarterly to $1.4 billion. The Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization sector also continued steady growth, now representing ~$28.1 billion in on-chain value. The market's foundation for an extreme crash appears limited, with Bitcoin price hovering near its 200-week moving average. However, the trading paradigm has shifted from narrative-driven speculation to decisions based on price action, policy developments, and interest rate expectations, making a broad sentiment-driven rally unlikely in the near term.

marsbitOntem 08:36

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

marsbitOntem 08:36

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

**Crypto & Stock Market Wrap: Bitcoin Tests Resistance, Stocks Retreat After AI Surge** Bitcoin consolidates around $66,000, facing key resistance near $68,000—an area seen as a major psychological and technical hurdle where previous rallies have failed. Analysts note the cryptocurrency is caught between its 200-week moving average (~$63,333) and 200-week EMA (~$68,328). A clear break above $68k is needed to signal a stronger bullish trend, while a rejection could lead to a retest of $63k support. Market sentiment remains cautious, with low futures open interest pointing to a low-liquidity rebound rather than a full bull market. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw another $203 million inflow. US stock futures pointed lower after a strong Tuesday session led by a massive rebound in semiconductors and memory stocks. The rally was fueled by renewed optimism about AI-driven hardware demand, with Micron, SanDisk, and SK Hynix surging. However, those gains reversed in pre-market trading. Super Micro Computer (SMCI) soared over 20% after hours on strong guidance and a record backlog. Other standouts included Rocket Lab and nuclear energy plays Oklo and X-Energy. Rising oil prices (Brent above $91) and climbing Treasury yields (10-year near 4.64%), however, are reigniting inflation concerns and acting as a headwind for equities. In Asia, markets were mixed. South Korea's KOSPI pared early gains to close slightly higher as semiconductor stocks like SK Hynix gave back initial surges. Japan's Nikkei edged lower as the yen hit a fresh 38-year low against the dollar, raising fears of potential market intervention. Key events to watch include the Samsung Galaxy launch, AMD's AI event, and a slew of major tech earnings from Alphabet, Tesla, and IBM after the close on Wednesday, followed by the ECB meeting and Intel's earnings on Thursday.

marsbitOntem 08:28

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

marsbitOntem 08:28

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

Former CFTC Chairman and Circle President Heath Tarbert has consistently advocated for a long-term vision in public, urging patience from investors as Circle’s stock price has fallen significantly from its peak. However, it has been revealed that since Circle’s IPO, Tarbert has continuously sold his CRCL shares through pre-arranged trading plans, cashing out approximately $30 million, without making any public market purchases. This contrast between his public messaging and personal actions has drawn criticism. Tarbert joined Circle in July 2023 as Chief Legal Officer, leveraging his regulatory experience to help guide the company through its IPO and expansion. Despite promoting stablecoins as long-term infrastructure, he established a 10b5-1 trading plan just before Circle went public, leading to substantial stock sales over the following year. In March 2026, he initiated another plan to sell more shares. His career trajectory highlights a pattern of moving between high-level regulatory roles and influential positions in the financial sector. After resigning as CFTC Chairman in early 2021, he joined Citadel Securities as Chief Legal Officer just 27 days later, during a period of intense regulatory scrutiny for the firm. He later joined Circle, aiding its efforts to navigate regulatory challenges for its public listing. While Tarbert's expertise in policy and compliance is valuable to companies like Circle, his actions—advocating long-term confidence while personally divesting—raise questions about the alignment between his public statements and his private financial decisions, leaving investors who followed his advice to bear the market risks.

marsbitOntem 08:06

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

marsbitOntem 08:06

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

The article titled "Gate Research Institute: Are Crypto Financial Products Sparking a 'Wall Street' Wave—Competition or Convergence?" explores the evolving relationship between the crypto ecosystem and traditional finance (TradFi). The piece begins by reflecting on Bitcoin's original 2009 vision of decentralization, disintermediation, and moving away from banks. It then contrasts this with the 2024 landscape, where key crypto assets like Bitcoin are increasingly held through Wall Street products like ETFs issued by giants like BlackRock. The article questions whether this signifies that TradFi is systematically taking over the rights to issue, price, custody, and distribute crypto financial assets. The core argument is that this is not a zero-sum takeover but rather a bidirectional convergence where each side addresses the other's weaknesses. Crypto offers 24/7 global markets, programmable settlement, and open access but lacks compliant channels, institutional-grade custody, deep fiat liquidity, and mainstream distribution. TradFi possesses these but is constrained by legacy systems, limited operating hours, and slow settlement. Two primary convergence paths are highlighted: * **Path A (CEX to TradFi):** Exemplified by Gate, which has progressed from offering tokenized stocks and CFDs to providing direct, real stock trading (US, Hong Kong, South Korea) within its platform, using USDT. * **Path B (TradFi to Crypto):** Exemplified by Robinhood, which has integrated crypto trading, acquired exchanges like Bitstamp, and is moving traditional assets like stocks onto the blockchain via tokenization and its own Layer 2. Both paths are ultimately competing to become the next-generation, unified financial account—a "super account" where users can seamlessly trade cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETFs, RWA (Real World Assets), and tokenized treasury products in one interface. The growth of RWA and tokenized treasuries (e.g., BlackRock's BUIDL) is presented as the asset-layer fusion, providing stable, yield-bearing assets on-chain and acting as a bridge between the two worlds. In conclusion, the "Wall Street-ization" of crypto is framed as a mutual transformation. Decentralized ideals persist in the protocol layer, while at the application layer, a more efficient, global, and accessible unified capital market is emerging from this convergence. The future competition lies not between crypto exchanges and stockbrokers, but between platforms vying to offer the most comprehensive asset coverage, liquidity, and user experience within a single account.

marsbitOntem 08:01

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

marsbitOntem 08:01

Trading

Spot
活动图片